本文關(guān)鍵詞：企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包合同的異質(zhì)性與制度建構(gòu)　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包合同 管理型內(nèi)部承包 獨(dú)立型內(nèi)部承包 SBU

【摘要】：內(nèi)部承包合同是指企業(yè)與企業(yè)內(nèi)部人員之間簽訂的,關(guān)于一定時間內(nèi),企業(yè)一定范圍的經(jīng)營管理權(quán)限劃分,和有關(guān)權(quán)利義務(wù)分擔(dān)的協(xié)議。該協(xié)議創(chuàng)設(shè)的法律關(guān)系有兩個方面:于內(nèi)部,企業(yè)和內(nèi)部員工進(jìn)行了權(quán)利義務(wù)的劃分;于外部該員工以企業(yè)的名義從事生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營,與第三方產(chǎn)生一定的權(quán)利義務(wù)關(guān)系。企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包合同是市場自主選擇的結(jié)果,尤其被中、小型有限責(zé)任公司廣泛適用。近年來,企業(yè)內(nèi)部市場化背景下的SBU經(jīng)營模式的出現(xiàn),使得大型股份有限公司中也更廣泛的適用企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包。但是對于何為企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包,企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包的性質(zhì)、類型、效力和司法處理意見至今都未有統(tǒng)一的規(guī)定。關(guān)于內(nèi)部承包效力的爭論,多著眼于其與《公司法》中關(guān)于公司“三權(quán)分立”層級架構(gòu)的規(guī)定是否存在沖突之上,而沒有從市場管理和企業(yè)運(yùn)行的角度,分析如何更好的發(fā)揮企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包在經(jīng)濟(jì)活動中的作用,亦未討論如何設(shè)置較為完善的企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包合同規(guī)則體系。因此,在當(dāng)前企業(yè)內(nèi)包日趨普遍的背景下,明晰企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包合同的性質(zhì)、完善企業(yè)內(nèi)部糾紛處理規(guī)范更加具有緊迫性。第一部分,文章從企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包合同的產(chǎn)生背景開始論述,剖析企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包的產(chǎn)生根源、發(fā)揮的作用和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。明確內(nèi)部承包合同的概念和類型,并提出本文主要研究的對象為企業(yè)獨(dú)立型內(nèi)部承包合同。提出管理型內(nèi)部承包因?yàn)閷儆谄髽I(yè)的內(nèi)部管理措施,不具有外部性,屬于法律不應(yīng)干涉的公司自治范疇,因此對其的分析采取簡單略過的方式。第二部分,文章對當(dāng)前學(xué)術(shù)界有關(guān)企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包合同效力的觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了簡要的介紹,并提出自己的觀點(diǎn)。學(xué)界觀點(diǎn)主要分為三種:“無效說”、“有效說”和“折衷說”。分析的重點(diǎn)是其是否違反了公司法的強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范。筆者首先從《公司法》的相關(guān)規(guī)范是否為“效力性強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范”入手,進(jìn)而從企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包合同對公司的影響是否與《公司法》的基本原則和精神相悖的角度進(jìn)行分析,最終筆者認(rèn)為《公司法》關(guān)于“股東會”、“董事會”、“監(jiān)事會”三會設(shè)置的規(guī)定并非強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范,企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包合同是一種全新的經(jīng)營模式,符合公司制度的精神也符合市場需求,不應(yīng)否定其意義和效力。第三部分,企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包合同的異質(zhì)性分析。探究其效力的前提是了解企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包合同與其他民事行為或者其他合同的不同之處,對其進(jìn)行異質(zhì)性分析。主要針對和其極為類似的掛靠、代理、承包經(jīng)營責(zé)任制等進(jìn)行對比,在比較中研究企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包合同的特殊性。第四部分,根據(jù)搜集到的案例資料,針對實(shí)務(wù)中對企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包合同糾紛司法處理意見不統(tǒng)一,相關(guān)部門出臺的規(guī)定不統(tǒng)一的情形,筆者認(rèn)為,應(yīng)當(dāng)加快構(gòu)建審理此類糾紛的司法解釋,并提出了完善企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包合同適用的若干建議。與學(xué)理界關(guān)于內(nèi)部承包合同效力的爭論不同,筆者更加關(guān)注如何將該經(jīng)營模式更好、更加規(guī)范地運(yùn)用于市場,如何提供司法保障,該種保障應(yīng)當(dāng)不僅包括產(chǎn)生糾紛后的救濟(jì),還應(yīng)包括制度設(shè)計(jì)層面的預(yù)防,即提供一定的原則性、倡導(dǎo)性規(guī)范,盡量減少企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包合同采用過程中的漏洞,盡可能地規(guī)避風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。
[Abstract]:The internal contract refers to the internal personnel signed between the enterprise and enterprise, for a certain period of time, the management authority enterprises in certain range, and share the relevant rights and obligations of the agreement. The Agreement establishes the legal relationship in two aspects: inside enterprises and internal staff of the division of rights and obligations to the outside; the staff in the name of the enterprise engaged in production, have a certain relationship between rights and obligations of the contract and the third party. The internal contracting market is the result of self selection, especially in small, limited liability company is widely used. In recent years, the enterprise internal market under the background of the SBU business model, which is applicable to the enterprise of large Limited by Share Ltd more extensive internal contract. But what is the internal contracting business, property, internal contracting enterprise type, and the effectiveness of judicial opinions so far have not unified The provisions on the effectiveness of the internal contract. In the debate, and the company law provisions on the < > "three powers" hierarchy whether there is a conflict on the focus, but not from the market management and enterprise operation angle, analysis how to better play the role of internal contracting enterprises in economic activities, nor discuss how to set up the internal contract rules more perfect system of enterprises. Therefore, more and more common in the current enterprise under the background of the package, the contract clear nature of internal enterprises, improve the internal disputes more has urgency. In the first part, the article discusses from the background of enterprise internal contracting contract, analysis of the internal contract the origin, function and practical significance. The concept and types of the internal contract, and puts forward the enterprise independent inside the main object of this paper The contract is proposed. The internal contract management due to the enterprise's internal management measures, does not have externalities, belonging to the company autonomous law should not interfere, so take a simple way to skip the analysis. The second part, the effect of the current academic circles about the internal contract view are introduced briefly., and put forward their own views. The academic point of view is mainly divided into three types: "invalid", "effective" and "compromise". The analysis is focused on whether the violation of the mandatory norms of the company law. The author starts from the relevant norms of company law is < > "effectiveness of the mandatory norms of then, analysis from the enterprise internal contracting contract impact on the company and whether the company law > < the basic principles and contrary to the spirit, I believe that the ultimate" Company Law > about "shareholders", "board of directors", "Board of supervisors" three will set the provisions are not mandatory norms, the contract of enterprise internal contracting is a kind of new business model, in line with the company spirit of the system is also in line with market demand, should not deny its meaning and effect. The third part analyses the heterogeneity of enterprise contract. The contract is the premise to explore the validity of contracts the internal contract and other civil acts or other contract differences, analysis of the heterogeneity of the. Mainly for its extremely similar and anchored, the agent contract responsibility system and compared the particularity of enterprise internal contracting contract in comparison. In the fourth part, according to the data collected, according to the is not uniform on the contract disputes of internal judicial opinions in practice, the provisions of the relevant departments issued a unified situation, the author thinks, should speed up the construction of this kind of dispute our hearing Explain, and puts forward some suggestions on perfecting the contract enterprise internal contract. And the academic circles on the effectiveness of internal contract dispute, the author pays more attention to how the business model is better, more standardized and used in the market, how to provide judicial protection, the security should include not only remedy dispute, also prevention should include system design level, which provides a certain principle, advocate the norm, to reduce the internal contracting contract with the loopholes in the process as much as possible to avoid risks.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 葉子榮;企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包合同主體之我見[J];政治與法律;1989年02期

