主審法官辦案責(zé)任制研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-05-08 03:04
【摘要】：縱觀整個(gè)人類社會(huì)各個(gè)歷史時(shí)期,人們對(duì)司法公正的要求越來(lái)越高,并且一直在追尋司法能夠公平、公正,而法官對(duì)司法公正具有重要的影響。法官是“法律由精神王國(guó)進(jìn)入現(xiàn)實(shí)王國(guó)控制社會(huì)生活關(guān)系的大門(mén),法律借助法官而降臨塵世”。然而,隨著我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展,帶來(lái)了各種社會(huì)問(wèn)題。急劇變化的社會(huì)也使得我國(guó)社會(huì)糾紛明顯地增多。法院在承擔(dān)社會(huì)矛盾、解決社會(huì)矛盾的角色上發(fā)揮了積極重要的作用。但是,面對(duì)日益增多的案件數(shù)量,法官的壓力越來(lái)越大。,改革法院審判權(quán)運(yùn)行機(jī)制,提高法官辦案的質(zhì)量與效率事不宜遲。我國(guó)正處于司法體制改革的關(guān)鍵時(shí)期,司法體制改革的核心在于提高司法公信力,提高司法公信力的關(guān)鍵在于能否讓法官獨(dú)立公正行使審判權(quán),從而真正實(shí)現(xiàn)“讓審理者裁判、由裁判者負(fù)責(zé)”。在我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中,法官在辦案過(guò)程中的獨(dú)立審判權(quán)缺乏制度上的充分保障。法官在辦案過(guò)程中造成的冤假錯(cuò)案也時(shí)有發(fā)生。為了提高我國(guó)主審法官的辦案質(zhì)量以及防止冤假錯(cuò)案的發(fā)生,黨的十八屆三中全會(huì)明確提出改革主審法官辦案責(zé)任制度。2014年最高人民法院發(fā)布的《人民法院第四個(gè)五年改革綱要(2014-2018)》也將“完善主審法官、合議庭辦案責(zé)任制”作為關(guān)鍵環(huán)節(jié),并提出了相關(guān)的配套改革措施。由此可見(jiàn),主審法官辦案責(zé)任制已經(jīng)成為我國(guó)當(dāng)前司法改革中的重要環(huán)節(jié)。我國(guó)在主審法官責(zé)任制改革的過(guò)程中,無(wú)論在理論還是在實(shí)踐上均取得了較好的成果。但是,在主審法官的責(zé)任制改革中仍然存在著一些問(wèn)題。因此,對(duì)主審法官辦案責(zé)任制開(kāi)展研究仍具有較強(qiáng)的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。本論文主要分為三個(gè)部分:第一部分對(duì)我國(guó)主審法官責(zé)任制的一般理論進(jìn)行了分析。首先,從概念界定入手,對(duì)主審法官、主審法官責(zé)任制進(jìn)行初步探討。其次,對(duì)主審法官責(zé)任制產(chǎn)生的理論基礎(chǔ)進(jìn)行分析,主要從權(quán)責(zé)一致、司法公正、司法效率三個(gè)方面對(duì)主審法官辦案責(zé)任制的產(chǎn)生作出深入的分析。再次,著眼于法學(xué)理論的角度,從消除司法行政化弊端、完善司法權(quán)力運(yùn)行機(jī)制、提升司法公信力、實(shí)現(xiàn)審判統(tǒng)一四個(gè)方面闡述主審法官辦案責(zé)任制的價(jià)值基礎(chǔ),為后文的論述打下堅(jiān)實(shí)的理論基礎(chǔ)。第二部分闡述了主審法官責(zé)任制實(shí)施中的現(xiàn)實(shí)困擾。從主審法官辦案責(zé)任制具體實(shí)施入手,總結(jié)實(shí)施過(guò)程中存在的問(wèn)題,從相關(guān)配套制度不夠完善、主審法官的主體地位有待加強(qiáng)、主審法官權(quán)力范圍不確定、主審法官追責(zé)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不夠明確四個(gè)方面對(duì)主審法官辦案責(zé)任制加以剖析。第三部分提出了完善主審法官責(zé)任制的路徑。根據(jù)第二部分提出的主審法官辦案責(zé)任制在實(shí)施中存在的問(wèn)題,從完善相關(guān)配套制度、突出主審法官辦案的主體地位、厘清主審法官的權(quán)力范圍、明確主審法官責(zé)任認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)四個(gè)方面對(duì)完善主審法官責(zé)任制提出改進(jìn)意見(jiàn),以便主審法官辦案責(zé)任制更好地在實(shí)施過(guò)程中運(yùn)行。
[Abstract]:Throughout the history of human society, people's demand for judicial justice is getting higher and higher, and it has always been in the pursuit of justice to be fair and fair, and the judge has an important influence on the judicial justice. The judge is a "The law is the door of the spiritual kingdom to enter the real kingdom to control the social life, and the law comes to the earth with the aid of a judge.". However, with the rapid development of our economy, various social problems have been brought forward. The rapidly changing society also makes the social dispute of our country increase obviously. The court plays an active and important role in the role of social contradictions and social contradictions. However, in the face of the increasing number of cases, the pressure of the judges is increasing. It is not very late to reform the operation mechanism of the jurisdiction of the court and to improve the quality and efficiency of the judge's case handling. Our country is in the critical period of the reform of the judicial system, the core of the judicial system reform is to improve the judicial credibility, and the key to the improvement of the credibility of the judicial system is whether the judge can exercise the jurisdiction independently and impartially, so as to truly realize the "The judge of the judge who is in charge of the judge.". In the judicial practice of our country, the judge's independent trial in the process of handling the case lacks the full guarantee of the system. The justice of the judge in the process of the handling of the case has also occurred. in order to improve the handling quality of the presiding judge in our country and to prevent the occurrence of the false and false cases, The Third Plenary Session of the 18th Session of the Communist Party of the People's Court of the People's Court of the People's Court of the People's Court of the People's Court issued by the Supreme People's Court in 2014 put forward the reform outline of the fourth five-year reform of the People's Court (2014-2018), as well as the "Improve the responsibility system of the presiding judge and the collegial panel" as the key link, and put forward relevant reform measures It can be seen that the responsibility system of the presiding judge has become an important link in the current judicial reform in our country. In the course of the reform of the responsibility system of the presiding judge, China has achieved good results both in theory and in practice. However, there are still some problems in the responsibility system reform of the presiding judge. