本文關(guān)鍵詞： 瑕疵股權(quán) 有限公司 合同效力 股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓 責(zé)任承擔(dān)　出處：《上海交通大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：關(guān)于瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓所引發(fā)的法律問(wèn)題,各地司法部門曾相繼出臺(tái)過(guò)一些指導(dǎo)意見(jiàn)。但是由于各地法院理解不一,導(dǎo)致這類案件裁判結(jié)果相互矛盾,嚴(yán)重影響了司法裁判的公信力。近年來(lái),有關(guān)瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的案件大量出現(xiàn),這引起了商法學(xué)界和實(shí)務(wù)界的高度關(guān)注。為解決審判實(shí)踐中該類問(wèn)題,最高人民法院在近期出臺(tái)的《中華人民共和國(guó)公司法若干問(wèn)題的規(guī)定(三)》(以下簡(jiǎn)稱“公司法解釋(三)”)中對(duì)瑕疵出資股東權(quán)利的限制以及受讓人在知情情況下的責(zé)任承擔(dān)問(wèn)題作出了明確規(guī)定。但該解釋對(duì)瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓引發(fā)的問(wèn)題仍留有大量空白,瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓中仍存在諸多的疑難問(wèn)題尚待解決,如:瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同效力的認(rèn)定;瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同雙方對(duì)公司、守約股東及公司債權(quán)人的責(zé)任承擔(dān)問(wèn)題等。 本文主要分析有限責(zé)任公司中瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同效力認(rèn)定及民事責(zé)任承擔(dān)的法律問(wèn)題。筆者在對(duì)瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓相關(guān)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行梳理的基礎(chǔ)上,根據(jù)合同法和公司法的一般原則,對(duì)瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同的效力認(rèn)定及合同雙方責(zé)任承擔(dān)做出法理解釋,以期為審判實(shí)踐提供參考。本文一共分為三個(gè)部分: 第一章是瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓概述。首先,界定了瑕疵股權(quán)的一般含義并介紹其分類。本文中,筆者對(duì)瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓相關(guān)問(wèn)題的探討是指從其狹義,即由于股東出資瑕疵而導(dǎo)致的瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓問(wèn)題;其次,筆者對(duì)瑕疵股權(quán)的可轉(zhuǎn)讓性進(jìn)行了分析。筆者的結(jié)論是股東瑕疵出資并不必然要否定其股東資格,瑕疵股權(quán)可以作為股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的客體,但是也應(yīng)當(dāng)對(duì)瑕疵股權(quán)出讓人的權(quán)利進(jìn)行適當(dāng)限制。 第二章圍繞瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同效力進(jìn)行分析。筆者首先對(duì)瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同效力的各種學(xué)說(shuō)進(jìn)行了評(píng)析,并得出了“區(qū)分對(duì)待說(shuō)”具有相對(duì)合理性的結(jié)論。筆者接下來(lái)對(duì)瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同效力的認(rèn)定方法進(jìn)行了闡述,即可通過(guò)對(duì)瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓人及受讓人的意思表示來(lái)界定瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同的效力,并在此列舉了一些司法案例與相關(guān)規(guī)定以說(shuō)明司法實(shí)踐部門在此問(wèn)題上的態(tài)度,從而佐證筆者觀點(diǎn)。 第三章探討了瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓后瑕疵出資責(zé)任承擔(dān)問(wèn)題。對(duì)于責(zé)任的承擔(dān),理論界與實(shí)務(wù)界眾說(shuō)紛紜,為探討較為合理的解決思路,筆者對(duì)責(zé)任承擔(dān)的不同學(xué)說(shuō)進(jìn)行了評(píng)析,并列舉了各地司法機(jī)關(guān)相關(guān)規(guī)定及案例。在此基礎(chǔ)上,筆者以責(zé)任對(duì)象為劃分標(biāo)準(zhǔn),詳細(xì)討論了瑕疵出資股東與受讓人對(duì)公司、守約股東以及公司債權(quán)人的民事責(zé)任。
[Abstract]:With regard to the legal issues arising from the transfer of defective shares, the local judicial authorities have issued some guidance opinions one after another. However, due to the different understandings of the courts in various localities, the judicial results of such cases are contradictory. In recent years, there have been a large number of cases concerning the transfer of defective shares, which has aroused great concern in the field of business law and practice. In order to solve this kind of problems in trial practice, The restrictions on the Rights of defective investors in the recent provisions of the people's Republic of China's Company Law (3) (hereinafter referred to as "Company Law interpretation (3)") and the informed circumstances of the transferee. However, this explanation still leaves a large number of gaps in the problems arising from the transfer of defective shares. There are still many difficult problems to be solved in the transfer of defective shares, such as the determination of the validity of the defective equity transfer contract, the liability of the parties to the defective equity transfer contract to the company, the shareholders in compliance and the creditors of the company, and so on. This paper mainly analyzes the legal problems of the validity of the defective equity transfer contract and the civil liability in the limited liability company. On the basis of combing the related problems of the defective equity transfer, the author bases on the general principles of the contract law and the company law. In order to provide reference for the trial practice, the author makes a legal explanation of the validity of the defective equity transfer contract and the liability of both parties to the contract. This paper is divided into three parts:. The first chapter is an overview of the transfer of defective equity. Firstly, it defines the general meaning of defective equity and introduces its classification. In this paper, the author discusses the problems related to the transfer of defective equity from its narrow sense. Secondly, the author analyzes the transferability of defective shares. The conclusion is that the defective capital contribution does not necessarily negate the qualification of shareholders. Defective equity can be regarded as the object of equity transfer, but it should also restrict the rights of the transferor. The second chapter analyzes the validity of the defective equity transfer contract. Finally, the author concludes that the theory of differentiated treatment is relatively reasonable. Then, the author expounds the methods of determining the validity of the contract of transfer of defective shares. We can define the validity of the defective equity transfer contract by means of the expression of intention of the transferor and the transferee of defective equity, and enumerate some judicial cases and relevant provisions to illustrate the attitude of judicial practice departments on this issue. Thus supporting the author's point of view. The third chapter discusses the responsibility of defective capital contribution after the transfer of defective shares. There are different opinions on the responsibility of the liability, in order to explore a more reasonable solution, the author comments on different theories of responsibility. On the basis of this, the author discusses the civil liability of the shareholders and the transferee of defective capital contribution to the company, the contract holders and the creditors of the company.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李慧;;瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓相關(guān)問(wèn)題研究[J];研究生法學(xué);2010年06期

