【摘要】：正2012年7月1日即將施行的《關(guān)于辦理減刑、假釋案件具體應(yīng)用法律若干問題的規(guī)定》第26條規(guī)定:人民法院審理減刑、假釋案件,可以采用書面審理的方式。但下列案件,應(yīng)當(dāng)開庭審理:(一)因服刑人員有重大立功表現(xiàn)提請減刑的;(二)提請減刑的起始時間、間隔時間或者減刑幅度不符合一般規(guī)定的;(三)在社會上有重大影響或社會關(guān)注度高的;(四)公示期間收到投訴意見的;(五)人民檢察院有異議的;(六)人民法院認(rèn)為有開庭審理必要的。從而較之2010年2月8日印發(fā)的《關(guān)于貫徹寬嚴(yán)相濟
[Abstract]:On July 1, 2012, Article 26 of the provisions on the specific Application of Law to commutation and Parole cases stipulates that the people's Court may hear commutation and parole cases in writing. However, the following cases shall be heard in court: (1) where the sentence is commuted because of his or her great meritorious service; (2) if the initial time, interval or extent of commutation of the sentence is not in conformity with the general provisions; (3) having great influence on the society or having a high degree of social concern; (4) receiving complaints during the publicity period; (5) the people's procuratorates having objections; and (6) where the people's court deems it necessary to hold a court session to hear the case. This compares with the report issued on February 8, 2010, on the implementation of the "combination of leniency and severity"
【作者單位】： 浙江大學(xué)法學(xué)院;浙江省寧波市中級人民法院;
【分類號】：D925.2;D926.2

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳如春,王發(fā)強;對減刑假釋案件開庭審理方式的探討[J];天津市政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2000年01期

2 范春生;沈陽中院探索減刑假釋新機制[J];w，

本文編號：2419516