發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-02-17 19:20

【摘要】：在現(xiàn)代社會(huì),自由的新聞?shì)浾摫O(jiān)督與獨(dú)立的司法,是現(xiàn)代文明社會(huì)不可或缺的組成部分,是民主社會(huì)的重要標(biāo)志,也是通行的國(guó)際準(zhǔn)則。新聞?shì)浾搶?duì)法院審判的監(jiān)督意味著公眾通過媒體這一意識(shí)形態(tài)方式對(duì)司法領(lǐng)域里的組織及其成員的行為及行為方式實(shí)施的評(píng)價(jià)和約束,使之符合社會(huì)正義的行為要求。它是社會(huì)強(qiáng)有力的制衡力量,是最具有廣泛性、道義性的監(jiān)督形式。而法院獨(dú)立行使審判權(quán),是指審判權(quán)為法院所專有,因而是一種排他性權(quán)力,即除法院之外不允許其他機(jī)關(guān)行使這種職權(quán)。所有類型的社會(huì)沖突,最終皆以刑事、民事、行政訴訟的形式提交法院裁決,法院通過開庭審理,以裁決方式解決糾紛,化解沖突,維護(hù)國(guó)家法律的實(shí)施,審判權(quán)成為解決沖突的最后手段,其最終目的在于追求司法公正。新聞?shì)浾搶?duì)司法監(jiān)督的目的,與司法界追求的目標(biāo)是一致的,都是為了維護(hù)并確保司法公正,兩者的目標(biāo)一致,決定雙方都應(yīng)為司法公正而采取積極的合作態(tài)度,因此,從理論上說,媒體與審判機(jī)關(guān)應(yīng)該保持良好的關(guān)系。但是在現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)中卻存在著錯(cuò)綜復(fù)雜的關(guān)系。一方面兩者存在相輔相成、相互促進(jìn)的關(guān)系,另一方面兩者之間也存在這沖突、抵制。當(dāng)今學(xué)界對(duì)處理新聞?shì)浾摫O(jiān)督與法院獨(dú)立審判之間的關(guān)系也存在不同的認(rèn)識(shí),本文就這個(gè)問題闡述一下作者的看法。首先,分析新聞?shì)浾摫O(jiān)督與法院獨(dú)立審判的基本理論。新聞?shì)浾摫O(jiān)督的內(nèi)涵、法律依據(jù)及其功能;法院獨(dú)立審判的內(nèi)涵、一般要求及其現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。其次,分析新聞?shì)浾摫O(jiān)督與法院獨(dú)立審判之間的沖突。新聞?shì)浾摫O(jiān)督與法院獨(dú)立審判理論上的應(yīng)然關(guān)系;新聞?shì)浾摫O(jiān)督與司法院獨(dú)立審判現(xiàn)實(shí)存在的沖突;著重分析新聞?shì)浾摫O(jiān)督與法院獨(dú)立審判存在沖突的原因剖析。最后,提出平衡新聞?shì)浾摫O(jiān)督與法院獨(dú)立審判沖突的具體建議。域外平衡二者關(guān)系的經(jīng)驗(yàn);我國(guó)解決二者沖突的平衡點(diǎn);著重提出我國(guó)平衡新聞?shì)浾摫O(jiān)督與法院獨(dú)立審判間的沖突應(yīng)采取的具體措施,主要從新聞?shì)浾摫O(jiān)督和法院兩個(gè)方面各采取的措施。
[Abstract]:In modern society, free media supervision and independent judicature are an indispensable part of modern civil society, an important symbol of democratic society, and also an international norm. The supervision of the court trial by public opinion means that the public evaluates and restrains the behavior and behavior of the organization and its members in the judicial field through the ideological way of the media, making it conform to the behavior requirements of social justice. It is a powerful social check-and-balance force, is the most extensive, moral form of supervision. The independent exercise of judicial power by the court means that the judicial power is exclusive to the court, that is, it does not allow other organs to exercise this kind of authority except the court. All types of social conflicts are ultimately submitted to the courts for adjudication in the form of criminal, civil and administrative proceedings. The courts resolve disputes by adjudication, resolve conflicts and safeguard the implementation of national laws. Judicial power is the last means to resolve conflicts, and its ultimate aim is to pursue judicial justice. The aim of the public opinion on judicial supervision is the same as that pursued by the judicial circles, both of which are aimed at safeguarding and ensuring judicial justice, and their objectives are the same, and it is decided that both sides should adopt an active and cooperative attitude towards judicial justice. In theory, the media and the judiciary should maintain a good relationship. But in the real society, there are intricate relations. On the one hand, there is a mutually reinforcing and mutually reinforcing relationship between the two, on the other hand, there is a conflict between them. There are also different views on the relationship between the supervision of public opinion and the independent trial of the court. This paper expounds the author's views on this issue. First of all, analyze the basic theory of media supervision and independent trial. The connotation, legal basis and function of media supervision, the connotation, general requirements and practical significance of independent court trial. Secondly, the conflict between the supervision of public opinion and the independent trial of the court is analyzed. The theoretical relationship between the supervision of news public opinion and the independent trial of the court; the conflict between the supervision of news public opinion and the reality of the independent trial of the judicial court; and the analysis of the reasons for the conflict between the supervision of public opinion and the independent trial of the court. Finally, the author puts forward some concrete suggestions on balancing the conflict between media supervision and independent court trial. The experience of balancing the relationship between the two, the balance point of resolving the conflict between the two in our country; This paper puts forward the concrete measures to be taken to balance the conflict between the supervision of news public opinion and the independent trial of the court, mainly from the two aspects of the supervision of news public opinion and the court.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D926.2;G219.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李晨昱;李佳穎;;論法治社會(huì)中的輿論監(jiān)督與司法獨(dú)立之關(guān)系[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)與科技論壇;2008年06期

2 章潔;媒體監(jiān)督對(duì)司法獨(dú)立的影響[J];當(dāng)代傳播;2005年06期

3 張艷;;淺談司法獨(dú)立與輿論監(jiān)督的博弈——從“許霆案”談起[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年13期

4 王淵;;媒體監(jiān)督與司法獨(dú)立的法理分析[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

5 伍芬艷,周細(xì)波;輿論監(jiān)督和我國(guó)的司法獨(dú)立——對(duì)“劉涌案”、“寶馬撞人案”的思索[J];湖南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

6 劉娟,周艷華;論司法獨(dú)立與輿論監(jiān)督[J];河北職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

7 劉燕玲;;淺評(píng)媒體監(jiān)督與司法獨(dú)立的關(guān)系[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

8 毛敏耕;;論輿論監(jiān)督和司法獨(dú)立的沖突與平衡[J];市場(chǎng)論壇;2007年10期

9 許浩;;論輿論監(jiān)督對(duì)司法獨(dú)立的沖突[J];湖南科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年10期

10 王征;;論輿論監(jiān)督與司法獨(dú)立的平衡[J];科技信息;2010年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 吳兢;[N];人民法院報(bào);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2425510