發(fā)布時間：2018-09-09 11:13

【摘要】：異議股東股份回購請求權制度作為“資本多數決”表決機制下對公司中處于弱勢地位的中小股東的重要救濟措施由來已久,在經濟全球化水平迅速提高、重大經濟活動日益頻繁的當今社會,該項制度在世界上多個國家和地區(qū)得到了更為廣泛的運用。在部分國家和地區(qū),異議股東股份回購請求權的相關立法已經發(fā)展得較為完備,在實踐中為對公司重大經營決策持有異議的股東提供了有效的退出路徑和經濟補償。而我國自2005年《公司法》首次確立了異議股東股份回購請求權制度以來,相關立法一直處于近乎停滯的狀態(tài),異議股東股份回購請求權的行使僅有《公司法》第75條和第143條的簡單規(guī)定作為指導和依據。 本文通過大量分析我國異議股東股份回購請求權實踐中的真實案例,針對性地總結出異議股東股份回購請求權在我國行使過程中存在的疑難問題及其成因。為了解決這些問題,本文進行了詳細的比較法分析,通過對比和借鑒其他國家和地區(qū)的相關先進立法,對我國的異議股東股份回購請求權立法和司法實踐提出了完善的建議,從而解決了相應的權利行使疑難問題。 本文共分為三個部分： 第一部分從我國異議股東股份回購請求權實踐中的真實案例入手,通過分析具體案件中存在的疑難與爭議,總結出異議股東股份回購請求權在我國正遭遇著不完全股權股東的主體地位不明、權利適用事項涵蓋范圍不足、權利行使程序粗陋、缺乏明確的股份回購價格確定機制以及與債權人利益保護產生沖突等重要問題。 第二部分為了解決上述問題,以異議股東股份回購請求權據以產生的法律及經濟學理論為基礎,深入研究美國、加拿大、日本、韓國等國家和地區(qū)的相關立法,以異議股東股份回購請求權的行使主體、適用范圍、行使程序以及股份回購價格的評估機制為視點,選取并吸收其中適合我國現階段實際情況的立法經驗。 第三部分在大量我國實際案例以及比較法分析的基礎之上,對我國的異議股東股份回購請求權制度提出了明確權利適用主體、擴大權利適用范圍、完善權利行使程序、確定股份回購價格計算方法以及加強債權人利益保護的立法建議,以期解決我國異議股東股份回購請求權行使中存在的疑難問題。同時還對現階段我國的相關司法實踐提出了改進的方式,以促使該項制度更加有效地發(fā)揮對中小股東的利益保護作用,提高公司經營決策的效率,并最終對我國經濟的持續(xù)繁榮發(fā)展貢獻力量。
[Abstract]:As an important relief measure to the minority shareholders in the weak position of the company under the voting mechanism of "capital majority decision", the system of claim for share repurchase of dissenting shareholders has a long history, and has rapidly improved in the level of economic globalization. With the increasing frequency of major economic activities, this system has been widely used in many countries and regions in the world. In some countries and regions, the relevant legislation on the right of share repurchase of dissenting shareholders has been developed relatively well. In practice, it provides effective exit path and economic compensation for shareholders who disagree with the major business decisions of the company. However, since 2005, when the Company Law established the system of claim for share repurchase of dissenting shareholders for the first time, the relevant legislation has been in a state of near stagnation. The exercise of dissenting shareholders' right to repurchase shares is guided and based on the simple provisions of articles 75 and 143 of the Company Law. By analyzing a large number of real cases in the practice of the right of share repurchase of dissenting shareholders in China, this paper sums up the difficult problems and their causes in the exercise of the right of repurchase of shares of dissenting shareholders in our country. In order to solve these problems, this paper has carried on the detailed comparative law analysis, through contrasts and draws lessons from other countries and regions related advanced legislation, has put forward the consummate suggestion to our country's dissent shareholder's share repurchase right legislation and the judicial practice. Thus solved the corresponding rights exercise difficult problem. This paper is divided into three parts: the first part begins with the real cases in the practice of the right of the dissenting shareholders to repurchase shares, through the analysis of the problems and disputes existing in the specific cases. It is concluded that the claim for share repurchase of dissenting shareholders in China is encountering the unclear status of the main body of the incomplete stockholders, the lack of coverage of the applicable items of rights, and the crude procedures for the exercise of rights. Lack of a clear mechanism to determine the share repurchase price and conflicts with the protection of creditors' interests and other important issues. In the second part, in order to solve the above problems, based on the legal and economic theories on which the dissenting shareholders' claim for share repurchase is based, the relevant legislation of the United States, Canada, Japan, South Korea and other countries and regions are studied in depth. From the point of view of the main body, the scope of application, the exercise procedure and the evaluation mechanism of the share repurchase price of the dissenting shareholders, the author selects and absorbs the legislative experience suitable for the actual situation of our country at the present stage. In the third part, on the basis of a large number of actual cases and comparative law analysis, the author puts forward a clear subject of right application, expands the scope of application of rights, and consummates the procedure of exercise of rights in our country's system of dissenting shareholders' right to repurchase shares. To determine the calculation method of share repurchase price and to strengthen the protection of creditors' interests in order to solve the difficult problems existing in the exercise of the right of dissenting shareholders to repurchase shares in our country. At the same time, it also puts forward the way to improve the relevant judicial practice of our country at the present stage, in order to urge this system to play the role of protecting the interests of the minority shareholders more effectively, and to improve the efficiency of the company's management decision. And ultimately contribute to the sustained prosperity and development of our economy.
【學位授予單位】：復旦大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前4條

1 董帝鑾;;論有限責任公司股東退股權制度——兼評《公司法》第七十五條[J];重慶三峽學院學報;2011年01期

2 張愛菊;;論有限責任公司異議股東股份回購請求權[J];河南省政法管理干部學院學報;2011年01期

3 路曉紅;;淺論異議股東股份回購請求權[J];銅陵職業(yè)技術學院學報;2011年01期

4 黃愛學;;有限公司股東退股制度立法評析——兼評公司法第75條之規(guī)定[J];新疆大學學報(哲學人文社會科學版);2009年04期

，

本文編號：2232212