【摘要】：近幾十年來我國社會(huì)發(fā)生了巨大的改變，加入世界貿(mào)易組織使我國的經(jīng)濟(jì)又實(shí)現(xiàn)了新的飛躍。我國也正處于經(jīng)濟(jì)體制轉(zhuǎn)型的關(guān)鍵時(shí)期，很多突發(fā)事件、公共事件、自然災(zāi)害頻繁的發(fā)生，處理不得當(dāng)就會(huì)引發(fā)范圍擴(kuò)大、人數(shù)更多的社會(huì)矛盾，處理好這些糾紛，穩(wěn)定社會(huì)秩序是保證我國經(jīng)濟(jì)又好又快發(fā)展、維護(hù)人民群眾合法利益的重要環(huán)節(jié)。面對(duì)新時(shí)期復(fù)雜的經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境，我國最高法院王勝俊院長提出了在全國開展能動(dòng)司法活動(dòng)以應(yīng)對(duì)不斷出現(xiàn)的社會(huì)糾紛。目前能動(dòng)司法活動(dòng)已經(jīng)在全國轟轟烈烈的開展起來，，但就能動(dòng)司法的理論體系還沒有完全建立起來。關(guān)于能動(dòng)司法是什么？能動(dòng)司法的性質(zhì)如何？能動(dòng)司法的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)是什么？能動(dòng)司法的實(shí)踐是什么？無論是學(xué)界還是司法界都還在進(jìn)行熱烈的討論，理論和實(shí)踐都在摸索中進(jìn)行，相信通過實(shí)踐上升到理論再由理論指導(dǎo)實(shí)踐到實(shí)踐檢驗(yàn)理論的過程會(huì)不斷的完善能動(dòng)司法的理論體系。 本文主要是從我國能動(dòng)司法的理論分析入手，對(duì)我國目前關(guān)于能動(dòng)司法的理論進(jìn)行介紹，包括能動(dòng)司法的概念、性質(zhì)和特征，總結(jié)了一些關(guān)于能動(dòng)司法的大概的、比較一致的看法。然后對(duì)司法能動(dòng)主義進(jìn)行了考察，司法能動(dòng)主義是如何產(chǎn)生的，怎樣發(fā)展的，司法能動(dòng)主義的理論與實(shí)踐，以及在理論上以及實(shí)踐中能動(dòng)司法主義與司法克制之間的爭(zhēng)論，將司法能動(dòng)主義與能動(dòng)司法進(jìn)行比較，分析其相似和不同，從司法能動(dòng)主義的理論和實(shí)踐中得到的啟示。最后對(duì)我國能動(dòng)司法的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了分析，闡述了能動(dòng)司法的優(yōu)點(diǎn)和不足，以及能動(dòng)司法需要注意的幾個(gè)問題。本文運(yùn)用了歷史分析法，社會(huì)分析法和比較分析法通過對(duì)我國的能動(dòng)司法與西方司法能動(dòng)主義的進(jìn)行分析與比較，發(fā)現(xiàn)我國能動(dòng)司法的不足學(xué)習(xí)和借鑒司法能動(dòng)主義的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和教訓(xùn)，對(duì)我國的能動(dòng)司法理論實(shí)踐體系的完善提幾點(diǎn)建議。不能否認(rèn)現(xiàn)實(shí)主義法學(xué)在全世界范圍內(nèi)已經(jīng)占據(jù)了主導(dǎo)地位，無論是司法能動(dòng)還是司法能動(dòng)主義都是現(xiàn)實(shí)主義法學(xué)思潮對(duì)司法的現(xiàn)實(shí)影響與作用，作為世界大國全球經(jīng)濟(jì)的一份子，中國的態(tài)度和做法都會(huì)對(duì)世界產(chǎn)生很大的以影響，結(jié)合中國的國情，走出既符合中國國情又能適應(yīng)全球發(fā)展的能動(dòng)司法的道路勢(shì)在必行，因此在理論和實(shí)踐中還要繼續(xù)探索，不斷檢驗(yàn)、完善我國能動(dòng)司法理論。
[Abstract]:In recent decades, great changes have taken place in our society, and China's economy has made a new leap after joining the World Trade Organization (WTO). Our country is also in a critical period of economic restructuring. Many emergencies, public events, and natural disasters occur frequently. If not properly handled, it will lead to a wider range of social contradictions and a better handling of these disputes. Stable social order is an important link to ensure the sound and rapid development of our economy and safeguard the legitimate interests of the people. Facing the complex economic environment in the new period, President Wang Shengjun of the Supreme Court of our country put forward to carry out active judicial activities in the whole country to deal with the social disputes. At present, active judicial activities have been carried out in the country, but the theoretical system of active justice has not been completely established. What about active justice? What is the nature of active justice? What is the standard of active justice? What is the practice of active justice? Both the academic and judicial circles are still engaged in heated discussions, and both theory and practice are in the process of exploration. It is believed that the theoretical system of active judicature will be continuously perfected through the process of practice to theory and then from theory to practice. This paper mainly starts with the theoretical analysis of active justice in our country, introduces the theory of active justice in our country, including the concept, nature and characteristics of active justice, and summarizes some general ideas about active justice. A more consistent view. Then it investigates judicial activism, how it comes into being, how it develops, the theory and practice of judicial activism, and the controversy between judicial activism and judicial restraint in theory and practice. This paper compares judicial activism with active judicature, analyzes its similarities and differences, and draws inspiration from the theory and practice of judicial activism. Finally, this paper analyzes the present situation of active justice in our country, expounds the advantages and disadvantages of active justice, and points out several problems needing attention in active justice. This paper uses the historical analysis method, the social analysis method and the comparative analysis method to analyze and compare the active judicature in our country and the judicial activism in the west. It is found that the deficiency of active justice in our country and the experience and lessons of judicial activism are used for reference, and some suggestions are put forward to perfect the system of active judicial theory and practice in our country. It can not be denied that realistic jurisprudence has occupied a dominant position in the world. Whether it is judicial initiative or judicial activism, it is the realistic influence and function of the realistic legal trend of thought to the judicature. As a member of the global economy of a world power, China's attitude and practices will have a great impact on the world. It is imperative that, in combination with China's national conditions, we should walk the path of dynamic justice that is both in line with China's national conditions and can adapt to global development. Therefore, in theory and practice, we should continue to explore, constantly test, and improve our active judicial theory.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張榕;;司法能動(dòng)性何以實(shí)現(xiàn)?——以最高人民法院司法解釋為分析基礎(chǔ)[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2007年05期

