【摘要】：對我國現(xiàn)行法律中對企業(yè)法人目的范圍的限制作了多角度的分析。從公司法來看 ,早期確立的“越圍原則”在后來的發(fā)展中已被證明對于保護股東和債權(quán)人利益之不力。從民法的一般原理看 ,對企業(yè)法人目的范圍的限制 ,本質(zhì)上是對企業(yè)法人之法定代表人的代表權(quán)的限制 ,與企業(yè)法人行為之效力無關(guān)。站在公法的角度 ,目的范圍之決定是企業(yè)法人的當然權(quán)利 ,國家權(quán)力的過多干預(yù)將有悖于社會主義市場經(jīng)濟的基本精神。
[Abstract]:This paper analyzes the limitation of the scope of the purpose of the enterprise legal person in the current law of our country. From the company law, the early established "the principle of circumference" has been proved to be ineffective in protecting the interests of shareholders and creditors in the later development. From the general principle of the civil law, the limitation of the scope of the purpose of the enterprise legal person is essentially the restriction on the representation of the legal representative of the enterprise legal person, and it has nothing to do with the validity of the enterprise legal person's act. From the angle of public law, the decision of the scope of the purpose is the natural right of the enterprise legal person, and the excessive interference of the state power will run counter to the basic spirit of the socialist market economy.
【作者單位】： 暨南大學(xué)法學(xué)院 暨南大學(xué)管理學(xué)院
【分類號】：D922.29

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王春梅;論公司的對外擔保能力[D];西南政法大學(xué);2004年

2 徐虎;論公益信托[D];安徽大學(xué);2003年

，

本文編號：2181127