天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當前位置:主頁 > 法律論文 > 司法論文 >

寬嚴相濟刑事政策在監(jiān)獄行刑中的適用研究

發(fā)布時間:2018-11-07 16:25
【摘要】:寬嚴相濟是黨和國家針對當前犯罪整體態(tài)勢而確立并必定長期堅持的刑事政策,宗旨是嚴厲打擊嚴重刑事犯罪,從寬處罰一般犯罪,以寬濟嚴,從而實現(xiàn)預防和減少犯罪的目的,促進社會的和諧穩(wěn)定,其貫穿于刑事立法、司法和刑罰執(zhí)行等各環(huán)節(jié)。刑罰執(zhí)行是將裁判文書確立的刑罰付諸實施,懲罰和教育改造罪犯,從而使減少和預防刑事犯罪的政策目的得以實現(xiàn)。寬嚴相濟刑事政策完善了懲罰和預防犯罪對策體系,確立科學、合理、人道的行刑理念和方式,而刑罰的執(zhí)行是實現(xiàn)刑事政策目的的重要途徑,其執(zhí)行效果是對刑事政策的科學性、正確性、有效性的檢驗與衡量。寬嚴相濟刑事政策無疑對監(jiān)獄刑罰的執(zhí)行發(fā)揮了重要的指導作用,同時,因為監(jiān)獄布局不合理、監(jiān)獄管理理念及方式落后、立法滯后和執(zhí)法怪圈導致刑罰矯正功能未充分發(fā)揮等因素制約著寬嚴相濟刑事政策的在監(jiān)獄行刑中的深入貫徹。解決上述問題,關鍵是引入先進行刑理念,如教育刑、刑罰謙抑、行刑科學化、行刑社會化理念;完善監(jiān)獄布局及內(nèi)部結(jié)構(gòu)設置,改革監(jiān)獄管理方式,細化分類關押,推行管理分級和處遇分等直至實行開放式處遇;改造刑罰矯正制度,下放減刑、假釋的管轄權,完善減刑程序,擴大假釋的適用,提高減刑、假釋的效率等等,從而實現(xiàn)區(qū)別對待,寬嚴有別。對主觀惡性較深的嚴重刑事罪犯在監(jiān)禁上從嚴管束,在減刊、假釋上從嚴掌握,對主觀惡性較小、情節(jié)較輕的未成年犯、初犯、偶犯及喪失作案能力的病殘犯、老年犯在處遇上從松,盡量適用假釋、減刑。岡此,通過完善監(jiān)獄行刑制度以豐富寬嚴相濟刑事政策,使刑事政策與監(jiān)獄刑罰的執(zhí)行相輔相成,共同實現(xiàn)減少和預防犯罪的目的。
[Abstract]:Combining leniency with severity is a criminal policy established by the Party and the state in view of the overall situation of the current crime and must be adhered to for a long time. Its purpose is to severely crack down on serious criminal crimes, to punish ordinary crimes with leniency, and to punish them with leniency and strictness. In order to achieve the purpose of crime prevention and reduction, promote social harmony and stability, it runs through the criminal legislation, justice and penalty enforcement and other links. The execution of penalty is to carry out the penalty established in the judgment document, to punish and educate and reform the criminal, so as to realize the policy goal of reducing and preventing the criminal crime. The criminal policy of combining leniency and severity with punishment has perfected the system of punishment and crime prevention, established scientific, reasonable and humane concept and method of execution, and the execution of penalty is an important way to achieve the purpose of criminal policy. Its execution effect is the scientific, correct and effective test and measurement of criminal policy. The criminal policy of combining leniency with severity undoubtedly plays an important guiding role in the execution of prison penalty. At the same time, because of the unreasonable layout of the prison, the concept and method of prison management are backward. The lag of legislation and the strange circle of law enforcement lead to the failure to give full play to the function of penalty correction, which restricts the deep implementation of the criminal policy of combining leniency and severity in the execution of prison sentences. To solve the above problems, the key is to introduce advanced concepts of execution, such as educational punishment, penalty restraint, execution of scientific, execution of the concept of socialization; Improve the layout and internal structure of the prison, reform the way of prison management, refine the classification of detention, carry out the management classification and meet the situation, etc., until the implementation of open treatment; Reform the system of penalty correction, devolve the jurisdiction of commutation and parole, perfect commutation procedure, expand the application of parole, improve the efficiency of commutation and parole, etc. Severe criminal criminals with deeper subjective malignancy are under strict control of imprisonment, strict control in publication reduction and parole, and minor juvenile offenders, first-time offenders, occasional offenders, and disabled criminals who have less subjective malignancy and less serious circumstances. Old criminals in the place from loose, try to apply parole, commutation of sentence. Therefore, by perfecting the system of prison execution and enriching the criminal policy of combining leniency and severity, the criminal policy and the execution of prison punishment complement each other, so as to achieve the purpose of reducing and preventing crime together.
【學位授予單位】:湖南大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2011
【分類號】:D926.7

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 鄒湘高;;評“寬嚴相濟”刑事政策視野下的刑罰執(zhí)行[J];東方論壇;2008年05期

2 高銘暄;;寬嚴相濟刑事政策與酌定量刑情節(jié)的適用[J];法學雜志;2007年01期

3 儲槐植;趙合理;;構(gòu)建和諧社會與寬嚴相濟刑事政策之實現(xiàn)[J];法學雜志;2007年01期

4 彭輔順;;寬嚴相濟的刑事政策在減刑中的運用[J];前沿;2008年07期

5 羅干;;政法機關在構(gòu)建和諧社會中擔負重大歷史使命和政治責任[J];求是;2007年03期

6 馬克昌;;寬嚴相濟刑事政策芻議[J];人民檢察;2006年19期

7 安聰聰;從“嚴打”看刑罰的威懾效應[J];上海大學學報(社會科學版);2004年04期

8 傅達林;;刑事和解:從“有害的正義”到“無害的正義”[J];社會觀察;2005年12期

9 章梅娟;;我國監(jiān)獄減刑制度完善研究——從新疆兵團監(jiān)獄減刑執(zhí)行情況談起[J];行政與法;2009年02期

10 馬靜華;刑事和解制度論綱[J];政治與法律;2003年04期



本文編號:2316904

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2316904.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權申明:資料由用戶d2a3a***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要刪除請E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com