【摘要】：自改革開放以來,我國家族企業(yè)占民營企業(yè)總數(shù)的90%之多,而民營企業(yè)又占國民經(jīng)濟(jì)總量的63%以上。但由于家族企業(yè)控制權(quán)行使不當(dāng),致使家族企業(yè)的存活壽命平均只有2.9年,因此“富不過三代”的宿命論調(diào)在社會上廣為流傳。家族企業(yè)發(fā)展之快卻又存活率低下,不僅在社會上造成了負(fù)面影響,而且還極大地浪費(fèi)了稀缺的經(jīng)濟(jì)資源,這種情況應(yīng)當(dāng)引起全社會的高度關(guān)注。本文就是以家族企業(yè)控制權(quán)行使不當(dāng),經(jīng)濟(jì)利益非公眾化使企業(yè)留不住人才,經(jīng)營管理非社會化使企業(yè)所需技術(shù)匱乏,傳統(tǒng)的控制權(quán)行使方式與現(xiàn)代企業(yè)制度不能很好地進(jìn)行規(guī)制,導(dǎo)致企業(yè)宿命論的問題進(jìn)行探討。文章共分4個部分： 第一部分主要介紹：家族企業(yè)控制權(quán)與企業(yè)的經(jīng)營管理。文章主要闡述家族企業(yè)應(yīng)當(dāng)擁有控制權(quán),并按《公司法》規(guī)定科學(xué)設(shè)置控制權(quán)的必要性；家族企業(yè)只有擁有并且恰當(dāng)實(shí)施控制權(quán),企業(yè)才能生存并得以發(fā)展壯大。 第二部分主要介紹：家族企業(yè)控制權(quán)不當(dāng)行使的后果。文章主要闡述家族企業(yè)的創(chuàng)業(yè)者過渡行使控制權(quán)、怠于行使控制權(quán)、任意行使控制權(quán)的實(shí)際案例及現(xiàn)象,這種情況導(dǎo)致了企業(yè)壽命短暫的嚴(yán)重后果。 第三部分主要介紹：家族企業(yè)不當(dāng)行使控制權(quán)的原因分析。文章主要闡述家族企業(yè)的創(chuàng)業(yè)者,是由于什么原因不能科學(xué)設(shè)置并恰當(dāng)實(shí)施控制權(quán),對失控事例進(jìn)行深入淺出的分析,從中找出導(dǎo)致企業(yè)宿命論的原因。 第四部分主要介紹：家族企業(yè)控制權(quán)與現(xiàn)代企業(yè)制度的規(guī)制。文章主要闡述家族企業(yè)的創(chuàng)業(yè)者,應(yīng)當(dāng)從企業(yè)宿命論的誤區(qū)中走出來,采取切實(shí)可行的舉措,抓住當(dāng)前改革開放的大好時機(jī),將企業(yè)做大做強(qiáng),培育出百年老店。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, the family enterprises account for 90% of the total number of private enterprises, and private enterprises account for more than 63% of the total national economy. However, due to the improper exercise of family business control, the average survival life of family business is only 2.9 years, so the fatalism of "rich but three generations" is widely spread in society. The rapid development but low survival rate of family enterprises not only have a negative impact on society, but also waste scarce economic resources, which should be highly concerned by the whole society. This article is based on the improper exercise of the control rights of the family enterprises, the non-public economic benefits, the inability of enterprises to retain talents, and the lack of technology needed by enterprises due to the non-socialization of management and management. The traditional exercise of control right and modern enterprise system can not be well regulated, leading to the problem of enterprise fatalism. The article is divided into four parts: the first part mainly introduces: family business control and business management. This paper mainly expounds the necessity that family enterprises should have control rights and set up control rights scientifically according to the company law, and that family enterprises can survive and develop only if they have and properly implement the control rights. The second part mainly introduces the consequences of improper exercise of family business control. This paper mainly expounds the practical cases and phenomena of family business entrepreneurs who exercise control power in transition and are lazy to exercise control power. This situation leads to the severe consequences of the short life of the enterprise. The third part mainly introduces: the family business improper exercise control power reason analysis. This paper mainly expounds the reasons why the entrepreneurs of the family business can not be set up scientifically and properly implement the control right, analyzes the case of out of control, and finds out the reasons leading to the fatalism of the enterprise. The fourth part mainly introduces: the family firm control right and the modern enterprise system regulation. This paper mainly expounds that the entrepreneurs of family enterprises should come out of the misunderstanding of enterprise fatalism, take practical measures, seize the good opportunity of current reform and opening up, make the enterprises bigger and stronger, and cultivate a century-old shop.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李釗;;公司控制權(quán)的法律規(guī)制[J];法制與社會;2010年30期

2 江守仁;寧蔚;;企業(yè)集團(tuán)母子公司管理關(guān)系的思索[J];公用事業(yè)財會;2003年04期

3 胡智強(qiáng);;我國上市公司股東權(quán)利配置——以公司控制權(quán)為視角[J];南京審計學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年02期

4 趙芳;企業(yè)文化在韓國[J];企業(yè)文明;2003年11期

5 范琦;毛程連;;上市公司控制權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的市場因應(yīng):1995～2009樣本[J];改革;2010年05期

6 雷瑩;;論公司法人治理結(jié)構(gòu)之完善——基于監(jiān)事會和獨(dú)立董事功能協(xié)調(diào)的視角分析[J];大眾商務(wù);2010年16期

7 許萍;鄭曉鴻;;我國上市公司控制權(quán)市場資源配置效率研究[J];商業(yè)時代;2010年01期

8 王浩;盧勃;;建筑業(yè)企業(yè)集團(tuán)母子公司管理模式的選擇分析[J];鐵道工程企業(yè)管理;2005年05期

9 葉國富;;淺談規(guī)范公司法人治理結(jié)構(gòu)運(yùn)作機(jī)制問題[J];鐵道工程企業(yè)管理;2005年05期

10 吳興華;;民營企業(yè)引進(jìn)職業(yè)經(jīng)理人的信任博弈[J];雞西大學(xué)學(xué)報;2009年05期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 陽健 谷唐企業(yè)管理咨詢有限公司副總經(jīng)理;[N];東莞日報;2010年

，

本文編號：2192991