【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達是一種新的社會現(xiàn)象,它是隨著網(wǎng)絡(luò)的發(fā)展而產(chǎn)生的。與傳統(tǒng)的民意表達相比網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達表現(xiàn)出許多不同之處,如缺乏有效地監(jiān)管、運行機制不同于傳統(tǒng)民意表達、網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達更具時效性、具有很強的隨意性、容易快速形成合力、范圍更廣等等,它對司法獨立也將產(chǎn)生巨大的影響。本文主要從網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達的產(chǎn)生、網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達對司法獨立的影響、網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達與司法獨立關(guān)系的合理定位、協(xié)調(diào)網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達與司法獨立關(guān)系的制度構(gòu)建四個部分入手,旨在對網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達影響司法獨立的現(xiàn)象做出合理的解釋,尋求能夠協(xié)調(diào)二者關(guān)系的制度構(gòu)建,從而改良我國長期被網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意干預的司法環(huán)境。 第一章“網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達概述”分為三節(jié)。第一節(jié)“網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達的產(chǎn)生”主要是從網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達這一新生事物入手,界定了網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達的定義。第二節(jié)“網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達與普通民意表達的差別”通過對比網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達與普通民意表達的特征,進一步介紹網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達。第三節(jié)“網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達的社會效應”通過正反兩方面分析了網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達對社會各界的影響后果。 第二章“網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達對司法獨立的影響”分為三節(jié)。第一節(jié)“網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達影響司法獨立的表現(xiàn)”通過正反兩方面來展開闡述,具體說明了網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達對司法獨立的監(jiān)督作用和消極影響作用。第二節(jié)“網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達影響司法獨立的實證分析”主要通過三個現(xiàn)實案例來分析網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達如何影響司法獨立。第三節(jié)“網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達影響司法獨立的原因和途徑”主要從原因和途徑兩個方面向深層次分析網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達影響司法獨立這一現(xiàn)象。 第三章“網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達與司法獨立關(guān)系的合理定位”分為兩節(jié)。第一節(jié)“網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達和司法獨立的價值沖突”主要通過分別分析網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達和司法獨立的價值追求,從而得出二者在價值追求上的沖突。第二節(jié)“網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達與司法獨立關(guān)系的理想定位模式”通過分析兩種已有的司法模式的缺陷,得出了二者理想的定位模式,即適度封閉和溝通的司法模式。 第四章“協(xié)調(diào)網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達與司法獨立關(guān)系的制度構(gòu)建”分為七節(jié)。每一節(jié)列出了一種制度構(gòu)建框架,包括建立新聞發(fā)言人制度、建立科學的民意溝通表達機制、完善人民陪審制度、加強網(wǎng)絡(luò)的機關(guān)機制、嚴格法官準入制度、借鑒“專家咨詢制度”和“法庭之友”、規(guī)范判決書說理制度等等。
[Abstract]:Network public opinion expression is a new social phenomenon, it is with the development of the network. Compared with the traditional public opinion expression, the network public opinion expression shows many differences, such as the lack of effective supervision, the operating mechanism is different from the traditional public opinion expression, the network public opinion expression is more timely and has very strong arbitrariness. It is easy to form force quickly, wider scope, and so on, it will also have a great impact on the independence of the judiciary. This article mainly from the network public opinion expression emergence, the network public opinion expression to the judicial independence influence, the network public opinion expression and the judicial independence relations reasonable orientation, coordinates the network public opinion expression and the judicial independence system construction four parts, The purpose of this paper is to make a reasonable explanation of the influence of network public opinion expression on judicial independence and to seek a system that can coordinate the relationship between them so as to improve the judicial environment which has been interfered by network public opinion for a long time in our country. The first chapter "Network Public opinion expression Summary" is divided into three sections. The first section "the emergence of the network public opinion expression" mainly from the network public opinion expression this new thing, has defined the network public opinion expression definition. The second section, "the difference between network public opinion expression and common public opinion expression", further introduces the network public opinion expression by comparing the characteristics of network public opinion expression and common public opinion expression. The third section "the social effect of the network public opinion expression" through the positive and negative two aspects analyzes the network public opinion expression to the society all walks of life influence the consequence. The second chapter "the influence of network public opinion expression on judicial independence" is divided into three sections. The first section "the expression of network public opinion affects the performance of judicial independence" through both positive and negative aspects, specifically explains the network of public opinion expression on judicial independence supervision and negative impact role. The second section "the empirical analysis of the influence of network public opinion expression on judicial independence" mainly through three practical cases to analyze how the network public opinion expression affects judicial independence. The third section, "the reasons and ways of the influence of network public opinion expression on judicial independence", analyzes the phenomenon of the influence of network public opinion expression on judicial independence from two aspects: one is the reason and the other is the other. The third chapter is divided into two sections: the reasonable orientation of the relationship between network public opinion expression and judicial independence. The first section, "the value conflict between network public opinion expression and judicial independence", mainly analyzes the value pursuit of network public opinion expression and judicial independence respectively, so as to draw a conclusion of the conflict between the two in the pursuit of value. The second section, "the ideal positioning mode of the relationship between network public opinion expression and judicial independence", through analyzing the defects of two existing judicial models, obtains the ideal positioning mode of the two models, that is, the judicial mode of moderate closure and communication. The fourth chapter is divided into seven sections: coordinating the relationship between network public opinion expression and judicial independence. Each section sets out a framework for the construction of the system, including the establishment of a press spokesman system, the establishment of a scientific public opinion communication and expression mechanism, the improvement of the people's jury system, the strengthening of the institutional mechanism of the network, and the strict system of access to judges. Draw lessons from "expert consultation system" and "amicus curiae", standardize judgment reasoning system and so on.
【學位授予單位】：南京師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 盧子娟;論媒介與司法的關(guān)系之重構(gòu)[J];采.寫.編;2005年01期

2 馬莉萍;;法律推理的邏輯形式與價值判斷的和諧[J];法律方法;2002年00期

3 于秀艷;美國的法庭之友[J];法律適用;2005年04期

4 柯嵐;人民陪審員:"陪而不審"不如"不陪而審" 對現(xiàn)行人民陪審員制度的幾點質(zhì)疑[J];法律適用;2005年09期

5 趙繪宇;蔡永彤;;刑事訴訟中的民意滲透與司法應對[J];法律適用;2009年11期

6 楊海霞;;判決書說理研究[J];法制與社會;2007年05期

7 莫曉宇;;民意的刑事政策分析:一種雙向考量后的揚棄[J];甘肅政法學院學報;2007年03期

8 劉李明;;社會輿論與司法審判互動的個案研究[J];甘肅政法學院學報;2007年06期

9 傅賢國;;司法裁判吸納民意機制之建構(gòu)[J];貴州民族學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2009年04期

10 王貴東;;判決書結(jié)構(gòu)及其說理功能[J];學理論;2008年08期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前4條

1 李文俊;民意與司法關(guān)系研究[D];上海交通大學;2007年

2 林海健;媒體監(jiān)督司法的法律問題研究[D];湖南大學;2009年

3 吳耿;網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意表達研究[D];廈門大學;2009年

4 郜占川;民意對量刑的影響考量[D];蘭州大學;2009年

，

本文編號：2471908