發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-02-15 15:43

【摘要】：現(xiàn)代法治社會(huì)的理念中,司法獨(dú)立與輿論監(jiān)督一直是兩股相互交織在一起的旋律。一個(gè)要“獨(dú)”,一個(gè)要“督”,這就導(dǎo)致二者的交融與摩擦始終沒(méi)有停止過(guò)。 隨著民主法治進(jìn)程的不斷發(fā)展,我國(guó)法治社會(huì)建設(shè)的要求也不斷提高,法治社會(huì)要求國(guó)家法律能夠更全面、直觀、立體的參與到社會(huì)生活中,而司法在這其中就起到了極其重要的作用,這時(shí)為了更好地實(shí)現(xiàn)司法公正,推進(jìn)建設(shè)社會(huì)主義法治國(guó)家進(jìn)程,就不可避免的對(duì)司法獨(dú)立提出了更高的要求。而與此同時(shí),民眾要求對(duì)司法權(quán)監(jiān)督的呼聲也越來(lái)越高,這是由于現(xiàn)代新聞傳播媒介的飛速發(fā)展,信息化、數(shù)字化、網(wǎng)絡(luò)化的時(shí)代到來(lái),公眾在獲取信息,行使監(jiān)督權(quán)時(shí)對(duì)新聞媒介的依賴性也越來(lái)越大,而輿論監(jiān)督的監(jiān)督模式日趨完善,能動(dòng)用的監(jiān)督形式日益多樣化,其監(jiān)督深度較之以往條件下不可比擬,監(jiān)督涉及到司法活動(dòng)的方面也更加廣泛。這樣一來(lái),司法機(jī)關(guān)在行使司法權(quán)過(guò)的過(guò)程中,就會(huì)不自覺(jué)地表現(xiàn)出對(duì)輿論監(jiān)督的排斥性。這就有可能導(dǎo)致輿論監(jiān)督在審判實(shí)踐中與審判獨(dú)立的沖突與摩擦不斷加劇。 筆者寄希望在文中通過(guò)了解司法獨(dú)立與輿論監(jiān)督產(chǎn)生的來(lái)龍去脈,特別是其在我國(guó)的發(fā)展歷程,分析它們發(fā)生沖突的癥結(jié)之所在,在學(xué)習(xí)西方如何化解沖突的同時(shí),結(jié)合我國(guó)目前的立法現(xiàn)狀及司法活動(dòng)中的實(shí)際情況,探討在審判實(shí)踐中,如何平衡司法獨(dú)立與輿論監(jiān)督這二者之間的關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:In modern legal society, judicial independence and public opinion supervision are two intertwined melodies. One wants "independence" and the other "governor", which leads to the blending and friction between the two never stopped. With the continuous development of democracy and the rule of law, the requirements of the construction of the rule of law society in our country are also increasing. The society of the rule of law requires the national law to participate in the social life more comprehensively, intuitively and stereoscopically. But the judicature has played the extremely important role in this, at this time in order to realize the judicial justice better, promotes the construction socialism legal system country process, inevitably put forward the higher request to the judicial independence. At the same time, the voice of the public for supervision of judicial power is also increasing. This is due to the rapid development of the modern news media, the arrival of an era of information, digitization and networking, and the public is getting information. When exercising the supervisory power, the dependence on the news media becomes more and more, while the supervision mode of public opinion supervision is becoming more and more perfect, the forms of supervision that can be used are becoming more diversified, and the depth of supervision is incomparable to that under the previous conditions. Oversight is also more extensive in terms of judicial activities. In this way, the judiciary in the exercise of judicial power, will unconsciously show the exclusion of public opinion supervision. This may lead to conflicts and frictions between public opinion supervision and trial independence in trial practice. The author hopes that through understanding the background of judicial independence and public opinion supervision, especially its development course in China, I hope to analyze the crux of their conflicts, and learn how to resolve conflicts in the West at the same time. Combined with the current legislative situation and the actual situation of judicial activities in our country, this paper discusses how to balance the relationship between judicial independence and public opinion supervision in judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D926;G206

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 蔡沂;微博圍城[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2423498