發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-13 06:38

  本文選題：公司僵局 + 司法解散��； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 公司的經(jīng)營(yíng)管理主要依靠股東(大)會(huì)、董事會(huì)等機(jī)構(gòu)的運(yùn)行,當(dāng)公司股東或董事之間產(chǎn)生矛盾,上述機(jī)構(gòu)無(wú)法召開會(huì)議或無(wú)法作出有效的決議,公司就陷入僵局,公司僵局對(duì)公司、股東、公司的債權(quán)人等的利益都會(huì)造成嚴(yán)重的危害,而此前對(duì)該類案件法院是不予受理的。我國(guó)《公司法》于2005年修訂后,第183條規(guī)定了股東可以通過(guò)司法途徑解散公司以打破公司僵局,為解決公司僵局問(wèn)題提供了一條司法救濟(jì)途徑,隨后的《公司法》司法解釋(二)對(duì)該制度進(jìn)行了解釋,完善了公司治理機(jī)制,但規(guī)定比較原則性,不易操作,且通過(guò)解散公司來(lái)打破僵局成本太高,并非最優(yōu)的救濟(jì)措施。本文結(jié)合《公司法》第183條及司法解釋,對(duì)公司僵局的概念、原因、危害、司法解散制度以及其他替代救濟(jì)措施等問(wèn)題展開闡述。 本文共分四部分。第一部分介紹公司僵局的概念、特征以及公司僵局的主要分類;第二部分從有限責(zé)任公司的封閉性、資本維持原則以及資本多數(shù)決制度等方面,闡述有限責(zé)任公司產(chǎn)生公司僵局的原因以及公司僵局公司及股東等的利益所造成的損害。第三部分參照美國(guó)、德國(guó)等對(duì)公司僵局采取的措施,并結(jié)合我國(guó)的實(shí)際情況,對(duì)《公司法》第183條規(guī)定的司法解散制度適用的條件、窮盡內(nèi)部救濟(jì)方式和公司主體維持等原則進(jìn)行了探討,對(duì)因公司形成僵局后股東要求司法解散過(guò)程中的造成的不足之處如成本過(guò)高,浪費(fèi)社會(huì)資源、容易引發(fā)機(jī)會(huì)主義訴訟等進(jìn)行闡述,并對(duì)替代性救濟(jì)措施——強(qiáng)制股份收購(gòu)進(jìn)行了理論和實(shí)踐的探討,最后針對(duì)我國(guó)實(shí)踐,提出其他替代性救濟(jì)措施,如公司分立、機(jī)構(gòu)訴訟等措施,以期在發(fā)生公司僵局時(shí),當(dāng)事人能夠根據(jù)實(shí)際情況提出請(qǐng)求,人民法院能夠靈活運(yùn)用上述措施,針對(duì)個(gè)案選擇適合的解決辦法,化解矛盾,以維護(hù)公司、公司股東及債權(quán)人等的合法權(quán)益,維持正常的經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序。第四部分提出公司僵局的預(yù)防措施,如股東事先約定公司章程的內(nèi)容等。
[Abstract]:The operation and management of a company mainly depends on the operation of the shareholders (large), the board of directors and other institutions. When there is a contradiction between the shareholders or the directors of the company, the above institutions cannot hold a meeting or can not make effective resolutions. The company is in a deadlock, and the corporate deadlock will cause serious harm to the interests of the company, the shareholders and the creditors of the company. The court of this kind of case is inadmissible. After the amendment of the company law of China in 2005, the 183rd stipulates that the shareholders can dissolve the company through judicial channels to break the company deadlock and provide a way of judicial relief to solve the problem of corporate deadlock. Then, the company law, judicial interpretation (two) has explained the system and perfected the public. It is not the best remedy to break the deadlock cost by dissolving the company, and it is not the best remedy. This article combines the 183rd articles of the company law and the judicial explanation, and expounds the concept, the cause, the harm of the company deadlock, the judicial dissolution system and the other alternative relief measures.
This article is divided into four parts. The first part introduces the concept and characteristics of the corporate deadlock and the main classification of the company deadlock. The second part expounds the reasons for the company deadlock in the limited liability company and the interests of the company and shareholders from the limited liability company's closeness, the capital maintenance principle and the capital majority system. The third part, referring to the measures taken by the United States and Germany on the corporate deadlock, and combined with the actual conditions of our country, discussed the conditions applicable to the judicial dissolution system of the company law and the 183rd provisions, the exhaustion of the internal relief methods and the maintenance of the company's main body, and the judicial solution to the shareholders' requirements after the company has formed a deadlock. The inadequacies in the process of dispersion, such as high cost, waste of social resources, easy to trigger opportunism litigation, are discussed, and the theory and practice of alternative relief measures, compulsory stock acquisition, are discussed. In the end, other alternative relief measures, such as corporate separation and institutional litigation, are put forward in accordance with the practice of our country. In the event of the deadlock in the company, the parties can make a request according to the actual situation. The people's court can use the above measures flexibly, select the appropriate solutions to the case, dissolve the contradictions, maintain the legitimate rights and interests of the company, the company shareholders and the creditors, and maintain the normal economic order. The fourth part puts forward the prevention of the company deadlock. Measures such as the shareholders' prior agreement on the contents of the articles of association.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 余t，

本文編號(hào)：1882089