本文關(guān)鍵詞：一人公司犯罪的犯罪主體類型辨析　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 一人公司 犯罪主體類型 自然人犯罪 單位犯罪

【摘要】：憑借公司與股東責(zé)任分離以及經(jīng)營方式靈活的優(yōu)勢，一人公司作為一種事實(shí)形態(tài)長期并廣泛存在。2005年，修訂后的新《公司法》出臺(tái)，在法律層面承認(rèn)了一人公司的法人地位，自此，自然人一人或法人一人獨(dú)自出資設(shè)立有限責(zé)任公司有了法律依據(jù)。但是，，一人公司作為新生事物，1997年《刑法》修訂時(shí)，尚未在公司法層面獲得法人地位的認(rèn)可，于是《刑法》也并未將其納入單位犯罪的規(guī)制范疇。新修訂的《公司法》明確承認(rèn)一人有限責(zé)任公司的法人地位后，在其之后出臺(tái)的司法解釋以及2006年、2009年、2011年的第六、七、八次刑法修正案均未涉及一人公司有關(guān)內(nèi)容。在刑法及司法解釋未有明確規(guī)定的情況下，對(duì)一人公司犯罪應(yīng)如何處置，一人公司是否具有刑事主體地位，換言之其是否能夠成為刑法上的主體被納入刑法評(píng)價(jià)的范疇，仍有頗多爭議，至于一人公司被納入刑法調(diào)整的范疇后對(duì)其應(yīng)按照自然人犯罪定罪還是按照單位犯罪處罰更是困擾司法實(shí)務(wù)的難題。本文以承認(rèn)一人公司應(yīng)被納入刑法調(diào)整范疇為前提，對(duì)一人公司犯罪應(yīng)按自然人犯罪定罪量刑還是按照單位犯罪處置分別情況加以辨析，并以一人公司的分類為基礎(chǔ)，分別對(duì)自然人一人公司犯罪和法人一人公司犯罪如何進(jìn)行刑法規(guī)制、如何確定其犯罪主體類型做了具體分析。 本文由三部分組成，第一部分以現(xiàn)有的《公司法》和《刑法》規(guī)定為基礎(chǔ)對(duì)一人公司的有關(guān)法律規(guī)定進(jìn)行概述，包括一人公司的定義、我國《公司法》立法賦予一人公司法人地位的意義及其對(duì)刑法適用產(chǎn)生的影響及挑戰(zhàn)，進(jìn)而闡述確認(rèn)其單位犯罪主體地位的刑法意義。 在第一部分已明確闡述一人公司理應(yīng)受刑法調(diào)整的基礎(chǔ)上，第二部分針對(duì)自然人一人公司犯罪的犯罪主體類型進(jìn)行辨析，即結(jié)合自然人一人公司的特點(diǎn)以及單位犯罪的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，對(duì)一人公司犯罪應(yīng)以自然人主體身份還是單位主體身份接受刑法調(diào)整加以梳理和辨析，并對(duì)不同情形下的受刑主體進(jìn)行簡要分析。 第三部分針對(duì)法人一人公司的犯罪主體類型進(jìn)行了辨析，本部分仍然是結(jié)合法人一人公司的特點(diǎn)及單位犯罪的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)對(duì)其犯罪主體類型加以辨析，并分別情形討論法人一人公司與法人股東分別成立單位犯罪的幾種情形以及成立共同犯罪的可能性。
[Abstract]:With the advantage of the company and the shareholder responsibility separation and flexible mode of operation, a company as a form of fact long and widely exists in.2005, the new "Company Law > revised introduction, the legal level of recognition of one person's legal status, since then, a natural person or legal person alone funded Co. Ltd. has a legal basis. However, one man company as a new thing," the criminal law revised in 1997, has not obtained the legal status in the company law recognized, so < criminal law did not be included in the scope of regulation of the unit crime. "The newly revised Company Law > clear recognition of one person limited liability company after the introduction of legal status, after the judicial interpretation in 2006 and 2009, sixth, seventh in 2011, the eight amendment to the criminal law were not involved in a company related content. In the criminal law and judicial interpretation has not been clearly defined. Under the conditions of how to dispose of one person company crime, whether a company has the criminal subject status, in other words whether it can become the subject of criminal law on criminal law is included in the evaluation scope, there are still a lot of controversy, as for one company to be included in the scope of the adjustment of the criminal law should be in accordance with the personal crime or according to the punishment of unit crime is a difficult problem in judicial practice. In this paper, one person company should be included in the regulation of the criminal law is the premise of a company should be convicted of the crime of natural person crime sentencing or in accordance with the unit crime disposal situation respectively to analyze and classify a company based on a person, respectively. The crime of natural person and legal person, a company how to carry out the crime criminal law, how to define the crime type to make a specific analysis.
This paper consists of three parts, the first part of the existing "company law" and "criminal law" provisions on the basis of one company's relevant laws and regulations are summarized, including the definition of one-man company law > < Company Legislation of our country one-man company legal status and the significance of the application of criminal law to produce and influence the challenge, then elaborated the meaning of criminal law to confirm the status of the subject of unit crime.
Based on the first part has a clear explanation of a company should be adjusted by the criminal law, analyze the second part of the main crime for one-man company crime types, standard features combined with the natural person one man company and the crime, to a person of company crime should be the subject of natural person or unit to identity identity accept the criminal law to comb and analysis, and the different circumstances of the criminal subject is analyzed briefly.
The third part analyses the subject of crime in the one-man company legal type, this part is still the standard of one-man company legal characteristics and the analysis of the unit crime subject of crime types, and respectively discussed the one-man company legal and corporate shareholders were set up in several cases of unit crime and the possibility to set up a common crime.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 黎宏;論單位犯罪的主觀要件[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2001年04期

2 黎宏;美國近年來的法人刑事責(zé)任理論述評(píng)[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1999年01期

3 毛玲玲;;新公司法背景下一人公司的刑法地位探析[J];法學(xué);2006年07期

4 宮為所;;一人公司刑法地位探悉[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

5 楊興培;(法人)單位犯罪立法理論與實(shí)踐運(yùn)作的逆向評(píng)價(jià)[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年03期

6 黎宏;;日本近年來的刑事實(shí)體立法動(dòng)向及其評(píng)價(jià)[J];中國刑事法雜志;2006年06期

7 黎宏,單民;德國的法人刑事責(zé)任論述評(píng)[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 記者　 許震寧;[N];南京日?qǐng)?bào);2006年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 石磊;單位犯罪關(guān)系論[D];中國人民大學(xué);2004年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 錢元昌;淺析一人公司的刑事主體地位[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

2 陳碧文;澳大利亞法人犯罪及其刑事責(zé)任研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2007年

本文編號(hào)：1426509