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to carry out the research on the handling responsibility system of the presiding judge. The thesis is divided into three parts: the first part analyses the general theory of the responsibility system of the presiding judge in China. First, from the definition of concept, the responsibility system of the presiding judge and the presiding judge should be discussed. Secondly, the author analyzes the theoretical basis of the responsibility system of the presiding judge, and makes an in-depth analysis of the responsibility system of the presiding judge on the basis of the three aspects of the accrual, the judicial justice and the judicial efficiency. Thirdly, based on the angle of the law theory, the paper expounds the value basis of the responsibility system of the presiding judge in four aspects, such as the elimination of the malpractices of the administration of justice, the improvement of the operation mechanism of the judicial power, the promotion of the credibility of the judicial system and the realization of the unification of the trial, and lays a solid theoretical foundation for the following discussion. The second part expounds the real problem in the implementation of the responsibility system of the presiding judge. Starting with the implementation of the responsibility system for handling the case of the presiding judge, the problems existing in the implementation process are summarized, the main status of the presiding judge is to be strengthened, and the power scope of the presiding judge is not determined. The judge's accountability standard of the presiding judge is not clear, and the case-handling responsibility system of the presiding judge is analyzed. The third part puts forward the way to improve the responsibility system of the presiding judge. according to the problems existing in the implementation of the case-handling responsibility system of the presiding judge put forward by the second part, It is clear that four aspects of the criteria for determining the responsibility of the presiding judge are to improve the responsibility of the presiding judge, so that the responsibility system of the presiding judge can be better operated in the course of implementation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D926.2
本文編號(hào)：2471569
[Abstract]:Throughout the history of human society, people's demand for judicial justice is getting higher and higher, and it has always been in the pursuit of justice to be fair and fair, and the judge has an important influence on the judicial justice. The judge is a "The law is the door of the spiritual kingdom to enter the real kingdom to control the social life, and the law comes to the earth with the aid of a judge.". However, with the rapid development of our economy, various social problems have been brought forward. The rapidly changing society also makes the social dispute of our country increase obviously. The court plays an active and important role in the role of social contradictions and social contradictions. However, in the face of the increasing number of cases, the pressure of the judges is increasing. It is not very late to reform the operation mechanism of the jurisdiction of the court and to improve the quality and efficiency of the judge's case handling. Our country is in the critical period of the reform of the judicial system, the core of the judicial system reform is to improve the judicial credibility, and the key to the improvement of the credibility of the judicial system is whether the judge can exercise the jurisdiction independently and impartially, so as to truly realize the "The judge of the judge who is in charge of the judge.". In the judicial practice of our country, the judge's independent trial in the process of handling the case lacks the full guarantee of the system. The justice of the judge in the process of the handling of the case has also occurred. in order to improve the handling quality of the presiding judge in our country and to prevent the occurrence of the false and false cases, The Third Plenary Session of the 18th Session of the Communist Party of the People's Court of the People's Court of the People's Court of the People's Court of the People's Court issued by the Supreme People's Court in 2014 put forward the reform outline of the fourth five-year reform of the People's Court (2014-2018), as well as the "Improve the responsibility system of the presiding judge and the collegial panel" as the key link, and put forward relevant reform measures It can be seen that the responsibility system of the presiding judge has become an important link in the current judicial reform in our country. In the course of the reform of the responsibility system of the presiding judge, China has achieved good results both in theory and in practice. However, there are still some problems in the responsibility system reform of the presiding judge. