本文選題：瑕疵出資　切入點(diǎn)：股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓　出處：《江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】：有限責(zé)任公司瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓問題是理論界和實(shí)務(wù)中的熱點(diǎn)和難點(diǎn)問題。在我國,股東瑕疵出資的情形屢見不鮮,表現(xiàn)為虛假出資和抽逃出資,股權(quán)存在瑕疵不僅會(huì)影響股東在公司各項(xiàng)權(quán)利的行使,而且將會(huì)對公司、其他足額出資的股東以及公司債權(quán)人的利益產(chǎn)生不利的影響。我國新修訂的《公司法》對瑕疵股權(quán)的相關(guān)規(guī)定明顯不足,瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同的效力以及轉(zhuǎn)讓后當(dāng)事人的責(zé)任承擔(dān)問題眾說紛紜。本文從公司實(shí)踐出發(fā),緊密結(jié)合《公司法》、《合同法》等法規(guī),借鑒其他國家與地區(qū)的立法與學(xué)說,試圖在我國的法律體系之中進(jìn)一步完善有限責(zé)任公司瑕疵出資股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓制度。 本文的基本結(jié)構(gòu)如下： 第一章首先從公司資本制度出發(fā),分析了公司三大資本制度與股東出資的意義,并分類列舉了瑕疵出資的表現(xiàn)形式(虛假出資和抽逃出資)。其次對取得股東資格標(biāo)準(zhǔn)(形式要件與實(shí)質(zhì)要件)的界定來論述瑕疵出資人能否取得股東資格,然后闡述了瑕疵出資的股東權(quán)利要受一定的限制。 第二章首先分析了股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同的成立與生效要遵守合同法的規(guī)定,還要遵守公司法的規(guī)定；其次瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同除了具有一般股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同的特征外,還具有意思表示復(fù)雜,更大的法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)等；最后分析瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同的性質(zhì),在對內(nèi)轉(zhuǎn)讓情形下,應(yīng)該采用意思主義即合同生效即為股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓時(shí)間；在公司對外轉(zhuǎn)讓情形下,應(yīng)該采用債權(quán)形式主義。 第三章首先對理論界存在的瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同效力的各種學(xué)術(shù)觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)；其次股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓是股東的固有權(quán)利,從維護(hù)交易秩序和平衡公司法上各參與人利益的角度出發(fā),認(rèn)定瑕疵出資股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同有效更符合公司法的特征。 第四章以責(zé)任對象為標(biāo)準(zhǔn),分別討論了瑕疵出資股東對已足額出資股東、公司、公司債權(quán)人的民事責(zé)任。首先,在對受讓人是否承擔(dān)責(zé)任的各種學(xué)術(shù)觀點(diǎn)評(píng)價(jià)基礎(chǔ)上,提出受讓人應(yīng)承擔(dān)連帶責(zé)任；其次瑕疵出資股東依照公司法、公司章程和發(fā)起人協(xié)議的規(guī)定,對其他足額出資股東承擔(dān)違約責(zé)任。再次,瑕疵出資股東依照公司法的規(guī)定,對公司承擔(dān)以資本充實(shí)責(zé)任為主體的特殊民事責(zé)任。最后,探討了瑕疵出資股東對公司債權(quán)人承擔(dān)責(zé)任的基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:The problem of limited liability company of defective equity transfer is a hot and difficult problem in theory and practice. In China, the situation of the defective capital contribution of shareholders is It is often seen., fraudulent investment and capital flight, equity flaws will not only affect the rights of the shareholders in the company, and will have a negative impact on the company, the other in full the shareholder and the company's creditors. The relevant provisions of defective equity < Company Law > China revised is obviously insufficient, validity of the defective equity transfer contract and the liability of the parties after the transfer problem. This paper from the company Public opinions are divergent. practice, combined with < Company Law > >, < contract law and other laws and regulations. From the legislation and theory of other countries and regions, to further improve the legal system of limited liability company flaws in China's capital equity transfer system.
The basic structure of this article is as follows:
The first chapter from the analysis of the capital system of the company, the company's three capital system and shareholder's significance, and lists the forms of defective capital contribution (fraudulent investment and capital flight). Secondly to obtain the shareholder qualification standard (formal elements and substantive elements) to discuss the definition of defective investors can obtain the shareholder qualification then, describes the defective capital contribution of shareholder rights should be subject to certain restrictions.
The second chapter first analyzes the provisions of the establishment of the equity transfer contract and the effect to comply with the contract law, but also abide by the regulations in company law; secondly, the defective equity transfer contract besides has the general characteristics of the equity transfer contract, also has the meaning of complex, greater legal risk; finally, analysis of the nature of the defective equity transfer contract, in in the transfer case, namely the contract should adopt the meaning of Marxist is the transfer of shares in the company; external transfer case, should adopt the credit formalism.
To evaluate the various academic views the third chapter on the theory of the defective equity transfer contract; secondly, the equity transfer is the inherent right of shareholders, in order to maintain the transaction order and the balance of the company law of the interests that the equity transfer contract of defective features effectively and in accordance with the company law.
The fourth chapter takes responsibility object as the standard, the company has defective capital contribution shareholders to shareholders, are discussed, the civil liability of the creditors of the company. First of all, whether in the responsibility for the transferee of the academic point of view based on the evaluation, put forward the transferee shall bear joint liability; secondly, the defective capital contribution of shareholders in accordance with the company law and the articles of association of the company. The provisions of the sponsor agreement, the other shareholders bear the liability for breach of contract. Thirdly, the defective capital contribution of shareholders in accordance with the provisions of the company law, the company undertakes the special civil liability to capital adequacy responsibility as the main body. Finally, the foundation of the defective capital contribution of shareholders liable to the creditors of the company.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 邢丹丹;瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的效力[D];鄭州大學(xué);2013年

2 李悅溪;有限責(zé)任公司股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓制度若干問題研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2013年

3 蘇展;有限責(zé)任公司股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓制度若干問題研究[D];吉林財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1708056