公司職工董事職能實現(xiàn)法律問題研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-12 13:15
【摘要】：職工董事是董事的一種特殊類型,其具有一般董事所不具備的品性、特質(zhì)和角色,即職工董事具有一般董事所沒有的“職工性”。具體而言,職工董事是指公司職工以勞動者(而非管理者)的身份,通過一定的方式參與公司董事會運作的非管理崗職工,目的在于通過職工參與董事會實現(xiàn)決策主體的多元化、科學(xué)化和基層化,使職工利益與股東利益盡可能的達到聯(lián)合與統(tǒng)一,并在此過程中形成一種相互制衡、相互協(xié)調(diào)與促進的效率機制。我國職工董事制度來源于德國公司的職工共同決策制度,但在制度功能能上存在差異,特別是在職能的發(fā)揮方面。從這個意義上說,我國的職工董事制度是我國社會主義國家所特有的一種新的真正體現(xiàn)職工權(quán)益的公司治理方式。2005年新修訂的《公司法》對職工參與董事會作了較為明確的規(guī)定,為推進職工民主管理更加科學(xué)化、規(guī)范化,更加完善和落實職工董事制度提供了一個良好的契機。然而,現(xiàn)實中職工董事制度的運行十分艱難,究其根源還是職工董事的職能機制尚未厘清,相關(guān)法律問題尚未明確。因此,中國引進和革新職工董事制度必須結(jié)合中國自身的實際情況,其要求契合中國現(xiàn)有的公司治理結(jié)構(gòu)現(xiàn)實和法律文化傳統(tǒng),進行科學(xué)的制度設(shè)計和創(chuàng)新。完善公司立法,應(yīng)當(dāng)建立“三三制”的董事會治理結(jié)構(gòu),增加職工董事的比例,實現(xiàn)董事會內(nèi)部權(quán)力的制衡；處理好職工董事與其他董事、監(jiān)事會的關(guān)系與協(xié)調(diào),實現(xiàn)資源與優(yōu)勢的互補；從權(quán)利和責(zé)任的角度出發(fā),明確職工董事的具體職權(quán)和責(zé)任,如表決權(quán)、法律責(zé)任、報酬機制等；在程序方面,完善職工董事參與董事會會議具體的議事規(guī)則,實現(xiàn)職工董事真正享有公司管理中的民主參與權(quán)；從法律價值出發(fā),完善對職工董事專門的培養(yǎng)體系,通過法律法規(guī)或公司章程的規(guī)定對職工董事進行專門的培訓(xùn)以提高其綜合素質(zhì)。
[Abstract]:Employee director is a kind of special type of director, which has the character, characteristic and role that the general director does not have, that is, the employee director has the "worker nature" which the general director does not have. In particular, the employee director refers to the non-managerial staff and workers who participate in the operation of the company's board of directors in a certain way as workers (not as managers). The purpose of this paper is to realize the diversification, scientization and basicalization of decision-making subjects through the participation of staff and workers in the board of directors, so that the interests of workers and shareholders can be United and unified as far as possible, and a kind of checks and balances will be formed in the process. An efficient mechanism for coordination and promotion. The system of employee directors in our country comes from the common decision-making system of German companies, but there are differences in the function of the system, especially in the exertion of its functions. In this sense, The system of employee directors in our country is a new kind of corporate governance that truly embodies the rights and interests of workers and staff in socialist countries of our country. The newly revised Company Law in 2005 makes more explicit provisions on the participation of workers and staff in the board of directors. It provides a good opportunity for promoting the democratic management of staff and workers to be more scientific and standardized, and to perfect and implement the staff director system. However, the operation of employee director system is very difficult in reality, the root of it is the functional mechanism of employee director, and the related legal issues are not clear. Therefore, the introduction and innovation of the employee director system in China must be combined with the actual situation of China itself, and its requirements are in line with the reality of China's existing corporate governance structure and the tradition of legal culture, and carry out scientific system design and innovation. In order to perfect the company legislation, we should establish the governing structure of the board of directors with "three or three systems", increase the proportion of the directors of the staff and workers, realize the balance of power within the board of directors, handle the relationship and coordination between the directors of the staff and the other directors and the board of supervisors, To realize the complementarity of resources and advantages; from the angle of rights and responsibilities, to clarify the specific powers and responsibilities of the directors, such as voting rights, legal liability, compensation mechanism, etc. To improve the specific rules of procedure for staff directors to participate in board meetings, to realize that staff directors really enjoy the right of democratic participation in the management of the company, and to perfect the special training system for staff and workers' directors from the point of view of the legal value, Staff directors are trained to improve their comprehensive quality by means of laws and regulations or articles of association.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.291.91