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to carry out the research on the handling responsibility system of the presiding judge. The thesis is divided into three parts: the first part analyses the general theory of the responsibility system of the presiding judge in China. First, from the definition of concept, the responsibility system of the presiding judge and the presiding judge should be discussed. Secondly, the author analyzes the theoretical basis of the responsibility system of the presiding judge, and makes an in-depth analysis of the responsibility system of the presiding judge on the basis of the three aspects of the accrual, the judicial justice and the judicial efficiency. Thirdly, based on the angle of the law theory, the paper expounds the value basis of the responsibility system of the presiding judge in four aspects, such as the elimination of the malpractices of the administration of justice, the improvement of the operation mechanism of the judicial power, the promotion of the credibility of the judicial system and the realization of the unification of the trial, and lays a solid theoretical foundation for the following discussion. The second part expounds the real problem in the implementation of the responsibility system of the presiding judge. Starting with the implementation of the responsibility system for handling the case of the presiding judge, the problems existing in the implementation process are summarized, the main status of the presiding judge is to be strengthened, and the power scope of the presiding judge is not determined. The judge's accountability standard of the presiding judge is not clear, and the case-handling responsibility system of the presiding judge is analyzed. The third part puts forward the way to improve the responsibility system of the presiding judge. according to the problems existing in the implementation of the case-handling responsibility system of the presiding judge put forward by the second part, It is clear that four aspects of the criteria for determining the responsibility of the presiding judge are to improve the responsibility of the presiding judge, so that the responsibility system of the presiding judge can be better operated in the course of implementation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D926.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 劉素君;柳德新;;論主審法官責(zé)任制的功能定位與實(shí)現(xiàn)路徑[J];河北法學(xué);2016年06期
2 孫偉峰;;主審法官辦案責(zé)任制的現(xiàn)實(shí)困擾與治理——基于基層法庭視角的考察[J];湖南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年06期
3 任鳴;;最高人民法院發(fā)布《人民法院第四個(gè)五年改革綱要》[J];法律適用;2014年08期
4 傅國(guó)慶;姜明川;王云閣;張燕;賀俊青;魯曉勇;;關(guān)于優(yōu)化審判人力資源配置情況的調(diào)研報(bào)告[J];山東審判;2014年01期
5 北京市海淀區(qū)人民法院課題組;魯為;;優(yōu)化基層法院審判資源配置的調(diào)研報(bào)告——以審判人力資源配置為中心[J];人民司法;2011年19期
6 姚遠(yuǎn)光;;兩大法系法官地位差異成因芻議[J];湘潭師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年02期
7 王宏;王明華;;法官內(nèi)部考核機(jī)制研究[J];山東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年01期
8 張明乃,陸福興;司法行政化對(duì)司法公正的危害[J];湖南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年06期
9 陳太紅;主審法官負(fù)責(zé)制的實(shí)現(xiàn)條件及當(dāng)前應(yīng)解決的問(wèn)題[J];西昌師范高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期
10 張衛(wèi)平;論我國(guó)法院體制的非行政化——法院體制改革的一種基本思路[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2000年03期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條
1 尹曉宇;;中國(guó)法院著力糾正重大冤假錯(cuò)案[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào)海外版;2017年
2 王爾德;;“主審法官責(zé)任制帶來(lái)的新問(wèn)題需盡快明確”[N];21世紀(jì)經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào)道;2014年
3 米健;;法治國(guó)家與法官國(guó)家[N];人民法院報(bào);2003年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條
1 陳耘;主審法官制度構(gòu)建研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2016年
2 裴永展;責(zé)權(quán)利視角下的民事主審法官辦案責(zé)任制[D];昆明理工大學(xué);2016年
3 武讓芳;主審法官責(zé)任制研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2015年
4 王丹丹;我國(guó)法院主審法官責(zé)任制問(wèn)題研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2015年
5 朱萸;法官職業(yè)保障制度研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2015年
6 李菊;我國(guó)法官考核制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2013年
，本文編號(hào)：2471569
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2471569.html
最近更新
教材專著
