發(fā)布時間：2019-02-08 17:08

【摘要】：刑事偵查活動作為刑事訴訟的一個準(zhǔn)備階段,在整個刑事訴訟過程中占有著重要的地位,是偵破案件、收集犯罪證據(jù)并據(jù)以證實(shí)犯罪的重要過程,并與其后的起訴、審判相銜接形成一個完整的刑事訴訟過程。正是偵查活動所承擔(dān)的這一重要任務(wù),使得偵查機(jī)關(guān)或部門與犯罪嫌疑人的對抗最為激烈,而為了偵破案件、證明犯罪,維護(hù)刑法所保護(hù)的法益和社會秩序,往往賦予偵查機(jī)關(guān)或部門以強(qiáng)大的偵查權(quán),這一方面為收集證據(jù)、查明犯罪事實(shí)提供了保障,另一方面也在事實(shí)上拉大了偵查機(jī)關(guān)或部門與犯罪嫌疑人的實(shí)力對比,使得犯罪嫌疑人的合法權(quán)益極易受到偵查權(quán)的不當(dāng)侵害。我國憲法規(guī)定人民檢察院是國家的法律監(jiān)督機(jī)關(guān),對于公安、國安等偵查機(jī)關(guān)及檢察院內(nèi)部的自偵部門的偵查活動負(fù)有監(jiān)督職權(quán)。但由于我國目前的刑事訴訟模式重配合而輕監(jiān)督以及立法方面的欠缺,致使檢察機(jī)關(guān)的偵查監(jiān)督權(quán)不能得到充分地發(fā)揮。基于此,應(yīng)不斷加強(qiáng)檢察機(jī)關(guān)的偵查監(jiān)督權(quán),通過賦予檢察機(jī)關(guān)對于偵查活動啟動與終止的決定權(quán)、加強(qiáng)對強(qiáng)制措施的審查權(quán)以及完善偵查監(jiān)督等手段,使檢察機(jī)關(guān)的偵查監(jiān)督職能得以充分發(fā)揮。其次應(yīng)硬化偵查監(jiān)督的措施,賦予檢察機(jī)關(guān)以偵查權(quán)、明確檢察機(jī)關(guān)在偵查監(jiān)督中的制裁權(quán)、明確檢察機(jī)關(guān)引導(dǎo)偵查的權(quán)力、切實(shí)做好非法證據(jù)排除工作,使得偵查監(jiān)督的效力得以強(qiáng)化。再次還應(yīng)擴(kuò)大檢察機(jī)關(guān)偵查監(jiān)督的范圍,將所有強(qiáng)制措施的適用納入到偵查監(jiān)督的范圍內(nèi),歸案撤回提捕制度以及監(jiān)督偵查機(jī)關(guān)法律適用問題,使得偵查活動全部納入法律監(jiān)督的范圍之內(nèi)。最后還應(yīng)加強(qiáng)對自偵案件的監(jiān)督力度,將自偵案件與普通刑事案件的偵查置于同等的監(jiān)督之下。
[Abstract]:As a preparatory stage of criminal proceedings, criminal investigation plays an important role in the whole process of criminal proceedings. It is an important process of detecting cases, collecting criminal evidence and proving the crime. The trial converges to form a complete criminal procedure. It is precisely this important task of investigation activities that makes the confrontation between the investigative organs or departments and criminal suspects most intense. In order to detect cases, prove crimes and maintain the legal interests and social order protected by the criminal law, The investigative organs or departments are often given powerful investigative powers. On the one hand, this provides protection for collecting evidence and finding out the facts of crimes, on the other hand, it also increases the strength of the investigative organs or departments with criminal suspects. The legitimate rights and interests of criminal suspects are vulnerable to improper infringement of investigation power. The Constitution of our country stipulates that the people's Procuratorate is the legal supervisory organ of the state, and it has the supervisory authority over the investigation activities of the investigation organs such as the public security, the national security and the procuratorate. However, due to the lack of supervision and legislation, the procuratorial organ's power of investigation and supervision can not be brought into full play. In view of this, we should constantly strengthen the procuratorial organs' power of supervision in investigation, strengthen the power of examination of coercive measures and improve the supervision of investigation by endowing the procuratorial organs with the right to decide on the initiation and termination of investigative activities, and so on. The investigation and supervision functions of procuratorial organs can be brought into full play. Secondly, we should harden the measures of investigation supervision, endow the procuratorial organ with the investigation power, clarify the sanction power of the procuratorial organ in the investigation supervision, clarify the power of the procuratorial organ to guide the investigation, and effectively do the work of excluding the illegal evidence. So that the effectiveness of investigation and supervision can be strengthened. Thirdly, we should also expand the scope of investigation and supervision of procuratorial organs, incorporate the application of all coercive measures into the scope of investigation supervision, bring back the system of arrest and arrest, and supervise the legal application of investigative organs. So that all investigation activities into the scope of legal supervision. Finally, we should strengthen the supervision of self-detection cases and put them under the same supervision as ordinary criminal cases.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926.34;D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李梁鈺;;我國偵查監(jiān)督現(xiàn)狀分析及完善[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬刊);2009年04期

2 張偉;;刑事偵查的監(jiān)督與司法控制[J];法制與社會;2009年06期

3 鄧訓(xùn)民;;刑訊逼供產(chǎn)生的原因以及防治對策思考[J];法制與社會;2009年30期

4 姚子泉;;淺議“無罪推定”原則[J];法制與社會;2010年12期

5 張麗華;;淺議“檢察引導(dǎo)偵查”機(jī)制運(yùn)行的司法效應(yīng)[J];法制與社會;2010年18期

6 郭嗣彥;許娟;;檢察引導(dǎo)偵查的價值評價[J];甘肅社會科學(xué);2008年03期

7 天津市北辰區(qū)人民檢察院課題組;王援東;;刑事訴訟監(jiān)督機(jī)制的完善與創(chuàng)新[J];河北法學(xué);2010年03期

8 陳玲;;論我國非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則[J];哈爾濱學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年03期

9 宋蕾;王媛媛;;檢察實(shí)踐視角下附條件逮捕制度分析與展望[J];中國檢察官;2009年09期

10 ;淺談人民監(jiān)督員制度外部化的問題[J];今日科苑;2010年06期

，

本文編號：2418596