2 周重和;錢衛(wèi)清;;審理企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包合同糾紛的幾個問題[J];法治論叢;1990年04期

3 肖敏;企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包的法律問題探討[J];社會科學(xué)研究;1991年05期

4 周冠五;搞活大中型企業(yè)的基礎(chǔ)和兩項(xiàng)最基本的工作[J];領(lǐng)導(dǎo)科學(xué);1992年06期

5 藍(lán)星興;;企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包若干法律問題的探討[J];法治論叢;1992年06期

6 王建東;楊國鋒;;施工企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包制的演進(jìn)與出路[J];法治研究;2012年08期

7 陳杰三;工商企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包合同的法律調(diào)整初探[J];西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1985年02期

8 馬春庭 ,關(guān)中翔;試論企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包合同的法律特征與法律效力[J];法學(xué);1985年07期

9 單述;處理企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包合同糾紛之我見[J];法學(xué);1985年10期

10 王金清;論企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包合同的性質(zhì)以及法律特征[J];中國勞動科學(xué);1986年12期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前5條

1 張?zhí)?企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包不是“只包不管”[N];建筑時報(bào);2007年

2 任永忠;企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包稅收征管亟待加強(qiáng)[N];甘肅經(jīng)濟(jì)日報(bào);2006年

3 孫賢程;企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包不能簡單視作非法經(jīng)營[N];建筑時報(bào);2007年

4 袁文報(bào);合伙企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包虧損的分擔(dān)[N];人民法院報(bào);2006年

5 記者 楊永生邋通訊員 何澤;鹽湖工商“六條措施”整頓非煤礦山[N];山西經(jīng)濟(jì)日報(bào);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 侯博知;企業(yè)內(nèi)部承包合同的異質(zhì)性與制度建構(gòu)[D];西南政法大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號：1355830