【摘要】：隱名投資現(xiàn)象的不斷增多,使名目繁多的有關(guān)隱名股東權(quán)益問題所引起的糾紛接連不斷,困惑難解。而有關(guān)有限責(zé)任公司隱名股東股權(quán)繼承問題的出現(xiàn),勢(shì)必會(huì)面臨新的困惑與疑問。一方面,法律沒有對(duì)隱名股東作出明確的規(guī)定,對(duì)于隱名股東的股東資格該如何界定,學(xué)術(shù)界目前還處于比較混亂,爭(zhēng)論不休的局面。另一方面,《公司法》對(duì)股權(quán)繼承問題的規(guī)定,顯得抽象概括也不夠嚴(yán)密,使司法界與學(xué)術(shù)界仍舊各持觀點(diǎn),沒能形成一個(gè)統(tǒng)一的操作標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。這種狀況,面對(duì)隱名股東的股權(quán)可否繼承這個(gè)問題時(shí),還是找不到比較準(zhǔn)確的法律依據(jù)和對(duì)應(yīng)的基礎(chǔ)理論。本文筆者通過案例分析,針對(duì)案例本身需要界定清楚的相關(guān)問題,理論聯(lián)系實(shí)際,層層展開,意圖找到一個(gè)合理有效的處理有關(guān)有限責(zé)任公司隱名股東股權(quán)繼承問題的方案,這是本文的核心內(nèi)容。在此基礎(chǔ)上筆者期望同時(shí)能夠建立起一套行之有效的法律體系,以應(yīng)對(duì)因隱名投資而引起的紛繁復(fù)雜的糾紛,規(guī)范經(jīng)濟(jì)市場(chǎng)。 本文主要分為以下四個(gè)部分展開論述,共計(jì)大約20000字 第一部分從寫作本文的初衷入手,說明了寫作此問題之緣起。首先對(duì)改編案例的基本情況做了概括介紹,以案例所針對(duì)的焦點(diǎn)問題為主線,通過對(duì)案例爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)的分析,提出處理此案急需界定清楚的相關(guān)問題。 第二部分對(duì)股東資格認(rèn)定相關(guān)的問題做了基本論證。先對(duì)股權(quán)性質(zhì)、股東資格的內(nèi)涵及其與股東相互間的關(guān)系做了厘定,在對(duì)此問題分析的基礎(chǔ)上,得出-般情況下股東確權(quán)應(yīng)滿足的基本條件,依此為絮機(jī)理清股東資格認(rèn)定的應(yīng)然標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。為處理與此相關(guān)糾紛提供參照標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及價(jià)值取向。 第三部分是對(duì)隱名股東確權(quán)問題的核心分析,是本文需要理清的重點(diǎn)與難點(diǎn)問題。通過對(duì)隱名股東基本內(nèi)涵與外延的詮釋,明了隱名股東的性質(zhì)。借鑒當(dāng)前立法、理論界與實(shí)務(wù)界應(yīng)對(duì)隱名股東問題的思路,依此啟發(fā),通過對(duì)當(dāng)前主流學(xué)說的考量,推出確認(rèn)隱名股東資格認(rèn)定的具體思路。 第四部分是對(duì)隱名股東股權(quán)繼承問題的闡述分析。首先對(duì)股權(quán)繼承相關(guān)的問題做了綜述,分析規(guī)范化的股權(quán)繼承；再依前面的論斷為基礎(chǔ),結(jié)合股東資格認(rèn)定的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),對(duì)隱名股東股權(quán)繼承需要滿足的要件做了分析,據(jù)此確立隱名股東股權(quán)繼承的途徑,希望為以后司法實(shí)踐中遇到相同或類似的案例提供一些理論上的支撐。 本文筆者以案例分析為基礎(chǔ),結(jié)合學(xué)理和司法實(shí)踐對(duì)案例進(jìn)行綜合探析,試圖找出對(duì)隱名股東資格認(rèn)定及股權(quán)繼承具有普遍指導(dǎo)意義的規(guī)則與具體思路。
[Abstract]:The increasing phenomenon of anonymous investment leads to numerous disputes caused by the rights and interests of hidden shareholders. However, the emergence of stockholders' equity inheritance in limited liability companies is bound to lead to new puzzles and questions. On the one hand, the law does not have a clear stipulation on the dormant shareholders, and the academic circle is still in a confused and controversial situation about how to define the qualification of the dormant shareholders. On the other hand, the provisions of Company Law on equity inheritance are not strict enough, which makes the judicial and academic circles still hold different views and fail to form a unified standard of operation. Faced with the problem of whether the stockholders can inherit, they still can not find the more accurate legal basis and the corresponding basic theory. Through the case analysis, aiming at the relevant problems that need to be clearly defined in the case itself, combining theory with practice, the author tries to find a reasonable and effective scheme to deal with the problem of equity succession of hidden shareholders in limited liability companies. This is the core of this article. On this basis, the author hopes to set up an effective legal system to deal with the complicated disputes caused by anonymous investment and standardize the economic market at the same time. This paper is divided into the following four parts, a total of about 20000 words the first part from the original intention of writing this article, explains the origin of this problem. First of all, the basic situation of the case adaptation is introduced, with the focus of the case as the main line, through the analysis of the focus of the case dispute, the urgent need to deal with the case clearly defined related issues. The second part has made the basic argument to the shareholder qualification related question. First of all, the nature of equity, the connotation of shareholder qualification and the relationship between shareholders and shareholders are determined. On the basis of the analysis of this problem, the basic conditions that shareholders' right of confirmation should be satisfied under normal circumstances are obtained. According to this mechanism clear shareholders qualification should be the standard. To provide reference standards and value orientation for dealing with related disputes. The third part is the core analysis of implicit shareholders' right of confirmation, which is the focus and difficulty of this paper. Through the interpretation of the basic connotation and extension of the dormant shareholders, the nature of the dormant shareholders is understood. Drawing lessons from the current legislation, the theoretical and practical circles should deal with the problem of anonymous shareholders, according to this inspiration, through the consideration of the current mainstream theory, the author puts forward the specific idea of confirming the qualification of the dormant shareholders. The fourth part is to explain and analyze the stock right inheritance of hidden shareholders. First of all, it summarizes the problems related to equity inheritance, analyzes the standardized equity inheritance, and then according to the previous judgment, combined with the criteria of shareholder qualification, the paper analyzes the requirements to be satisfied by anonymous shareholders' equity inheritance. Based on this, it is hoped to provide some theoretical support for the same or similar cases encountered in judicial practice in the future. On the basis of case analysis, the author tries to find out the rules and concrete ideas which have universal guiding significance to the qualification of dormant shareholders and the inheritance of shares by combining the theory of theory and judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 王俊華;;試析隱名投資者的股東資格認(rèn)定[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年10期

2 郝朝暉;股權(quán)若干問題淺析[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);1999年02期

3 古錫麟;李洪堂;;股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓若干審判實(shí)務(wù)問題[J];法律適用;2007年03期

4 樓曉;;論“出資”“股份”“股權(quán)”及“股東資格”間的法律關(guān)系——以有限責(zé)任公司為論述基點(diǎn)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年02期

5 江平,孔祥俊;論股權(quán)[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);1994年01期

6 錢明星;論公司財(cái)產(chǎn)與公司財(cái)產(chǎn)所有權(quán)、股東股權(quán)[J];中國(guó)人民大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1998年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 劉敏;[N];人民法院報(bào);2003年

，

本文編號(hào)：2262621