公司僵局法律救濟(jì)制度研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-09-06 18:31
【摘要】：我國(guó)2006年1月1日起實(shí)施的新《公司法》第183條規(guī)定了“司法解散公司”的制度,打破了我國(guó)對(duì)公司僵局司法救濟(jì)的立法空白,標(biāo)志著我國(guó)司法調(diào)整開始正式介入公司僵局問(wèn)題的解決,這在立法上是一個(gè)重大的突破。然而,總體來(lái)看,由于我國(guó)立法關(guān)于公司僵局的理論明顯準(zhǔn)備不足,現(xiàn)行公司法對(duì)公司僵局的規(guī)制仍缺乏體系性的構(gòu)建,遺漏較多,可操作性差。因此,尋找公司僵局的司法救濟(jì)途徑就成為公司法理論研究和實(shí)務(wù)探索的重要議題。 公司僵局產(chǎn)生于相對(duì)的兩派力量對(duì)抗之中,主要表現(xiàn)在公司決策機(jī)制明顯滯后,導(dǎo)致的后果是公司經(jīng)營(yíng)陷入癱瘓,進(jìn)而使公司及股東的利益受到損害。西方諸國(guó)應(yīng)對(duì)公司僵局問(wèn)題已有近百年歷史,其經(jīng)驗(yàn)可為我國(guó)構(gòu)建公司僵局制度提供經(jīng)驗(yàn)和借鑒。本文圍繞公司僵局法律問(wèn)題,較為深入地分析了公司僵局的概念、特征、形成原因以及危害性,通過(guò)比較法學(xué)的分析方法,比較研習(xí)了國(guó)外先進(jìn)國(guó)家解決公司僵局的立法和司法經(jīng)驗(yàn),對(duì)我國(guó)公司解散制度進(jìn)行法理分析,在此基礎(chǔ)探討我國(guó)公司僵局的法律應(yīng)對(duì)。 全文分為三個(gè)部分: 第一部分論述公司僵局的基本問(wèn)題。這一部分對(duì)公司僵局的理論背景、涵義及分類進(jìn)行了總結(jié)性概括。本部分不僅對(duì)公司僵局危害性進(jìn)行了較為細(xì)致的評(píng)析,而且就公司僵局司法救濟(jì)的法理基礎(chǔ)、必要性和法律意義進(jìn)行了評(píng)述。第二部分是比較分析域外公司僵局法律救濟(jì)制度的立法現(xiàn)狀及其先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn),這里主要分析了英美法系中英國(guó)和美國(guó)以及大陸法系中的德國(guó)和日本在公司僵局問(wèn)題上立法特點(diǎn),通過(guò)中西不同的立法比較,進(jìn)行了比較法研究。第三部分針對(duì)我國(guó)公司僵局法律救濟(jì)制度的現(xiàn)狀深入分析了我國(guó)公司僵局法律救濟(jì)制度的缺陷與不足,同時(shí)提出了對(duì)完善我國(guó)公司僵局法律救濟(jì)體系的構(gòu)想。
[Abstract]:Article 183 of the New Company Law, which came into effect on January 1, 2006, stipulates the system of "judicial dissolution of company", which breaks the legislative blank of judicial relief to the deadlock of companies in our country. It marks the beginning of judicial adjustment in our country to resolve the problem of corporate deadlock, which is a major breakthrough in legislation. However, on the whole, due to the lack of preparation for the theory of corporate deadlock in our country's legislation, the regulation of corporate deadlock in the current company law is still lack of systematic construction, more omissions and poor maneuverability. Therefore, looking for the judicial remedy of corporate deadlock has become an important topic in the theoretical research and practical exploration of company law. The corporate deadlock arises from the relative confrontation between the two forces, which is mainly reflected in the obvious lag of the decision-making mechanism of the company, which results in the paralysis of the company's management and the damage to the interests of the company and its shareholders. The western countries have been dealing with the corporate deadlock for nearly a hundred years, and their experience can provide experience and reference for the construction of the corporate deadlock system in China. Focusing on the legal problems of corporate deadlock, this paper deeply analyzes the concept, characteristics, causes and harmfulness of corporate deadlock. This paper compares and studies the legislative and judicial experiences of foreign advanced countries in resolving the corporate deadlock, analyzes the legal principles of the dissolution system of Chinese companies, and probes into the legal countermeasures of the corporate deadlock in our country on this basis. The paper is divided into three parts: the first part discusses the basic problems of corporate deadlock. This part summarizes the theoretical background, meaning and classification of corporate deadlock. This part not only makes a detailed analysis on the harmfulness of corporate deadlock, but also comments on the legal basis, necessity and legal significance of the judicial remedy of corporate deadlock. The second part is a comparative analysis of the legislative status and advanced experience of the extraterritorial legal relief system of corporate deadlock. This part mainly analyzes the legislative characteristics of the Anglo-American legal system in the United Kingdom and the United States and Germany and Japan in the continental law system in the corporate deadlock. Through the comparison of different legislations between China and the West, the comparative law is studied. In the third part, according to the current situation of the legal remedy system of the corporate deadlock in our country, the defects and deficiencies of the legal relief system of the corporate deadlock in our country are deeply analyzed, and the conception of perfecting the legal relief system of the corporate deadlock in our country is put forward at the same time.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91
