本文選題：外資 + 股權(quán)并購(gòu)　； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：外資在華股權(quán)并購(gòu)實(shí)踐由來已久,但股權(quán)并購(gòu)作為外資并購(gòu)的方式之一,一直沒有得到理論上的足夠認(rèn)識(shí)及立法上的有效規(guī)制。本文在界定股權(quán)并購(gòu)概念的基礎(chǔ)上,從股權(quán)并購(gòu)的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義出發(fā),闡述與股權(quán)并購(gòu)相關(guān)理論問題,在考察股權(quán)并購(gòu)國(guó)內(nèi)立法及實(shí)踐的同時(shí),借鑒美國(guó)相關(guān)立法經(jīng)驗(yàn),對(duì)外資在華股權(quán)并購(gòu)法律制度的完善提出相關(guān)建議。 全文分為引言、正文、結(jié)束語(yǔ),其中正文分為三個(gè)部分: 第一部分是對(duì)外資在華股權(quán)并購(gòu)的概述。在界定外資并購(gòu)概念的基礎(chǔ)上,簡(jiǎn)要介紹了其一般分類,著重分析股權(quán)并購(gòu)與資產(chǎn)并購(gòu)的分類方式,并對(duì)兩者的區(qū)別與聯(lián)系進(jìn)行了比較。然后,對(duì)股權(quán)并購(gòu)的概念及其方式,即購(gòu)買型與增資型進(jìn)行解析。最后,通過對(duì)外資在華股權(quán)并購(gòu)的現(xiàn)狀及發(fā)展趨勢(shì)分析指出,股權(quán)并購(gòu)法律制度的不完備是阻礙我國(guó)外資并購(gòu)發(fā)展的重要原因之一,從而引出下一部分對(duì)股權(quán)并購(gòu)法律制度的現(xiàn)狀分析。 第二部分是對(duì)我國(guó)外資在華股權(quán)并購(gòu)法律制度的現(xiàn)狀分析。在對(duì)我國(guó)外資在華股權(quán)并購(gòu)的立法體系的解讀和分析基礎(chǔ)上,借鑒公私法分類,重點(diǎn)圍繞股權(quán)并購(gòu)反壟斷審查制度和相關(guān)權(quán)益人保護(hù)制度的法律規(guī)定,對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)行股權(quán)并購(gòu)法律制度進(jìn)行深入解析。 第三部分是我國(guó)外資在華股權(quán)并購(gòu)法律制度不足及完善。公法層面上,在《并購(gòu)規(guī)定》體系下,對(duì)于股權(quán)并購(gòu)的規(guī)定存在著諸多法律沖突�！斗磯艛喾ā冯m確立了并購(gòu)審查制度,但其不僅缺少股權(quán)并購(gòu)的專門規(guī)定,且在審查機(jī)構(gòu)、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和程序方面都有缺陷。私法層面上,《公司法》對(duì)股權(quán)并購(gòu)沒有明確的規(guī)定,且在股東權(quán)益和債權(quán)人權(quán)益保護(hù)制度方面存在明顯缺陷。《合同法》在債權(quán)人權(quán)益保護(hù)制度方面需要進(jìn)一步完善。針對(duì)股權(quán)并購(gòu)的特點(diǎn),指出應(yīng)從公法和私法兩個(gè)層面對(duì)股權(quán)并購(gòu)進(jìn)行相應(yīng)的完善。 在結(jié)語(yǔ)中,筆者指出:股權(quán)并購(gòu)的“公法為主,私法為輔”的雙重性質(zhì)決定其需要公法和私法共同調(diào)整,認(rèn)為建立一套以《公司法》、《外資并購(gòu)法》和《反壟斷法》為基本框架的法律體系對(duì)外資并購(gòu)的共性問題予以規(guī)范,同時(shí)在該體系中設(shè)專章對(duì)外資在華股權(quán)并購(gòu)的特殊問題予以規(guī)范,是比較合理的選擇。
[Abstract]:The practice of foreign equity M & A in China has a long history, but as one of the ways of foreign capital M & A, equity M & A has not been recognized enough in theory and effectively regulated in legislation. On the basis of defining the concept of equity merger and acquisition, starting from the practical significance of equity merger and acquisition, this paper expounds the theoretical issues related to equity mergers and acquisitions, and at the same time, it examines the domestic legislation and practice of equity mergers and acquisitions, and draws lessons from the relevant legislative experience of the United States. To improve the legal system of foreign equity mergers and acquisitions in China, put forward relevant suggestions. The full text is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which the text is divided into three parts: The first part is an overview of foreign equity mergers and acquisitions in China. On the basis of defining the concept of foreign capital M & A, this paper briefly introduces its general classification, emphatically analyzes the classification methods of equity M & A and asset M & A, and compares the differences and relations between the two. Then, the paper analyzes the concept and ways of equity M & A, that is, purchase type and capital increase type. Finally, through the analysis of the current situation and development trend of foreign equity M & A in China, it is pointed out that the imperfection of legal system of equity merger and acquisition is one of the important reasons that hinder the development of foreign capital