本文選題：公司瑕疵設(shè)立 + 設(shè)立效力　； 參考：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來,我國市場經(jīng)濟(jì)飛速發(fā)展,公司逐漸成為最重要的市場主體,是市場秩序中法律關(guān)系的重要承載者。公司在社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)中發(fā)揮重要的作用是以其有效存在為前提的。公司唯有在設(shè)立過程中遵守了法律規(guī)定的條件和程序,方能成為一個(gè)合格的市場主體。隨著我國市場經(jīng)濟(jì)體制的建立和不斷完善,大量的公司得以設(shè)立,但在公司設(shè)立過程中出現(xiàn)了種種瑕疵設(shè)立的情形。瑕疵設(shè)立的公司不利于社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序穩(wěn)定和交易安全,目前我國僅在《公司法》第199條對(duì)此有規(guī)定,但過于模糊籠統(tǒng),極不符合市場經(jīng)濟(jì)的需要。因此,有必要對(duì)公司瑕疵設(shè)立制度的相關(guān)法律問題進(jìn)行深入的研究。 本文首先研究了公司瑕疵設(shè)立制度的理論基礎(chǔ),在探究公司設(shè)立的概念及設(shè)立原則的變遷基礎(chǔ)上引出公司瑕疵設(shè)立的內(nèi)涵與外延,明確了瑕疵設(shè)立公司的外在表現(xiàn)形式。而后對(duì)公司瑕疵設(shè)立制度進(jìn)行理論分析,認(rèn)為瑕疵設(shè)立的公司是否能夠合法有效的存續(xù),不僅需要考量安全與效率的基本價(jià)值追求,還需要權(quán)衡公司維持與對(duì)利益相關(guān)人的保護(hù)。 隨后本文在考察域外公司瑕疵設(shè)立立法例的基礎(chǔ)上,研究了兩大法系各自的公司瑕疵設(shè)立制度基本原則,英美法系采原則承認(rèn)主義,大陸法系采原則否認(rèn)主義,但都有例外情形。此后總結(jié)了兩大法系公司瑕疵設(shè)立制度的價(jià)值比較,歸納出兩大法系對(duì)待瑕疵設(shè)立公司的總體立法趨勢都是維持瑕疵設(shè)立公司的效力。 考察了域外經(jīng)驗(yàn)后,自然而然的就轉(zhuǎn)到分析我國公司瑕疵設(shè)立制度上。本文對(duì)我國公司瑕疵設(shè)立制度進(jìn)行了歸納總結(jié),列舉了《公司法》的相關(guān)法條,以及最高人民法院的相關(guān)司法解釋,并對(duì)《公司法》第199條進(jìn)行了評(píng)析。在此基礎(chǔ)上,指出我國公司瑕疵設(shè)立制度存在四點(diǎn)不足。與國外的相關(guān)立法進(jìn)行參照,如何完善這些不足,進(jìn)而建立符合我國國情的公司瑕疵設(shè)立制度引發(fā)了下文的探討。 在前文分析的基礎(chǔ)上,從價(jià)值目標(biāo)和處理模式兩個(gè)方面,提出域外公司瑕疵設(shè)立制度對(duì)我國的借鑒。我國應(yīng)當(dāng)明確“原則維持、盡量補(bǔ)正、例外否認(rèn)”的原則,構(gòu)建完備的瑕疵設(shè)立公司制度,并為完善我國公司瑕疵設(shè)立制度提出具體構(gòu)想。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the rapid development of China's market economy, the company has gradually become the most important market subject and an important bearer of legal relations in the market order. Companies play an important role in the social economy is based on its effective existence as the premise. The company can become a qualified market subject only if it obeys the conditions and procedures stipulated by law. With the establishment and improvement of the market economy system in China, a large number of companies have been set up, but in the process of the establishment of the company, there have been a variety of defects in the establishment of the situation. The defective company is not conducive to the stability of social economic order and transaction security. At present, our country only has the stipulation in Article 199 of Company Law, but it is too vague and general, which is extremely not in line with the need of market economy. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a deep study on the relevant legal issues of the company's defective establishment system. This paper first studies the theoretical basis of the system of the establishment of company defects, on the basis of probing into the concept of the establishment of the company and the change of the principle of the establishment, leads to the connotation and extension of the establishment of the defects of the company, and clarifies the external manifestation of the company of the defective establishment. Then the theoretical analysis of the system of defective establishment of the company, that whether the defective company can exist legally and effectively, not only need to consider the security and efficiency of the basic value pursuit. There is also a trade-off between corporate maintenance and stakeholder protection. Then, on the basis of investigating the legislation of foreign company defect establishment, this paper studies the basic principles of the two major legal systems, the common law system adopts the principle recognition doctrine, the civil law system adopts the principle denial doctrine, and the common law system adopts the principle recognition doctrine, and the civil law system adopts the principle denial doctrine. But there are exceptions. Then it summarizes the value comparison between the two legal systems, and concludes that the general legislative trend of the two legal systems is to maintain the effectiveness of the defective establishment company. After examining the overseas experience, we naturally turn to analyzing the system of the establishment of our company's defects. This paper summarizes the system of the establishment of company defects in China, enumerates the relevant articles of the Company Law and the judicial interpretation of the Supreme people's Court, and comments on Article 199 of the Company Law. On this basis, it points out that there are four deficiencies in the system of company defect establishment in our country. With reference to the relevant legislation of foreign countries, how to perfect these deficiencies, and then establish the system of company defect establishment in accordance with the national conditions of our country, which leads to the discussion of the following. On the basis of the above analysis, this paper puts forward the reference of the foreign company defect establishment system to our country from two aspects of value goal and treatment mode. Our country should make clear the principle of "maintaining the principle, correcting it as far as possible and denying it with exception", construct a complete system of defective company establishment, and put forward a concrete idea for perfecting the system of the establishment of defect in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 凌祁漫;公司設(shè)立法律制度研究[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1833473