本文選題：民事主體 + 民事訴訟主體��； 參考：《燕山大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】：目前我國企業(yè)法人吊銷營業(yè)執(zhí)照后訴訟主體資格的確定缺乏清晰、統(tǒng)一的法律依據(jù),《民法》與《民事訴訟法》、《公司法》、《公司登記管理條例》等法律間矛盾突出,企業(yè)吊銷營業(yè)執(zhí)照后在《民法》上沒有主體資格,但在《民事訴訟法》上有主體資格,其他相關(guān)部門法也都承認(rèn)其主體資格,同一個體的民事主體資格與民事訴訟主體資格卻不統(tǒng)一,本論文針對這一情況,研究分析了我國現(xiàn)行法律以及國際相關(guān)法律中對民事主體與民事訴訟主體規(guī)定所采取的有限分離主義或兩主體不統(tǒng)一的現(xiàn)狀及其歷史淵源,具體分析我國民事訴訟主體制度自身等方面存在的問題,提出民事主體與民事訴訟主體應(yīng)當(dāng)保持統(tǒng)一,應(yīng)當(dāng)盡快制定統(tǒng)一民法典的觀點。 企業(yè)法人作為一類重要的民事主體,吊銷營業(yè)執(zhí)照對企業(yè)法人民事主體資格與民事訴訟主體資格會產(chǎn)生怎樣的影響和應(yīng)該產(chǎn)生怎樣的影響?本文結(jié)合營業(yè)執(zhí)照相關(guān)法律規(guī)定,研究分析其性質(zhì)和功能,從五個方面對企業(yè)吊銷營業(yè)執(zhí)照的原因進(jìn)行列舉和分析,并對司法實踐中較普遍存在的兩種情況(企業(yè)被吊銷營業(yè)執(zhí)照和被注銷)運用歸納法和演繹法做了重點比較和詳細(xì)的闡述和討論。提出法律應(yīng)當(dāng)明確規(guī)定企業(yè)民事主體資格和經(jīng)營資格取得喪失的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),營業(yè)執(zhí)照應(yīng)當(dāng)是企業(yè)法人經(jīng)營資格的表征,喪失營業(yè)執(zhí)照并不直接使企業(yè)失去民事主體資格。第四部分就企業(yè)清算債權(quán)債務(wù)中訴訟主體的確定問題,從清算前、清算中和清算后企業(yè)法人性質(zhì)的變化與訴訟主體確定關(guān)系角度,對企業(yè)法人民事主體資格、訴訟主體資格分析總結(jié),提出了喪失營業(yè)執(zhí)照的企業(yè)法人有效參與相關(guān)訴訟的幾方面措施和解決辦法。文章最后對我國吊銷營業(yè)執(zhí)照相關(guān)制度方面提出了兩點建議。
[Abstract]:At present, there is a lack of clear and unified legal basis for the determination of the qualification of the subject of litigation after the revocation of the business license of the enterprise legal person in our country. The contradiction between the Civil Law and the Civil procedure Law, the regulations on the Administration of Company Registration, and so on is prominent. After the business license of an enterprise is revoked, there is no subject qualification in the Civil Law, but there is a subject qualification in the Civil procedure Law, and other relevant departmental laws also recognize the subject qualification. The civil subject qualification of the same individual is not unified with the civil litigation subject qualification. This paper studies and analyzes the current situation and historical origin of the limited separatism or disunity between the civil subject and the civil litigation subject adopted in the current law of our country and the relevant international laws. This paper analyzes on the problems existing in the system of the subject of civil action in China, and puts forward the point of view that the civil subject and the subject of civil action should be unified and that the unified civil code should be formulated as soon as possible. As a kind of important civil subject, what kind of influence and what kind of influence should the revocation of business license have on the qualification of civil subject of enterprise legal person and the qualification of civil litigation subject? Combined with the relevant laws and regulations of business license, this paper studies and analyzes its nature and function, and enumerates and analyzes the reasons of business license revocation from five aspects. In addition, the author compares and discusses the two common situations (business license revocation and cancellation) by inductive and deductive methods in judicial practice. It is pointed out that the law should clearly stipulate the criteria for the loss of the civil subject qualification and the business qualification of the enterprise, and the business license shall be the representation of the business qualification of the enterprise as a legal person, and the loss of the business license does not directly cause the enterprise to lose the civil subject qualification. In the fourth part, from the angle of the relationship between the change of the nature of the enterprise legal person before liquidation, liquidation and after liquidation and the determination of the litigation subject, the civil subject qualification of the enterprise legal person is discussed in terms of the determination of the subject of litigation in the liquidation of the creditor's rights and liabilities of the enterprise. This paper analyzes and summarizes the qualification of litigation subject, and puts forward several measures and solutions for the enterprise legal person who has lost his business license to participate in the relevant litigation effectively. At the end of the article, two suggestions are put forward on the related system of revocation of business license in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：燕山大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D925.1;D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李巧毅;;論公司注銷后股東對債權(quán)人的民事責(zé)任[J];廣東工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年02期

2 龔恒超,關(guān)媛媛;反思商事登記法律制度[J];中國工商管理研究;2003年05期

3 邱嘉煜;被吊銷營業(yè)執(zhí)照的公司及其股東的訴訟地位[J];中國工商管理研究;2003年10期

4 毛建國;被吊銷營業(yè)執(zhí)照法人訴訟地位問題的再思考[J];河北法學(xué);2003年05期

5 徐彥冰;吊銷營業(yè)執(zhí)照的法律問題探析[J];河北法學(xué);2004年10期

6 袁輝;淺議公司注銷、被吊銷營業(yè)執(zhí)照和公司清算義務(wù)[J];煤炭企業(yè)管理;2003年11期

7 陳燕;;談吊銷營業(yè)執(zhí)照后企業(yè)主體資格的變遷[J];審計與理財;2008年07期

8 朱曉U，

本文編號：1936745