本文選題：股東大會(huì) + 程序瑕疵��； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：股東大會(huì)是公司的權(quán)力機(jī)構(gòu),是全體股東行使股東權(quán)利,實(shí)現(xiàn)公司治理的地方。然而股東大會(huì)是公司的非常設(shè)機(jī)構(gòu),其僅以會(huì)議形式存在,只有在召開股東大會(huì)會(huì)議時(shí)才作為公司機(jī)關(guān)存在。它的正常運(yùn)行是通過召開定期股東大會(huì)和臨時(shí)股東大會(huì)的形式來實(shí)現(xiàn)。此時(shí)就需要設(shè)計(jì)一系列的程序來保障股東參與公司事務(wù)的管理,通過股東大會(huì)主張權(quán)利,維護(hù)自身的權(quán)益。本文從股東大會(huì)通知程序出發(fā),通過對(duì)一則案例的分析,探討股東大會(huì)通知程序中存在的瑕疵,以及存在這些瑕疵時(shí)將產(chǎn)生何種法律后果的問題。全文分為四個(gè)部分,共計(jì)一萬七千余字,主要框架如下: 第一部分為引言,主要通過對(duì)一則股東大會(huì)決議撤銷糾紛案例的介紹,分析該案件存在的爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn),從而引出本文的研究對(duì)象。即:股東大會(huì)通知程序在何種情況下構(gòu)成瑕疵,以及構(gòu)成瑕疵時(shí)對(duì)股東大會(huì)決議效力的影響。 第二部分,股東大會(huì)通知程序瑕疵構(gòu)成。本部分通過對(duì)一個(gè)合法合章的通知程序的論述,去分析在何種情況下將導(dǎo)致股東大會(huì)通知程序上的瑕疵。通常情況下,當(dāng)股東大會(huì)通知存在違法或者違章情形時(shí),構(gòu)成通知程序上的瑕疵。但是又存在例外情形,如在通知對(duì)象上,有部分股東未被通知是由于其提供的地址錯(cuò)誤等股東自身原因造成時(shí),不應(yīng)該認(rèn)定為存在通知程序上的瑕疵。 第三部分,股東大會(huì)通知程序瑕疵對(duì)股東大會(huì)決議效力的影響。本部分分別從通知期限瑕疵、通知方式瑕疵、通知對(duì)象不齊全以及通知內(nèi)容不完整角度出發(fā),分析通知程序存在這些瑕疵時(shí)股東大會(huì)決議的效力。一般來說,通知程序上的瑕疵都將引起決議被撤銷。但是在部分情況下,如會(huì)議通知人未按照法律和章程規(guī)定的通知方式進(jìn)行通知,但是全體股東均知曉開會(huì)事宜且未提出異議的,此時(shí)通知方式上的瑕疵并不足以影響決議的作出,決議應(yīng)當(dāng)被認(rèn)定為是有效的。 第四部分對(duì)案例進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的解析,并提出了筆者對(duì)處理此類案件的意見和建議。在認(rèn)定通知程序上存在瑕疵決議的效力時(shí),不應(yīng)該刻板地適用公司法,而是應(yīng)該對(duì)案件進(jìn)行綜合考察,平衡各方利益,作出最合理的判斷。
[Abstract]:The general meeting of shareholders is the authority of the company and the place where all shareholders exercise shareholder rights and realize corporate governance. However, the general meeting of shareholders is a non-permanent organization of a company, which only exists in the form of a meeting, and only exists as an organ of the company when a major meeting of shareholders is held. Its normal operation is through the periodic general meeting of shareholders and temporary general meeting of shareholders to achieve. At this point, we need to design a series of procedures to protect shareholders to participate in the management of corporate affairs, through the shareholders' general meeting to claim rights and protect their own rights and interests. Based on the procedure of notice of shareholders' general meeting, this paper discusses the defects in the procedure of notice of shareholders' general meeting by analyzing a case, as well as the legal consequences of these defects. The full text is divided into four parts, a total of more than 17000 words, the main framework is as follows: The first part is the introduction, mainly through the introduction of a shareholder general meeting resolution revocation dispute case, analyzes the dispute focus of the case, and leads to the object of this paper. That is, the circumstances under which the notice procedure of shareholders' general meeting constitutes a defect, and the influence on the validity of the resolution of the shareholders' general meeting when the defect is constituted. The second part, the shareholders' general meeting notice the procedure flaw constitution. In this part, the author discusses a legal notification procedure to analyze the circumstances that will lead to defects in the notice procedure of the general meeting of shareholders. In general, when the notice of shareholders' general meeting is illegal or illegal, it constitutes a flaw in the notice procedure. However, there are exceptions. For example, when some shareholders fail to be notified because of the wrong address provided by them, they should not be regarded as defective in the notification procedure. The third part, the influence of the defect of shareholders' general meeting notice procedure on the validity of shareholders' general meeting resolution. This part analyzes the validity of the resolution of the shareholders' general meeting when the notice procedure exists from the point of view of the defect of the notice period, the defect of the way of notice, the incomplete object of notice and the incomplete content of the notice. Generally speaking, defects in the notification procedure will cause the resolution to be rescinded. But in some cases, if the notifier of the meeting fails to give notice in accordance with the means of notice prescribed by law and articles of association, but all shareholders are aware of the matter of the meeting and have not raised any objection, The defects in the method of notification are not enough to affect the making of the resolution, which should be considered as valid. The fourth part makes a detailed analysis of the case, and puts forward the author's opinions and suggestions on how to deal with such cases. In determining the validity of the defective resolution in the notice procedure, the company law should not be rigidly applied, but the case should be comprehensively investigated, the interests of all parties should be balanced, and the most reasonable judgment should be made.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 錢玉林;;論可撤銷的股東大會(huì)決議[J];法學(xué);2006年11期

2 黃學(xué)武;葛文;;股東會(huì)召集程序瑕疵與撤銷——一則申請(qǐng)撤銷股東會(huì)決議糾紛案評(píng)析[J];法學(xué);2007年09期

3 龍燕;;關(guān)于股東大會(huì)會(huì)議通知制度若干問題研究[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年20期

4 蔣大興;股東會(huì)會(huì)議通知制度分析與缺陷檢討——以《公司法》的修改為中心[J];南京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué).人文科學(xué).社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 江西省鄱陽縣人民法院 邱世平　彭躍進(jìn);[N];人民法院報(bào);2010年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孫加瑞;公司股東權(quán)訴訟研究[D];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2000年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王柏青;股東會(huì)召集制度研究[D];山東大學(xué);2005年

2 王偉;股東大會(huì)召集程序瑕疵法律問題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

3 崔潔;股東會(huì)會(huì)議召集制度研究[D];南京理工大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1899678