2 古錫麟;李洪堂;;股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓若干審判實(shí)務(wù)問(wèn)題[J];法律適用;2007年03期

3 馮果;論公司股東與發(fā)起人的出資責(zé)任[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1999年03期

4 羅培新;胡改蓉;;瑕疵出資與公司司法解散之若干問(wèn)題——2006年華東政法學(xué)院公司法律論壇綜述[J];法學(xué);2006年12期

5 趙宇霞;;瑕疵出資股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同效力問(wèn)題探究[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年25期

6 孫有強(qiáng);違反出資義務(wù)的民事法律責(zé)任比較研究[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

7 趙德芳,劉月榮;對(duì)股東出資瑕疵的法律問(wèn)題思考[J];中國(guó)工商管理研究;2004年01期

8 李振華;論公司人格否認(rèn)[J];湖北經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年05期

9 楊宏;;瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的若干法律問(wèn)題[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)刊;2011年01期

10 王慧芳;;股東瑕疵出資民事責(zé)任問(wèn)題探討[J];科學(xué)之友;2010年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 陳秀麗;瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓問(wèn)題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2004年

2 段鈞;有限責(zé)任公司股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓制度研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2004年

3 王洪龍;有限責(zé)任公司股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的若干法律問(wèn)題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2006年

4 王曉瓊;瑕疵出資股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓問(wèn)題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

5 金瑋;論瑕疵出資股東的權(quán)利限制[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2007年

6 宋寰寧;股東瑕疵出資法律責(zé)任比較研究[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2008年

7 畢金營(yíng);瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的效力及責(zé)任承擔(dān)[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年

8 劉東方;瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓問(wèn)題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

9 崔曉冉;公司瑕疵出資人股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓問(wèn)題研究[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

10 于敏;論出資瑕疵股權(quán)的轉(zhuǎn)讓[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1514292