2 范愉;;訴前調(diào)解與法院的社會(huì)責(zé)任 從司法社會(huì)化到司法能動(dòng)主義[J];法律適用;2007年11期

3 公丕祥;;堅(jiān)持司法能動(dòng) 依法服務(wù)大局 對(duì)江蘇法院金融危機(jī)司法應(yīng)對(duì)工作的初步總結(jié)與思考[J];法律適用;2009年11期

4 公丕祥;;能動(dòng)司法與社會(huì)公信:人民法官司法方式的時(shí)代選擇——“陳燕萍工作法”的理論思考[J];法律適用;2010年04期

5 蘇力;;關(guān)于能動(dòng)司法[J];法律適用;2010年Z1期

6 顧培東;;司法能動(dòng)主義的蘊(yùn)含[J];法律適用;2010年Z1期

7 侯淑雯;;司法衡平藝術(shù)與司法能動(dòng)主義[J];法學(xué)研究;2007年01期

8 吳英姿;;司法的限度:在司法能動(dòng)與司法克制之間[J];法學(xué)研究;2009年05期

9 江必新;;能動(dòng)司法:依據(jù)、空間和限度——關(guān)于能動(dòng)司法的若干思考和體會(huì)[J];人民司法;2010年01期

10 吳英姿;;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)時(shí)代的秩序重建與法治信念——以“能動(dòng)司法”為對(duì)象的討論[J];法學(xué)論壇;2011年01期

本文編號(hào)：2393738