本文選題：有限責(zé)任公司　切入點：股東退股　出處：《中國政法大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 有限責(zé)任公司作為一種兼具“資合性”與“人合性”的公司形式,相對于股份有限公司而言,股東人數(shù)較少,其相互間需要一定程度的了解和信任,且不存在公開的股權(quán)交易場所進行自由買賣,因而股東退出公司的途徑受到了很大程度的局限。然而,在有限責(zé)任公司中,中小股東受到大股東欺壓、排擠或其他形式侵害其合法利益的現(xiàn)象時有發(fā)生。因此,為了救濟“資本多數(shù)決”和公司形式的封閉性對股東造成的損害,為有限責(zé)任公司股東提供一種更為便捷的救濟途徑,對退股制度進行深入研究具有很強的現(xiàn)實意義。目前,大陸法系和英美法系許多國家的立法和司法實踐都對股東退股制度有所涉及,我國2005年的《公司法》也在一定程度上對其有所反映,但與紛繁復(fù)雜的公司實踐相比,其中有關(guān)股東退股的規(guī)定仍存在許多不足之處,一定程度上缺乏具體操作性。因而,本文主要從退股制度的特征、理論基礎(chǔ)、價值等方面入手,通過對國內(nèi)外立法和司法實踐的比較分析,探討完善我國有限責(zé)任公司股東退股制度的方法和途徑,以期能更好地發(fā)揮該制度在公司運行實踐中的重要作用,并引發(fā)更多人對該問題的思考和關(guān)注。 從總體上看,本文主要由以下五部分構(gòu)成: 第一部分,引言。從案例入手簡述有限責(zé)任公司股東退股問題研究的原因和現(xiàn)實意義。 第二部分,股東退股制度的基礎(chǔ)性分析。主要從退股制度的概念、特征、價值、理論基礎(chǔ)等幾個方面作簡要介紹。首先,通過與其他概念的比較對退股的定義進行明確界定;其次,對股東退股存在的理論和制度上的爭議從正反兩方面進行概括,并進一步作出相關(guān)評價。第三,簡述有限責(zé)任公司股東退股的必要性和重要價值。第四,對退股制度的理論基礎(chǔ)進行簡要介紹,為有限責(zé)任公司股東退股制度的確立和發(fā)展提供理論支持。 第三部分,國內(nèi)外相關(guān)規(guī)定的比較分析。列舉國外有關(guān)國家在股東退股方面的相關(guān)規(guī)定,并主要通過對德國的退股權(quán)制度和美國的股份收買制度與我國目前的規(guī)定進行對比分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)我國的不足之處,并從中汲取有益的經(jīng)驗予以借鑒。 第四部分,我國有限責(zé)任公司股東退股制度的完善建議。在目前我國《公司法》規(guī)定的基礎(chǔ)上,從退股范圍、退股程序、債權(quán)人保護等幾個方面入手,提出完善我國有限責(zé)任公司股東退股制度的建議,力求在努力平衡各方主體利益的前提下,使退股制度在我國公司運行實踐中發(fā)揮更大的作用。 第五部分,結(jié)論。全面總結(jié)文章的主要內(nèi)容和觀點,在強調(diào)股東退股重要功能的基礎(chǔ)上,進一步明確我國有限責(zé)任公司股東退股制度的完善措施。
[Abstract]:Limited liability company, as a kind of company with both "capital and human nature", has a relatively small number of shareholders, and needs a certain degree of mutual understanding and trust. Moreover, there is no open stock exchange for free trading, so the way for shareholders to withdraw from the company is limited to a great extent. However, in a limited liability company, minority shareholders are oppressed by large shareholders. Exclusion or other forms of encroachment on their legitimate interests occur from time to time. Therefore, in order to remedy the damage caused to shareholders by "capital majority decisions" and the closeness of corporate forms, it provides a more convenient remedy for shareholders of limited liability companies. At present, the legislation and judicial practice of many countries in civil law system and common law system are involved in the shareholder withdrawal system. In 2005, the Company Law of our country also reflected it to some extent, but compared with the complicated company practice, there are still many inadequacies in the regulation of shareholder withdrawal, and to some extent lack of concrete operation. This article mainly starts with the characteristics, theoretical basis and value of the stock withdrawal system, through the comparative analysis of legislation and judicial practice at home and abroad, discusses the ways and means to perfect the shareholder withdrawal system of limited liability companies in our country. It is hoped that the system can play an important role in the operation of the company and cause more people to think and pay attention to the problem. On the whole, this paper consists of the following five parts:. The first part is the introduction. The reasons and practical significance of the research on shareholder withdrawal from limited liability company are briefly introduced from the case. The second part, the basic analysis of shareholder withdrawal system, mainly from the concept, characteristics, value, theoretical basis and other aspects of the system to make a brief introduction. First, by comparing with other concepts of the definition of withdrawal of shares to make a clear definition; Secondly, it generalizes the theory and system controversy of shareholder withdrawal from both positive and negative aspects, and makes further evaluation. Thirdly, the necessity and important value of shareholder withdrawal in limited liability company are briefly described. 4th, This paper briefly introduces the theoretical basis of the withdrawal system and provides theoretical support for the establishment and development of the shareholder withdrawal system of limited liability companies. The third part, the comparative analysis of the relevant provisions at home and abroad. Through the comparative analysis of the German stock withdrawal system and the American stock purchase system and the present regulations of our country, the author finds out the shortcomings of our country, and draws useful experience from them. Part 4th, suggestions for perfecting the shareholder withdrawal system of limited liability companies in China. On the basis of the current provisions of the Company Law of our country, starting with the scope of withdrawal of shares, the procedure of withdrawing shares, the protection of creditors, and so on, This paper puts forward the suggestion of perfecting the shareholder withdrawal system of our limited liability company, and tries to make the withdrawal system play a greater role in the operation practice of our company under the premise of balancing the main interests of all parties. Part 5th, conclusion. The main contents and viewpoints of the article are summarized in an all-round way. On the basis of emphasizing the important function of shareholder withdrawal, the author further clarifies the perfect measures of shareholder withdrawal system in China's limited liability company.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 季童晶;有限責(zé)任公司受壓制股東權(quán)利救濟研究[D];揚州大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：1632189