本文編號：2266259
[Abstract]:Employee director is a kind of special type of director, which has the character, characteristic and role that the general director does not have, that is, the employee director has the "worker nature" which the general director does not have. In particular, the employee director refers to the non-managerial staff and workers who participate in the operation of the company's board of directors in a certain way as workers (not as managers). The purpose of this paper is to realize the diversification, scientization and basicalization of decision-making subjects through the participation of staff and workers in the board of directors, so that the interests of workers and shareholders can be United and unified as far as possible, and a kind of checks and balances will be formed in the process. An efficient mechanism for coordination and promotion. The system of employee directors in our country comes from the common decision-making system of German companies, but there are differences in the function of the system, especially in the exertion of its functions. In this sense, The system of employee directors in our country is a new kind of corporate governance that truly embodies the rights and interests of workers and staff in socialist countries of our country. The newly revised Company Law in 2005 makes more explicit provisions on the participation of workers and staff in the board of directors. It provides a good opportunity for promoting the democratic management of staff and workers to be more scientific and standardized, and to perfect and implement the staff director system. However, the operation of employee director system is very difficult in reality, the root of it is the functional mechanism of employee director, and the related legal issues are not clear. Therefore, the introduction and innovation of the employee director system in China must be combined with the actual situation of China itself, and its requirements are in line with the reality of China's existing corporate governance structure and the tradition of legal culture, and carry out scientific system design and innovation. In order to perfect the company legislation, we should establish the governing structure of the board of directors with "three or three systems", increase the proportion of the directors of the staff and workers, realize the balance of power within the board of directors, handle the relationship and coordination between the directors of the staff and the other directors and the board of supervisors, To realize the complementarity of resources and advantages; from the angle of rights and responsibilities, to clarify the specific powers and responsibilities of the directors, such as voting rights, legal liability, compensation mechanism, etc. To improve the specific rules of procedure for staff directors to participate in board meetings, to realize that staff directors really enjoy the right of democratic participation in the management of the company, and to perfect the special training system for staff and workers' directors from the point of view of the legal value, Staff directors are trained to improve their comprehensive quality by means of laws and regulations or articles of association.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.291.91
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 汪洋;;我國公司法應(yīng)建立職工董事制度[J];創(chuàng)新科技;2004年08期
2 陳向聰;職工參與概念探析[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年01期
3 張榮芳;淺論我國職工民主管理制度的法律完善[J];法學(xué)評論;2000年02期
4 聶德宗;公司法人治理結(jié)構(gòu)的立法模式及發(fā)展趨勢[J];法學(xué)評論;2000年06期
5 楊泰山;;公司制下職代會生存機制的法律探討[J];法制與經(jīng)濟;1997年05期
6 白愛菊;關(guān)于職工董事監(jiān)事身份的理論思考[J];工會理論與實踐.中國工運學(xué)院學(xué)報;2001年04期
7 羅培新;我國職工參與管理之立法缺漏及其完善[J];中央政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;1999年03期
8 周放生;從內(nèi)部人董事會到出資人董事會[J];上海國資;2005年06期
9 馬俊駒,聶德宗;公司法人治理結(jié)構(gòu)的當(dāng)代發(fā)展——兼論我國公司法人治理結(jié)構(gòu)的重構(gòu)[J];法學(xué)研究;2000年02期
10 蔡元慶;論上市公司董事會的監(jiān)督機制[J];深圳大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2002年06期
，本文編號：2266259
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2266259.html
