【摘要】：我國在制度上尚未確立司法獨(dú)立或者司法人員獨(dú)立,僅規(guī)定了狹義的、形式上的獨(dú)立行使審判權(quán)、獨(dú)立行使檢察權(quán),現(xiàn)代意義的司法獨(dú)立在司法實(shí)踐中沒有得到良好的確立,即使狹義的審判獨(dú)立和檢察獨(dú)立仍受到來自各方的干預(yù),司法權(quán)威遭到破壞。司法獨(dú)立本身應(yīng)當(dāng)歸結(jié)為政治體制改革的范疇,但是在完成這項(xiàng)政治改革之前,我們并不是無所作為的,本文關(guān)注到司法獨(dú)立與司法人員的獨(dú)立人格有條件關(guān)系,只有獨(dú)立的人和獨(dú)立的人格才能承擔(dān)司法獨(dú)立的重大責(zé)任。筆者認(rèn)為從現(xiàn)行制度演化到真正的司法獨(dú)立,其必然過程是司法活動和管理的去行政化,本文通過對司法人員獨(dú)立人格的探討以及相關(guān)非行政化制度建設(shè)的設(shè)想,深入到司法獨(dú)立的創(chuàng)建當(dāng)中,為我國早日實(shí)現(xiàn)司法獨(dú)立盡學(xué)術(shù)思考之責(zé)。 第一部分探討司法人員的核心倫理品質(zhì)就是獨(dú)立人格。在本部分中,首先對司法人員的獨(dú)立人格進(jìn)行說明,強(qiáng)調(diào)法官、檢察官同作為司法人員,其人格既有相似處亦有差異性,由此凸顯其獨(dú)立人格的內(nèi)涵。緊接著指出研究司法人員獨(dú)立人格的深層意圖是旨在研究司法獨(dú)立的實(shí)現(xiàn)路徑。同時,對我國司法人員人格的立法、司法現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了介紹和評價,得出急需改善我國司法人員人格不夠獨(dú)立的問題。最后,提出司法人員所應(yīng)當(dāng)具有的獨(dú)立人格的具體要求及對國外立法、司法、教育、培養(yǎng)的司法人員獨(dú)立人格進(jìn)行比較研究,引出司法人員人格獨(dú)立應(yīng)包含的道德要素。 第二部分探討司法人員獨(dú)立人格及品格的重要道德要素。司法人員獨(dú)立人格的培養(yǎng)既然是司法獨(dú)立的重要基礎(chǔ),那么當(dāng)然要對司法人員的獨(dú)立人格所應(yīng)具備的要素或者說素質(zhì)進(jìn)行探討,清楚怎樣的人才能成為具有獨(dú)立人格的司法人員。 第三部分主要通過對非行政化制度的設(shè)計(jì)來保障獨(dú)立人格的實(shí)現(xiàn)。要保障司法人員獨(dú)立人格,不是一句空話,需要制度的保障。司法人員與行政人員不同,這就決定了要從非行政化的角度對制度進(jìn)行設(shè)想和建立。其中機(jī)構(gòu)獨(dú)立、上下級監(jiān)督關(guān)系的落實(shí)、司法機(jī)關(guān)考評制度的改革等等是筆者認(rèn)為保障司法人員獨(dú)立人格必需解決的問題。
[Abstract]:In our country, judicial independence or judicial independence has not been established in the system, only the narrow sense and form of independent exercise of judicial power, independent exercise of prosecutorial power, the modern sense of judicial independence in judicial practice has not been well established. Even narrow-sense judicial independence and prosecutorial independence are still subject to interference from all parties, judicial authority has been undermined. Judicial independence itself should be summed up as the scope of political system reform, but before the completion of this political reform, we are not doing nothing. This paper focuses on the conditional relationship between judicial independence and the independent personality of judicial personnel. Only an independent person and an independent personality can bear the heavy responsibility of judicial independence. The author thinks that the inevitable process from the current system to the real judicial independence is to deadministrate the judicial activities and management. This paper discusses the independent personality of the judicial personnel and the assumption of the construction of the relevant non-administrative system. Deeply into the establishment of judicial independence, for our early realization of judicial independence academic responsibility. The first part discusses the core ethical quality of judicial personnel is independent personality. In this part, first of all, the independent personality of judicial personnel is explained, emphasizing that judges, prosecutors and as judicial personnel, their personality has similarities and differences, thus highlighting the connotation of their independent personality. Then it points out that the deep intention of studying the independent personality of judicial personnel is to study the path of judicial independence. At the same time, the author introduces and evaluates the legislation and judicial status of the personality of judicial personnel in our country, and concludes that it is urgent to improve the independence of the personality of judicial personnel in our country. Finally, the author puts forward the specific requirements of independent personality for judicial personnel and makes a comparative study of the independent personality of judicial personnel in foreign countries, such as legislation, judicature, education and cultivation, and leads to the moral elements that should be included in judicial personnel's personality independence. The second part discusses the important moral elements of the independent personality and character of judicial personnel. Since the cultivation of the independent personality of judicial personnel is an important basis for judicial independence, of course, we should explore the elements or qualities of the independent personality of judicial personnel. To know what kind of person can become an independent personality of the judiciary. The third part guarantees the realization of independent personality through the design of non-administrative system. To protect the independent personality of judicial personnel is not an empty word, need the protection of the system. The judicial personnel are different from the administrative staff, which determines the assumption and establishment of the system from the angle of non-administrative. Among them, institutional independence, the implementation of supervision relationship between superior and subordinate, the reform of judicial evaluation system and so on are the problems that must be solved to ensure the independent personality of judicial personnel.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉仁文;死刑政策:全球視野及中國視角[J];比較法研究;2004年04期

2 葛磊;法院錯案追究制度分析[J];中國司法;2004年04期

3 陳錦紅;試論司法獨(dú)立及實(shí)現(xiàn)[J];河北法學(xué);2000年05期

4 韓登池;法官的邏輯與經(jīng)驗(yàn)——兼論法律推理[J];韓山師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2005年05期

5 付亮;錢飛;王國慶;;自由心證規(guī)則研究[J];科教導(dǎo)刊(上旬刊);2010年01期

6 胡健華;正確理解上下級人民法院之間的關(guān)系[J];人民司法;1988年08期

7 溫劍能;從孫萬剛案看法治理念的進(jìn)步[J];時代潮;2004年07期

8 艾佳慧;;中國法院績效考評制度研究——“同構(gòu)性”和“雙軌制”的邏輯及其問題[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2008年05期

9 歐陽順樂;人民法院獨(dú)立行使審判權(quán)的唯一之路在于改革現(xiàn)行法院體制[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1994年06期

10 謝雁湖;;檢察官自由裁量權(quán)探微[J];中國刑事法雜志;2009年02期

，

本文編號：2412718