發(fā)布時間：2019-02-17 19:20

【摘要】：在現代社會,自由的新聞輿論監(jiān)督與獨立的司法,是現代文明社會不可或缺的組成部分,是民主社會的重要標志,也是通行的國際準則。新聞輿論對法院審判的監(jiān)督意味著公眾通過媒體這一意識形態(tài)方式對司法領域里的組織及其成員的行為及行為方式實施的評價和約束,使之符合社會正義的行為要求。它是社會強有力的制衡力量,是最具有廣泛性、道義性的監(jiān)督形式。而法院獨立行使審判權,是指審判權為法院所專有,因而是一種排他性權力,即除法院之外不允許其他機關行使這種職權。所有類型的社會沖突,最終皆以刑事、民事、行政訴訟的形式提交法院裁決,法院通過開庭審理,以裁決方式解決糾紛,化解沖突,維護國家法律的實施,審判權成為解決沖突的最后手段,其最終目的在于追求司法公正。新聞輿論對司法監(jiān)督的目的,與司法界追求的目標是一致的,都是為了維護并確保司法公正,兩者的目標一致,決定雙方都應為司法公正而采取積極的合作態(tài)度,因此,從理論上說,媒體與審判機關應該保持良好的關系。但是在現實社會中卻存在著錯綜復雜的關系。一方面兩者存在相輔相成、相互促進的關系,另一方面兩者之間也存在這沖突、抵制。當今學界對處理新聞輿論監(jiān)督與法院獨立審判之間的關系也存在不同的認識,本文就這個問題闡述一下作者的看法。首先,分析新聞輿論監(jiān)督與法院獨立審判的基本理論。新聞輿論監(jiān)督的內涵、法律依據及其功能;法院獨立審判的內涵、一般要求及其現實意義。其次,分析新聞輿論監(jiān)督與法院獨立審判之間的沖突。新聞輿論監(jiān)督與法院獨立審判理論上的應然關系;新聞輿論監(jiān)督與司法院獨立審判現實存在的沖突;著重分析新聞輿論監(jiān)督與法院獨立審判存在沖突的原因剖析。最后,提出平衡新聞輿論監(jiān)督與法院獨立審判沖突的具體建議。域外平衡二者關系的經驗;我國解決二者沖突的平衡點;著重提出我國平衡新聞輿論監(jiān)督與法院獨立審判間的沖突應采取的具體措施,主要從新聞輿論監(jiān)督和法院兩個方面各采取的措施。
[Abstract]:In modern society, free media supervision and independent judicature are an indispensable part of modern civil society, an important symbol of democratic society, and also an international norm. The supervision of the court trial by public opinion means that the public evaluates and restrains the behavior and behavior of the organization and its members in the judicial field through the ideological way of the media, making it conform to the behavior requirements of social justice. It is a powerful social check-and-balance force, is the most extensive, moral form of supervision. The independent exercise of judicial power by the court means that the judicial power is exclusive to the court, that is, it does not allow other organs to exercise this kind of authority except the court. All types of social conflicts are ultimately submitted to the courts for adjudication in the form of criminal, civil and administrative proceedings. The courts resolve disputes by adjudication, resolve conflicts and safeguard the implementation of national laws. Judicial power is the last means to resolve conflicts, and its ultimate aim is to pursue judicial justice. The aim of the public opinion on judicial supervision is the same as that pursued by the judicial circles, both of which are aimed at safeguarding and ensuring judicial justice, and their objectives are the same, and it is decided that both sides should adopt an active and cooperative attitude towards judicial justice. In theory, the media and the judiciary should maintain a good relationship. But in the real society, there are intricate relations. On the one hand, there is a mutually reinforcing and mutually reinforcing relationship between the two, on the other hand, there is a conflict between them. There are also different views on the relationship between the supervision of public opinion and the independent trial of the court. This paper expounds the author's views on this issue. First of all, analyze the basic theory of media supervision and independent trial. The connotation, legal basis and function of media supervision, the connotation, general requirements and practical significance of independent court trial. Secondly, the conflict between the supervision of public opinion and the independent trial of the court is analyzed. The theoretical relationship between the supervision of news public opinion and the independent trial of the court; the conflict between the supervision of news public opinion and the reality of the independent trial of the judicial court; and the analysis of the reasons for the conflict between the supervision of public opinion and the independent trial of the court. Finally, the author puts forward some concrete suggestions on balancing the conflict between media supervision and independent court trial. The experience of balancing the relationship between the two, the balance point of resolving the conflict between the two in our country; This paper puts forward the concrete measures to be taken to balance the conflict between the supervision of news public opinion and the independent trial of the court, mainly from the two aspects of the supervision of news public opinion and the court.
【學位授予單位】：河南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926.2;G219.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 李晨昱;李佳穎;;論法治社會中的輿論監(jiān)督與司法獨立之關系[J];產業(yè)與科技論壇;2008年06期

2 章潔;媒體監(jiān)督對司法獨立的影響[J];當代傳播;2005年06期

3 張艷;;淺談司法獨立與輿論監(jiān)督的博弈——從“許霆案”談起[J];法制與社會;2008年13期

4 王淵;;媒體監(jiān)督與司法獨立的法理分析[J];甘肅政法學院學報;2006年01期

5 伍芬艷,周細波;輿論監(jiān)督和我國的司法獨立——對“劉涌案”、“寶馬撞人案”的思索[J];湖南公安高等�？茖W校學報;2004年05期

6 劉娟,周艷華;論司法獨立與輿論監(jiān)督[J];河北職業(yè)技術學院學報;2005年03期

7 劉燕玲;;淺評媒體監(jiān)督與司法獨立的關系[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學院學報;2007年02期

8 毛敏耕;;論輿論監(jiān)督和司法獨立的沖突與平衡[J];市場論壇;2007年10期

9 許浩;;論輿論監(jiān)督對司法獨立的沖突[J];湖南科技學院學報;2008年10期

10 王征;;論輿論監(jiān)督與司法獨立的平衡[J];科技信息;2010年01期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 吳兢;[N];人民法院報;2006年

，

本文編號：2425510