發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-05-28 11:56

【摘要】：少數(shù)意見(jiàn)的產(chǎn)生是合議庭論辯特質(zhì)的邏輯結(jié)果。在我國(guó),合議庭少數(shù)意見(jiàn)公開(kāi)具有作為法官自我表演的媒介、培養(yǎng)法官職業(yè)尊榮感、提升司法裁判的準(zhǔn)確性、促進(jìn)司法公正和司法權(quán)威的提升等諸多制度利益,而當(dāng)前的司法改革也為少數(shù)意見(jiàn)公開(kāi)提供了必要的環(huán)境支持。因此,在推動(dòng)裁判文書實(shí)質(zhì)公開(kāi)的過(guò)程中,應(yīng)推行合議庭少數(shù)意見(jiàn)的公開(kāi),但為保障法官自由獨(dú)立地發(fā)表評(píng)議意見(jiàn),不宜通過(guò)公開(kāi)合議庭評(píng)議筆錄的方式公開(kāi)少數(shù)意見(jiàn)。
[Abstract]:The emergence of minority opinions is the logical result of the characteristics of collegial panel arguments. In our country, the minority opinions of the collegial panel have many institutional interests, such as the media of judges' self-performance, the cultivation of judges' professional honor, the improvement of the accuracy of judicial judgment, the promotion of judicial justice and judicial authority, and so on. The current judicial reform also provides the necessary environmental support for the public opinion of the minority. Therefore, in the process of promoting the substantive publicity of judicial documents, the publicity of minority opinions of collegial panel should be carried out, but in order to ensure that judges express their opinions freely and independently, it is not appropriate to disclose minority opinions by means of public transcripts of collegial panel deliberations.
【作者單位】： 南京師范大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：福建省教育廳中青年教師教育科研項(xiàng)目“合議庭運(yùn)行機(jī)制研究”(JAS160043)階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：D926.2
，

本文編號(hào)：2487033