本文選題：司法解散　切入點：公司僵局　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著社會主義市場經(jīng)濟的建立和不斷完善,特別是在1999年修訂了《中華人民共和國公司法》(以下簡稱《公司法》)以來,成千上萬的公司,特別是中小型公司,如雨后春筍般蓬勃發(fā)展起來。但是,在這些公司生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營過程中,往往由于公司股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)、控制權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)乃至股東會或董事會表決程序設(shè)計等方面的缺陷,以及在公司存續(xù)過程中產(chǎn)生的股東或董事之間的分歧、糾紛等人為因素的干擾,常常導(dǎo)致公司陷入經(jīng)營管理的僵局。在此情況下,在公司既無法啟動自愿解散程序,又不具備破產(chǎn)條件的情況下,就會給公司乃至股東造成不必要的巨大財產(chǎn)損失,甚至可能出現(xiàn)故意借公司僵局之際逃避債務(wù),損害債權(quán)人利益的情形出現(xiàn),嚴(yán)重擾亂社會正常交易秩序和市場穩(wěn)定。 為此,我國2005年修訂的《公司法》第183條第一次以法律的形式正式確立了公司司法解散制度。但是,與西方長達150余年的公司司法解散制度相比較,我國立法及司法實踐對此制度的理解和適用尚處于起步階段,在司法實踐中還會遇到種種問題。因此,對其進一步研究有著重要的理論和實踐意義。 本文在我國公司司法解散既有法律規(guī)定的基礎(chǔ)上,探討司法解散公司訴訟相關(guān)基本法律問題,主要從以下四個方面進行研究: 第一章:公司司法解散訴訟的一般理論問題。對公司司法解散訴訟的本質(zhì)和功能進行論述,探討公司司法解散訴訟的內(nèi)涵及法律屬性,并明確其作為國家公權(quán)力介入公司自治的一種形式,應(yīng)當(dāng)以公司自治的界限作為司法干預(yù)的正當(dāng)性基礎(chǔ)。 第二章:公司司法解散訴訟的適用。對公司司法解散訴訟的適用情形和適用前提等方面進行論述,并對具體適用情形作類型化研究,不僅包括公司僵局,還以兜底性條款擴大至股東壓迫等情形。同時,簡要分析了法院在實務(wù)審查具體事由時的相關(guān)困境。 第三章:公司司法解散訴訟的主體。從公司司法解散訴訟的原告、被告資格認定,以及其他股東的訴訟地位入手,對該訴訟涉及的當(dāng)事人范圍進行探討。 第四章:公司司法解散的訴訟判決的效力。從判決效力的法律屬性、主體范圍等方面對判決效力的內(nèi)涵展開探討,并從解散登記的構(gòu)建和清算程序的啟動等方面對判決效力的實現(xiàn)作進一步研究。
[Abstract]:With the establishment and continuous improvement of the socialist market economy, especially since the revision of the Company Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "Company Law") in 1999, thousands of companies, especially small and medium-sized companies, However, in the production and operation of these companies, often due to the company's ownership structure, control structure and even the shareholders' meeting or board of directors voting program design and other shortcomings, As well as the differences between shareholders or directors arising in the course of the company's existence, the interference of human factors such as disputes, etc., which often leads to a deadlock in the management of the company. In this case, the company can neither initiate a voluntary dissolution procedure, If they do not have the conditions for bankruptcy, they will cause unnecessary huge property losses to the company and even shareholders, and may even intentionally evade debts while the company is deadlocked, thereby harming the interests of the creditors. Seriously disturb the social normal trading order and market stability. Therefore, in 2005, Article 183 of Company Law amended in China formally established the system of judicial dissolution of companies by way of law for the first time, but compared with the judicial dissolution system of companies in the West for more than 150 years. The understanding and application of this system in legislation and judicial practice in our country is still in its infancy, and there will be many problems in judicial practice. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to further study it. Based on the existing legal provisions of judicial dissolution of companies in China, this paper discusses the basic legal issues related to judicial dissolution of companies, mainly from the following four aspects:. Chapter one: the general theoretical problems of the judicial dissolution of company. The essence and function of the judicial dissolution of the company are discussed, and the connotation and legal attributes of the judicial dissolution of the company are discussed. It is clear that as a form of state power to intervene in corporate autonomy, the limits of corporate autonomy should be taken as the legitimate basis of judicial intervention. The second chapter: the application of the judicial dissolution of the company. The application of the judicial dissolution of the company and the premise of the application are discussed, and the specific application of the study, not only including the deadlock of the company. At the same time, the paper briefly analyzes the court's predicament when examining the concrete matter in practice. Chapter three: the main body of the judicial dissolution of the company. From the plaintiff, the qualification of the defendant and the litigation status of the other shareholders, the scope of the litigant involved in the lawsuit is discussed. Chapter 4th: the effectiveness of judicial dissolution of the company litigation judgment. From the legal attributes of the validity of the judgment, the scope of the main body and other aspects to explore the connotation of the effectiveness of the judgment, Furthermore, the realization of the validity of the judgment is further studied from the aspects of the establishment of dissolution registration and the initiation of liquidation procedure.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 肖建華;論判決效力主觀范圍的擴張[J];比較法研究;2002年01期

2 張民安;公司瑕疵設(shè)立效力研究[J];比較法研究;2004年04期

3 劉敏;;關(guān)于股東請求解散公司之訴若干問題的思考[J];法律適用;2006年10期

4 鮑為民;美國法上的公司僵局處理制度及其啟示[J];法商研究;2005年03期

5 范黎紅;;有限責(zé)任公司司法裁判解散的困惑及法理思考[J];法學(xué);2007年04期

6 張永欽;論公司解散后清算人不能選任時的法律救濟[J];江西財經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2005年03期

7 羅培新;公司法的合同路徑與公司法規(guī)則的正當(dāng)性[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年02期

8 龔鵬程;;論公司司法解散——對修訂后公司法相關(guān)內(nèi)容的思考[J];南京社會科學(xué);2006年05期

9 李曙光;;新《公司法》中破解“公司僵局”制度安排的探討[J];武漢理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2006年03期

10 吳雁娜;;論公司僵局的司法救濟——對新公司法第183條相關(guān)內(nèi)容的思考[J];新學(xué)術(shù);2007年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 金海平;公司司法解散制度研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 蔡東松;公司僵局法律問題研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號：1641396