本文選題：股東知情權(quán) + 查閱權(quán)�。� 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 在現(xiàn)代公司管理制度中,奉行法人所有權(quán)、經(jīng)營權(quán)與股東權(quán)相分離的原則,大多數(shù)股東并不直接參與公司的經(jīng)營管理,董事會和經(jīng)理層掌握著公司的日常經(jīng)營和決策,這往往會導(dǎo)致股東與公司間信息的不對稱,從而危及股東利益的實現(xiàn)。賦予股東知情權(quán)是克服信息不對稱的有力措施,股東知情權(quán)是多項股東權(quán)利的集合,主要包含查閱權(quán)、質(zhì)詢權(quán)和檢查人選任請求權(quán)三項權(quán)利,其目的是為保障股東對公司有關(guān)信息的知曉,以實現(xiàn)對各項股東權(quán)利的預(yù)防性保護,此項制度具有重要的法律價值和現(xiàn)實意義。 然而,由于我國公司治理機制的失靈和相關(guān)法律制度的缺失,導(dǎo)致我國股東知情權(quán)長期得不到應(yīng)有的保護,因此引發(fā)的股東知情糾紛不斷涌現(xiàn),如何在我國建立較為完善的股東知情權(quán)制度,如何為股東知情權(quán)提供切實的保障等問題,成為了學(xué)界和實務(wù)界共同關(guān)注的焦點。盡管我國2005年修訂的《公司法》對股東知情權(quán)的保護已取得長足進步,但仍存在不足之處,例如：股東查閱權(quán)范圍過窄、質(zhì)詢權(quán)的范圍和具體程序的適用沒有詳細規(guī)定、檢查人選任請求權(quán)更是我國立法上的空白。通過分析股東知情權(quán)的內(nèi)容和法律屬性,同時結(jié)合對股東知情權(quán)典型案例的剖析,我國股東知情權(quán)制度在立法、司法和執(zhí)法方面的缺陷便露出其“冰山一角”。 針對當前股東知情制度的不足之處,我國可借鑒國外先進的立法,主要從以下幾方面進行完善：擴大股東查閱權(quán)范圍,明確股東查閱權(quán)的行使要件；確定股東質(zhì)詢權(quán)的權(quán)利主體和質(zhì)詢范圍,確立股東質(zhì)詢權(quán)的義務(wù)主體及說明程度；建立檢查人選任請求權(quán)制度。通過這些完善措施,我國股東知情權(quán)制度能更加合理與健全。
[Abstract]:In the modern company management system, the principle of the separation of the ownership of legal person, the right of management and the right of shareholders is followed. Most shareholders do not directly participate in the management of the company, and the board of directors and managers control the daily operation and decision of the company. This often leads to asymmetric information between shareholders and companies, thus endangering the realization of shareholders' interests. Giving shareholders the right to know is a powerful measure to overcome the asymmetry of information. Shareholders' right to know is a collection of many shareholders' rights, which mainly include three rights: the right to consult, the right to inquire and the right to choose and claim for appointment of inspectors. The purpose of the system is to protect the shareholders' knowledge of the company's relevant information and to realize the preventive protection of the shareholders' rights. This system has important legal value and practical significance. However, due to the failure of corporate governance mechanism and the lack of relevant legal system, the shareholders' right to know in our country has not been protected for a long time. How to establish a more perfect system of shareholders' right to know and how to provide practical protection for shareholders' right to know have become the focus of the academic and practical circles. Although great progress has been made in the protection of shareholders' right to know in the revised Company Law in 2005, there are still some shortcomings, such as the narrow scope of shareholders' right to inspect, the scope of inquiry rights and the application of specific procedures. The right to choose and apply for appointment of inspectors is a blank in our legislation. By analyzing the contents and legal attributes of shareholders' right to know, and combining with the analysis of typical cases of shareholders' right to know, the defects of the system of shareholders' right to know in legislation, judicature and law enforcement show its "tip of iceberg". In view of the deficiency of the current shareholders' informed system, our country can learn from foreign advanced legislation, mainly from the following aspects: expand the scope of shareholders' inspection rights, clear the exercise of shareholders' inspection rights; To determine the main body and scope of the shareholders' right to inquire, to establish the subject of obligation and the degree of explanation of the right to inquire, and to establish the system of the right to choose and claim for appointment of examiners. Through these consummation measures, our country stockholder's right to know system can be more reasonable and perfect.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳高臣;;股東查閱權(quán)研究[J];當代法學(xué);2007年01期

2 宋良剛;股東知情權(quán)的法律保護——北京××公司股東知情權(quán)糾紛案[J];法律適用;2005年05期

3 宋從文;;股東知情權(quán)行使與限制之維[J];法律適用;2009年07期

4 陳開梓;;股東知情權(quán)糾紛司法救濟之探討[J];河北科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年01期

5 宋忠勝;試論股東權(quán)的法律保護[J];經(jīng)濟與管理;1999年04期

6 于瑩;;股東查閱權(quán)法律問題研究[J];吉林大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2008年02期

7 劉玉杰;論股東的賬簿查閱權(quán)[J];會計研究;2004年03期

8 王燕莉;;論股東賬簿查閱權(quán)行使之正當目的[J];四川師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年02期

9 魏曉菲;;試論我國股東知情權(quán)的保護問題[J];山東教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年06期

10 李建偉;;論英國公司股東知情權(quán)制度[J];社會科學(xué);2009年12期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 酈燕冰;論新《公司法》對股東知情權(quán)的保護[D];對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號：1959296