本文選題：瑕疵出資　切入點(diǎn)：股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓　出處：《大連海事大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：實(shí)現(xiàn)股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的前提是股東通過(guò)向目標(biāo)公司出資的方式而獲得股權(quán)。2006年施行的新《公司法》允許股東分期繳納出資,并且鼓勵(lì)非貨幣出資的多樣性,這有利于促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)的健康發(fā)展,但是我國(guó)目前整個(gè)社會(huì)的誠(chéng)信體系建設(shè)相對(duì)滯后,這在客觀(guān)上加劇了股東出資瑕疵的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。瑕疵出資導(dǎo)致瑕疵股權(quán)的存在,瑕疵股權(quán)在轉(zhuǎn)讓的過(guò)程中發(fā)生的問(wèn)題層出不窮,這一現(xiàn)象嚴(yán)重沖擊著我國(guó)社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的穩(wěn)定與和諧。 《最高人民法院關(guān)于適用中華人民共和國(guó)公司法若干問(wèn)題的規(guī)定(三)》[’]的出臺(tái)填補(bǔ)了以往我國(guó)商事法律和司法解釋對(duì)于瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓問(wèn)題規(guī)定上的一些空白,但是對(duì)于瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同的效力仍然沒(méi)有做出明確的認(rèn)定；在瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓后相關(guān)責(zé)任的承擔(dān)上,也還有一些需要完善之處。 筆者通過(guò)對(duì)理論觀(guān)點(diǎn)與實(shí)踐做法的梳理和系統(tǒng)分析,綜合考慮社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序、經(jīng)濟(jì)交易安全、經(jīng)濟(jì)交易效率、社會(huì)公平公正等法律價(jià)值目標(biāo),采用歸納分析及演繹推理,以及實(shí)證研究的方法,提出一些自己的見(jiàn)解,期待對(duì)這些問(wèn)題的解決提供有益的幫助。 全文分為引言、正文、和結(jié)語(yǔ)三個(gè)部分： 引言簡(jiǎn)述了文章寫(xiě)作的目的和意義,對(duì)研究范圍所存在的限制進(jìn)行了一定的說(shuō)明,并指出了文章主要內(nèi)容。 正文第一部分對(duì)瑕疵股權(quán)進(jìn)行了理論分析。這部分首先對(duì)瑕疵股權(quán)的概念進(jìn)行了界定。其次將瑕疵出資股權(quán)常見(jiàn)的分類(lèi)進(jìn)行了歸納。 第二部分分析了瑕疵出資股權(quán)應(yīng)有的限制。 第三部分進(jìn)行瑕疵出資股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同效力的研究。首先列明了理論界和司法實(shí)務(wù)中對(duì)瑕疵出資股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同的效力所存在的不同學(xué)說(shuō)。然后筆者在采納可撤銷(xiāo)說(shuō)的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)可撤銷(xiāo)說(shuō)提出了一定的修改意見(jiàn),以期能更符合理論和實(shí)踐的要求。 第四部分分析了我國(guó)瑕疵出資股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓后的相應(yīng)責(zé)任界定。提出了對(duì)《公司法司法解釋三》的一些完善建議。結(jié)語(yǔ)部分對(duì)全文進(jìn)行了綜述和總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:The prerequisite for equity transfer is that shareholders acquire shares through the way they contribute to the target company. The new Company Law, which came into effect on 2006, allows shareholders to contribute in instalments and encourages the diversity of non-monetary contributions. This is conducive to the healthy development of the economy, but the construction of the integrity system of the whole society in our country is lagging behind at present, which objectively intensifies the risk of the defect of shareholders' capital contribution, which leads to the existence of defective stock right. The problems of defective shares in the process of transfer emerge one after another, which seriously impacts the stability and harmony of our country's social economy. The introduction of the provisions of the Supreme people's Court on the application of the PRC Company Law (3) > ['] has filled some gaps in the provisions on the transfer of defective shares in the past commercial laws and judicial interpretations in China. However, the validity of the defective equity transfer contract is still not made a clear determination; in the transfer of defective shares, there are still some responsibilities to be improved. Through combing and systematic analysis of the theory and practice, the author synthetically considers the legal value objectives of social economic order, economic transaction security, economic transaction efficiency, social fairness and justice, and adopts inductive analysis and deductive reasoning. As well as the empirical research method, put forward some own opinion, hope to provide beneficial help to solve these problems. The full text is divided into three parts: introduction, text, and conclusion:. The introduction briefly describes the purpose and significance of writing, explains the limitations of the scope of research, and points out the main contents of the article. The first part of the text makes a theoretical analysis of defective equity. Firstly, the concept of defective equity is defined. Secondly, the common classification of defective equity is summarized. The second part analyzes the limitation of defective investment equity. In the third part, the author studies the validity of the equity transfer contract with defective capital contribution. Firstly, it lists the different theories in theory and judicial practice on the validity of the equity transfer contract of defective capital contribution. Then the author adopts the theory of revocability. Some suggestions on revocability theory are put forward in order to meet the requirements of theory and practice. In the 4th part, the author analyzes the definition of the corresponding liability after the transfer of the defective capital contribution in China, and puts forward some suggestions for the perfection of the Judicial interpretation of Company Law. The conclusion part summarizes and summarizes the full text.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 李國(guó)慧;;研究公司法務(wù) 指導(dǎo)審判實(shí)踐——就新《公司法》適用中若干疑難問(wèn)題訪(fǎng)最高人民法院民二庭庭長(zhǎng)宋曉明[J];法律適用;2007年04期

2 符秋艷;股東出資瑕疵的損害及其防范[J];合肥工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年03期

3 徐娟,杜莉;瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的有關(guān)法律問(wèn)題[J];廣西社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年10期

4 陽(yáng)子龍,王歷勝;論出資瑕疵股東對(duì)公司債權(quán)人的民事責(zé)任[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年05期

5 夏雅麗,丁學(xué)軍;論商法的特征及基本原則[J];西北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 葛勇;瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同法律效力研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2008年

2 劉東方;瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓問(wèn)題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

3 勾昭慶;有限責(zé)任公司瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的相關(guān)法律問(wèn)題[D];華東政法大學(xué);2009年

4 崔曉冉;公司瑕疵出資人股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓問(wèn)題研究[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

5 王婷婷;論有限責(zé)任公司瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1562134