本文選題：非破產(chǎn)清算　切入點(diǎn)：清算責(zé)任人　出處：《華東政法學(xué)院》2005年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：健康有序的市場(chǎng)環(huán)境中,公司面對(duì)市場(chǎng)應(yīng)該是能進(jìn)能退的�，F(xiàn)行有關(guān)公司法律對(duì)公司準(zhǔn)入機(jī)制研究的比較多,但對(duì)于公司退出市場(chǎng)的有關(guān)制度卻研究相對(duì)較少。我國(guó)現(xiàn)行與公司解散有關(guān)的法律基本以破產(chǎn)法律為主,但是破產(chǎn)解散并不是我國(guó)公司解散的唯一原因。公司經(jīng)營(yíng)期屆滿、公司陷入僵局、股東決定關(guān)閉公司、公司被責(zé)令關(guān)閉、公司被吊銷營(yíng)業(yè)執(zhí)照等等原因都可能導(dǎo)致公司解散并退出市場(chǎng)。這個(gè)環(huán)節(jié)涉及公司股東、債權(quán)人、公司員工等各方利益,需要有法律進(jìn)行規(guī)制,但就目前的立法狀況而言還是明顯不夠的。 在本文第一章中,筆者由清算概念入手,介紹了公司非破產(chǎn)清算的基本概念、導(dǎo)致公司非破產(chǎn)清算的原因、非破產(chǎn)清算制度的價(jià)值意義;又分析了目前我國(guó)關(guān)于公司非破產(chǎn)清算的法律制度,指出法律規(guī)定中存在的部分概念不清、責(zé)任不明等問(wèn)題都導(dǎo)致了操作當(dāng)中的混亂。 第二章是關(guān)于公司非破產(chǎn)清算的清算責(zé)任人的探討,筆者分析了清算責(zé)任人的概念及其與清算人、清算活動(dòng)主體等概念的差異。認(rèn)為有限責(zé)任公司的清算責(zé)任人是全體股東;股份有限公司的清算責(zé)任人是在公司董事會(huì)、監(jiān)事會(huì)及高管人員中派有代表的股東。另外要求清算責(zé)任人承擔(dān)責(zé)任的主體,不應(yīng)局限于目前的債權(quán)人,在一定情況下,公司股東、公司員工等相關(guān)利害關(guān)系人也可以向法院提起訴訟,要求清算責(zé)任人承擔(dān)清算責(zé)任。如果因?yàn)榍逅阖?zé)任人的過(guò)錯(cuò)導(dǎo)致債權(quán)人等利害關(guān)系人利益受損的,清算責(zé)任人應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)侵權(quán)賠償責(zé)任。 第三章中,筆者分析了公司非破產(chǎn)清算的清算人的有關(guān)問(wèn)題。指出應(yīng)當(dāng)統(tǒng)一
[Abstract]:In a healthy and orderly market environment, companies should be able to advance and retreat in the face of the market. However, there are relatively few studies on the relevant system of company withdrawal from the market. The current laws relating to the dissolution of companies in China are basically based on the bankruptcy law, but bankruptcy dissolution is not the only reason for the dissolution of companies in our country. The company has reached an impasse, the shareholders have decided to close the company, the company has been ordered to close down, the company has been revoked its business license, and other reasons may lead to the dissolution of the company and its withdrawal from the market. This link involves the interests of the shareholders, creditors, employees, and other parties of the company. There is a need for legal regulation, but the current legislative situation is clearly inadequate. In the first chapter, the author starts with the concept of liquidation, introduces the basic concept of non-bankruptcy liquidation of the company, causes the non-bankruptcy liquidation of the company, and the value significance of the non-bankruptcy liquidation system; It also analyzes the current legal system of non-bankruptcy liquidation in our country, and points out that some problems in the legal provisions, such as unclear concepts and unclear responsibilities, have led to confusion in the operation. The second chapter is about the company non-bankruptcy liquidation of the person responsible for liquidation, the author analyzes the concept of the person responsible for liquidation and the liquidation of the main body of the concept of differences. The person responsible for liquidation of a company limited by shares is the shareholder who is represented on the board of directors, the board of supervisors and the senior executives of the company. In addition, the main body that requires the person responsible for liquidation to bear responsibility should not be limited to the current creditors, and under certain circumstances, The shareholders, employees, and other relevant interested parties of the company may also file a lawsuit with the court to demand that the person responsible for liquidation be liable for liquidation. If the interests of the creditors or other interested parties are damaged because of the fault of the person responsible for liquidation, The person responsible for liquidation shall bear the liability for tort compensation. In the third chapter, the author analyzes the relevant problems of the liquidator of the company, and points out that it should be unified.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2005
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 王小婷;;我國(guó)防范惡意不清算行為的立法建議[J];經(jīng)營(yíng)管理者;2009年22期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 孫溪;公司清算義務(wù)人法律問(wèn)題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

2 趙建良;論公司解散及相關(guān)制度的完善[D];山東大學(xué);2007年

3 唐瑜;論公司非司法性清算制度的完善[D];貴州大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1593749