M & A in China. Thus leads to the next part of the legal system of equity mergers and acquisitions analysis of the status quo. The second part is the analysis of the legal system of foreign equity mergers and acquisitions in China. On the basis of the interpretation and analysis of the legislative system of foreign equity mergers and acquisitions in China, the author draws lessons from the classification of public and private laws, and focuses on the legal provisions of the anti-monopoly review system and the related rights and interests protection system of equity mergers and acquisitions. Deeply analyze the current legal system of equity merger and acquisition in China. The third part is that the legal system of foreign capital M & A in China is inadequate and perfect. On the level of public law, there are many conflicts of laws on the regulation of equity merger and acquisition under the system of "M & A". Although the Anti-monopoly Law establishes the system of merger and acquisition review, it not only lacks the special regulation of equity M & A, but also exists in the examining body. Both standards and procedures are flawed. On the level of private law, the Company Law has no clear provisions on equity merger and acquisition, and there are obvious defects in the system of protecting shareholders' rights and interests and creditors' rights and interests, and the system of protection of creditors' rights and interests in < contract Law] needs to be further improved. According to the characteristics of equity mergers and acquisitions, the author points out that equity mergers and acquisitions should be perfected from the two aspects of public law and private law. In the conclusion, the author points out that the dual nature of "public law is dominant, private law is secondary" determines the need for public law and private law to be adjusted together. It is considered that the common problems of foreign capital M & A should be standardized by establishing a set of legal systems with the basic framework of Company Law, Foreign Capital M & A Law and Anti-monopoly Law. At the same time, it is a reasonable choice to set up a special chapter in this system to standardize the special problems of foreign equity mergers and acquisitions in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.29

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 熊亮;舒保華;;外資并購(gòu)的概念及發(fā)展簡(jiǎn)史[J];全國(guó)商情(經(jīng)濟(jì)理論研究);2008年07期

2 張曉君;;國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)安全與法的關(guān)系探析[J];求索;2007年09期

3 王中美;;論反壟斷法對(duì)經(jīng)營(yíng)者集中的規(guī)制[J];行政與法;2008年06期

4 王霞;祁向前;;金融危機(jī)背景下我國(guó)外資并購(gòu)中存在的問題及建議[J];中央財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 顏湘蓉;;公司并購(gòu)協(xié)議法律效力認(rèn)定問題的比較研究——以目標(biāo)公司董事受信義務(wù)履行為視角[A];2006年中國(guó)青年國(guó)際法學(xué)者暨博士生論壇論文集（國(guó)際公法卷）[C];2006年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 中國(guó)人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院 吳長(zhǎng)軍;[N];國(guó)際商報(bào);2009年

2 劉以賓;[N];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)報(bào);2008年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 薄守省;債務(wù)欺詐研究[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2003年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王海東;企業(yè)并購(gòu)法律制度分析[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年

2 楊杰媚;異議股東股份回購(gòu)請(qǐng)求權(quán)制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1783844