本文選題：有限責任公司 + 股東困境�。� 參考：《華東政法大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：德國在1892年創(chuàng)造了有限責任公司制度,該制度被稱為是“立法者的發(fā)明”。有限責任公司同時具備了資合性和人合性的特點,同時公司規(guī)模比較小,股東往往兼任著管理者,公司的管理成本低、效率比較高,實踐中中小企業(yè)往往采取有限責任公司的組織形式。但是同樣是因為其兼具資合性和人合性,二者之間的矛盾及固有的閉鎖性往往使得有限責任公司的中小股東陷入“股東困境”,這是有限責任公司所特有的問題,也是實踐中經(jīng)常出現(xiàn)的狀況。但是我國的公司法重點監(jiān)管的公司組織形式是股份有限公司,給予了有限責任公司極大的自治的權(quán)利,長期以來都漠視有限責任公司的治理問題。 我國在2005年出臺了新《公司法》,其后又頒布了三個司法解釋,對有限責任公司的股東困境問題提供了法律救濟,但是卻不夠完善,或者是規(guī)定過為粗糙,不具有可操作性,或者是根本沒有相關(guān)的規(guī)定。在此情況下,本文運用比較法、案例分析法對有限責任公司的股東困境問題的法律救濟進行分析,確定相應(yīng)的程序,并借鑒國外的立法經(jīng)驗完善實體法方面的規(guī)定。 本文首先是導言部分,通過股東糾紛的案件引出股東困境及法律救濟的相關(guān)問題。正文具體分成六章: 第一章概述有限責任公司的股東困境問題。這一章分為四節(jié),第一節(jié)講述股東困境的概念和表現(xiàn)形式;第二節(jié)講述股東困境的成因,即法理上的成因及現(xiàn)實中的成因;第三節(jié)講述對股東困境進行法律救濟的必要性;第四節(jié)論述股東困境法律救濟的法理基礎(chǔ)。 第二章講述各國對股東困境的救濟制度,總結(jié)各國股東困境救濟的共性和特點。 第三章講述的是我國股東困境的立法現(xiàn)狀,并對相關(guān)的制度進行簡要的解析。 第四章重點講述股東困境的法律救濟制度其中的一種,即異議股東股份回購請求權(quán),詳述其立法現(xiàn)狀、訴訟程序及如何完善相關(guān)的制度。 第五章重點講述股東困境的另一種法律救濟途徑——股東請求解散公司之訴,詳述其立法現(xiàn)狀、訴訟程序,及如何完善相應(yīng)的制度。 第六章,講述的是除了上述兩種制度以外的其他救濟方式,包括司法方面的救濟及司法之外的救濟,即章程預(yù)訂和仲裁制度。
[Abstract]:Germany created the limited-liability company system in 1892, which was called a "legislator's invention."Limited liability companies have the characteristics of both capital and people. At the same time, the size of the company is relatively small, the shareholders are often also managers, the management cost of the company is low, and the efficiency is relatively high.In practice, small and medium-sized enterprises often take the form of limited liability companies.However, it is also because of the combination of capital and person, the contradiction between the two and the inherent closeness often make the minority shareholders of the limited liability company fall into the "shareholder dilemma", which is the unique problem of the limited liability company.Also is the situation which often appears in practice.However, the company organization form of the key supervision of company law in our country is the joint stock limited company, which has given the limited liability company the great autonomy right, and has ignored the limited liability company's governance problem for a long time.In 2005, our country issued the new Company Law, and then issued three judicial explanations, which provided legal relief to the shareholders' plight of limited liability company, but it was not perfect, or had been stipulated as rough and not operable.Or there are no rules at all.In this case, this paper uses comparative law and case analysis method to analyze the legal relief of shareholders' plight of limited liability company, to determine the corresponding procedure, and to use foreign legislative experience to perfect the provisions of substantive law.The first part of this paper is the introduction, which leads to the shareholder dilemma and the related problems of legal remedy through shareholder dispute cases.The text is divided into six chapters:The first chapter summarizes the shareholder dilemma of limited liability company.This chapter is divided into four sections, the first is about the concept and manifestation of shareholders' plight, the second is about the causes of shareholders' plight, the third is about the necessity of legal remedy to shareholders' plight.The fourth section discusses the legal basis of legal relief for shareholders'plight.The second chapter describes the relief system of shareholders' plight, summarizes the commonness and characteristics of shareholders' plight relief.The third chapter is about the current legislation of shareholder dilemma in China, and briefly analyzes the relevant system.The fourth chapter focuses on one of the legal relief systems for shareholders' plight, that is, the right to ask for share repurchase by dissenting shareholders, including the current legislative situation, litigation procedures and how to improve the relevant system.The fifth chapter focuses on another way of legal relief for shareholders' plight-shareholders' petition for dissolution of the company, detailed legislative status, litigation procedures, and how to improve the corresponding system.The sixth chapter deals with other remedies in addition to the above two systems, including judicial relief and judicial relief, that is, the constitution reservation and arbitration system.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃美園,周彥;我國公司僵局司法救濟制度之構(gòu)建[J];法律適用;2004年05期

2 鮑為民;美國法上的公司僵局處理制度及其啟示[J];法商研究;2005年03期

3 李泫永,官欣榮;公司僵局與司法救濟[J];法學;2004年04期

4 范黎紅;;有限責任公司司法裁判解散的困惑及法理思考[J];法學;2007年04期

5 郭文婧;;我國新公司法中的公司僵局處理制度評析[J];廣西政法管理干部學院學報;2006年02期

6 羅培新;;新《公司法》框架下的司法裁判困境[J];華東政法學院學報;2006年01期

7 周海博;;我國有限責任公司異議股東股份回購法律制度重構(gòu)[J];遼寧大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2009年05期

8 石曉莉;王旭剛;;論公司司法解散制度的完善[J];四川師范大學學報(社會科學版);2007年03期

9 張愛菊;;論有限責任公司異議股東股份回購請求權(quán)[J];河南省政法管理干部學院學報;2011年01期

10 李曙光;;新《公司法》中破解“公司僵局”制度安排的探討[J];武漢理工大學學報(社會科學版);2006年03期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條

1 中國政法大學教授、博士生導師 趙旭東;[N];人民法院報;2002年

2 林曉鎳;[N];人民法院報;2002年

，

本文編號：1736162