本文選題：股東 + 股東代表訴訟�。� 參考：《太原科技大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 2005年10月27日,第十屆全國(guó)人大常委會(huì)第十八次會(huì)議修改通過(guò)了新的《公司法》。在其第152條中作出了賦予股東提起代表訴訟權(quán)利的規(guī)定,正式引入了股東代表訴訟。該制度的確立填補(bǔ)了我國(guó)在這方面立法上的空白,產(chǎn)生了積極而又深遠(yuǎn)的影響。但是,近幾年來(lái),從我國(guó)股東代表訴訟案件的司法實(shí)踐現(xiàn)狀上來(lái)看,我國(guó)關(guān)于股東代表訴訟的規(guī)定還是過(guò)于原則,且可操作性并不強(qiáng)。特別是在股東代表訴訟當(dāng)事人方面仍然存在許多不足之處,而當(dāng)事人制度又是股東代表訴訟制度的基石,當(dāng)事人法律地位設(shè)置是否合理、嚴(yán)密,直接關(guān)系到股東代表訴訟功能的發(fā)揮,所以,對(duì)股東代表訴訟當(dāng)事人制度的完善就顯得尤為的迫切和必要。 本文主要通過(guò)比較研究方法,比較并分析了國(guó)外兩大法系關(guān)于股東代表訴訟當(dāng)事人制度的立法和司法實(shí)踐,歸納了國(guó)內(nèi)眾多學(xué)者、專家的理論分析,進(jìn)一步反思了我國(guó)立法上的缺失和不足,并對(duì)我國(guó)建立合理、可行的股東代表訴訟當(dāng)事人制度作了一些分析和探討,期望為我國(guó)股東代表訴訟當(dāng)事人制度的完善與發(fā)展盡一份微薄之力。本文分為四個(gè)部分加以論述。 第一章分析和論述了股東代表訴訟的基本理論,本章首先介紹了股東代表訴訟的概念、特征、起源及歷史發(fā)展,然后對(duì)股東代表訴訟與直接訴訟作了比較和分析,最后重點(diǎn)探討了股東代表訴訟的功能。 第二章分析和比較了國(guó)外股東代表訴訟當(dāng)事人制度,重點(diǎn)介紹了國(guó)外股東代表訴訟中原告資格的確定,被告的范圍,其他股東和公司的法律地位,以及原告股東提起代表訴訟的激勵(lì)措施和制約措施。 第三章分析和論述了我國(guó)股東代表訴訟當(dāng)事人制度的立法和司法實(shí)踐,并對(duì)2005年《公司法》修改前后的情況作了比較分析,在肯定我國(guó)股東代表當(dāng)事人制度的建立已取得一定進(jìn)步的基礎(chǔ)上指出目前存在的不足和缺陷。 第四章分析和論述了完善股東代表訴訟當(dāng)事人制度的重要意義和指導(dǎo)思想,并有針對(duì)性的對(duì)我國(guó)股東代表訴訟當(dāng)事人制度存在的缺陷和不足提出了具體的完善措施。
[Abstract]:On October 27, 2005, the 18 th meeting of the standing Committee of the Tenth National people's Congress amended and adopted the new Company Law. In its article 152, it gives shareholders the right to bring representative action, and formally introduces shareholder representative action. The establishment of this system has filled the gap in our country's legislation in this respect, and has had a positive and far-reaching impact. However, in recent years, judging from the current situation of judicial practice of shareholder representative litigation cases in China, the provisions on shareholder representative litigation in China are still too principle, and the operability is not strong. In particular, there are still many deficiencies in the shareholders' representative litigation, and the party system is the cornerstone of the shareholder's representative litigation system, whether the parties' legal status is reasonable and strict, It is directly related to the function of shareholder representative litigation, so it is urgent and necessary to perfect the system of shareholder representative litigant. This paper compares and analyzes the legislative and judicial practice of shareholder representative litigant system in two legal systems of foreign countries, and summarizes the theoretical analysis of many domestic scholars and experts. This paper further reflects on the deficiencies and deficiencies in our legislation, and makes some analysis and discussion on the establishment of a reasonable and feasible system of litigant parties in shareholder representative litigation in our country. It is expected to contribute to the improvement and development of shareholder representative litigant system in China. This article is divided into four parts to discuss. The first chapter analyzes and discusses the basic theory of shareholder representative action. This chapter first introduces the concept, characteristics, origin and historical development of shareholder representative action, and then compares and analyzes the shareholder representative action and direct action. Finally, the function of shareholder representative litigation is discussed. The second chapter analyzes and compares the litigant system of foreign shareholders' representative litigation, focusing on the determination of the plaintiff's qualification, the scope of the defendant, the legal status of other shareholders and companies, As well as plaintiff shareholder to initiate representative action the incentive measure and restriction measure. The third chapter analyzes and discusses the legislative and judicial practice of the shareholder representative litigant system in China, and makes a comparative analysis of the situation before and after the amendment of the Company Law in 2005. On the basis of affirming that the establishment of shareholder representative party system in our country has made some progress, this paper points out the shortcomings and defects at present. The fourth chapter analyzes and discusses the significance and guiding ideology of perfecting the shareholder representative litigant system, and puts forward the concrete consummation measures to the defect and insufficiency of the shareholder representative litigant system in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：太原科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 高娟;股東代表訴訟制約機(jī)制研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1944831