本文編號(hào)：2227172
[Abstract]:Article 183 of the New Company Law, which came into effect on January 1, 2006, stipulates the system of "judicial dissolution of company", which breaks the legislative blank of judicial relief to the deadlock of companies in our country. It marks the beginning of judicial adjustment in our country to resolve the problem of corporate deadlock, which is a major breakthrough in legislation. However, on the whole, due to the lack of preparation for the theory of corporate deadlock in our country's legislation, the regulation of corporate deadlock in the current company law is still lack of systematic construction, more omissions and poor maneuverability. Therefore, looking for the judicial remedy of corporate deadlock has become an important topic in the theoretical research and practical exploration of company law. The corporate deadlock arises from the relative confrontation between the two forces, which is mainly reflected in the obvious lag of the decision-making mechanism of the company, which results in the paralysis of the company's management and the damage to the interests of the company and its shareholders. The western countries have been dealing with the corporate deadlock for nearly a hundred years, and their experience can provide experience and reference for the construction of the corporate deadlock system in China. Focusing on the legal problems of corporate deadlock, this paper deeply analyzes the concept, characteristics, causes and harmfulness of corporate deadlock. This paper compares and studies the legislative and judicial experiences of foreign advanced countries in resolving the corporate deadlock, analyzes the legal principles of the dissolution system of Chinese companies, and probes into the legal countermeasures of the corporate deadlock in our country on this basis. The paper is divided into three parts: the first part discusses the basic problems of corporate deadlock. This part summarizes the theoretical background, meaning and classification of corporate deadlock. This part not only makes a detailed analysis on the harmfulness of corporate deadlock, but also comments on the legal basis, necessity and legal significance of the judicial remedy of corporate deadlock. The second part is a comparative analysis of the legislative status and advanced experience of the extraterritorial legal relief system of corporate deadlock. This part mainly analyzes the legislative characteristics of the Anglo-American legal system in the United Kingdom and the United States and Germany and Japan in the continental law system in the corporate deadlock. Through the comparison of different legislations between China and the West, the comparative law is studied. In the third part, according to the current situation of the legal remedy system of the corporate deadlock in our country, the defects and deficiencies of the legal relief system of the corporate deadlock in our country are deeply analyzed, and the conception of perfecting the legal relief system of the corporate deadlock in our country is put forward at the same time.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 羅培新;;填補(bǔ)公司合同“縫隙”——司法介入公司運(yùn)作的一個(gè)分析框架[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期
2 楊明;;請(qǐng)求權(quán)、私權(quán)救濟(jì)與民事權(quán)利體系[J];比較法研究;2007年04期
3 劉敏;;關(guān)于股東請(qǐng)求解散公司之訴若干問(wèn)題的思考[J];法律適用;2006年10期
4 宋從文;;公司章程的合同解讀[J];法律適用;2007年02期
5 楊秀清;;論司法過(guò)程的權(quán)利生成功能 以民事權(quán)利救濟(jì)為視角的分析[J];法律適用;2007年11期
6 鮑為民;美國(guó)法上的公司僵局處理制度及其啟示[J];法商研究;2005年03期
7 蔣大興;;公司自治與裁判寬容——新《公司法》視野下的裁判思維[J];法學(xué)家;2006年06期
8 王仁富;;公司司法解散制度探析——兼評(píng)我國(guó)新公司法第183條[J];中國(guó)工商管理研究;2007年04期
9 萬(wàn)國(guó)華;原俊婧;;論破解公司僵局之路徑選擇及其對(duì)公司治理的影響——兼論新《公司法》第75條和第183條之公司治理解讀[J];河北法學(xué);2007年04期
10 黃長(zhǎng)營(yíng);譚素青;;公司僵局司法強(qiáng)制解散程序初探[J];河北法學(xué);2007年06期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條
1 廣東省佛山市禪城區(qū)人民法院 孫謙 李舒嘯;[N];人民法院報(bào);2006年
，本文編號(hào)：2227172
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2227172.html
最近更新
教材專著
