【摘要】：監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督創(chuàng)立、發(fā)展的根本宗旨在于控制監(jiān)所權(quán)力的運(yùn)行以最終實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)人權(quán)尤其是被監(jiān)管人的合法權(quán)益的保障。2008年,我國(guó)最高人民檢察院頒布了《人民檢察院監(jiān)獄檢察辦法》、《人民檢察院看守所檢察辦法》、《人民檢察院勞教檢察辦法》、《人民檢察院監(jiān)外執(zhí)行檢察辦法》(以下簡(jiǎn)稱“四個(gè)辦法”),“四個(gè)辦法”符合監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督的發(fā)展宗旨,有效地彌補(bǔ)了此前監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督相關(guān)法律規(guī)范可操作性不足的缺點(diǎn),但是由于法律效力等問題,我國(guó)監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督依然缺乏科學(xué)、合理的法律依據(jù)。加之,近年來監(jiān)所亂象層出不窮,陷入泥沼中的監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督更是引起了學(xué)界內(nèi)外的廣泛關(guān)注。為此,筆者圍繞我國(guó)監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督展開論證,以期對(duì)我國(guó)監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督的發(fā)展有所裨益。 文章共分為四個(gè)部分。首先,筆者從監(jiān)所亂象典型案例入手,經(jīng)過初步剖析得出監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督不力甚至缺失不僅是造成監(jiān)所亂象的根本原因,而且是當(dāng)前我國(guó)監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督的嚴(yán)峻現(xiàn)狀,由此明確了文章論證的核心即完善我國(guó)監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督。其次,筆者介紹了監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督的基本理論,為文章論證構(gòu)建了堅(jiān)實(shí)的理論基礎(chǔ)。然后,筆者從立法現(xiàn)狀和司法現(xiàn)狀兩方面考察了我國(guó)監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督的不足與缺陷。在這一部分中,筆者運(yùn)用歸納法總結(jié)了我國(guó)監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督的法律依據(jù),從宏觀和微觀兩個(gè)角度剖析了我國(guó)監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督在立法中存在的問題；又運(yùn)用案例分析法和實(shí)證分析法概括了我國(guó)監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督在司法實(shí)踐中所出現(xiàn)的問題,為下文完善我國(guó)監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督做好鋪墊。最后,筆者結(jié)合當(dāng)前我國(guó)監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督工作實(shí)際,借鑒了日本、俄羅斯優(yōu)秀的監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督制度,有的放矢,從制定科學(xué)、合理的監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督法律,規(guī)范監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督主體建設(shè),完善監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督相關(guān)制度和制衡監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督四個(gè)方面提出了完善我國(guó)監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督的對(duì)策及建議。
[Abstract]:The fundamental purpose of the establishment and development of the procuratorial supervision of the prison is to control the operation of the power of the prison in order to finally realize the protection of human rights, especially the legitimate rights and interests of the supervised person. In 2008, The Supreme people's Procuratorate of China promulgated the measures for the Prosecution of Prisons of the people's Procuratorates, the measures for the Prosecution of Detention facilities of the people's Procuratorates, the measures for the Procuratorates of the people's Procuratorates on Re-education through Labor, and the measures for the execution of Procuratorial measures outside the Supervision of the people's Procurator The "four measures" are in line with the development purpose of the procuratorial supervision of the prison, It effectively makes up for the shortcomings of the lack of maneuverability of the relevant legal norms of procuratorial supervision, but due to the problems of legal effectiveness, the procuratorial supervision in our country still lacks scientific and reasonable legal basis. In addition, in recent years, the chaos of prison has emerged in endlessly, and the procuratorial supervision in the mud has aroused extensive attention both inside and outside the academic circle. Therefore, the author conducts the demonstration around the procuratorial supervision of our country's prisons, in order to benefit the development of the procuratorial supervision of our country's prisons. The article is divided into four parts. First of all, the author starts with the typical cases of prison chaos, and through preliminary analysis, concludes that the lack or even lack of supervision by the procuratorial institutions is not only the root cause of the chaos in the prisons, but also the grim situation of the procuratorial supervision in our country at present. Therefore, the core of the article is to perfect the procuratorial supervision of our prison. Secondly, the author introduces the basic theory of procuratorial supervision, and builds a solid theoretical foundation for the article. Then, the author examines the deficiencies and defects of procuratorial supervision in China from the legislative and judicial aspects. In this part, the author summarizes the legal basis of procuratorial supervision in China's prisons by induction, and analyzes the problems existing in the legislation of procuratorial supervision in China from the macro and micro perspectives. It also generalizes the problems of procuratorial supervision in the judicial practice by case analysis and empirical analysis, which lays the groundwork for perfecting the procuratorial supervision in our country. Finally, the author combines the current practice of procuratorial supervision in our country's prisons, drawing lessons from the excellent procuratorial supervision system in Japan and Russia, aiming at the development of scientific and reasonable procuratorial supervision laws. The countermeasures and suggestions of perfecting the procuratorial supervision in our country are put forward in four aspects: standardizing the construction of procuratorial supervision subject, perfecting the relative system of procuratorial supervision and balancing the procuratorial supervision.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D926.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 袁仲偉;;從“躲貓貓”事件看公眾議程、媒介議程和政策議程的互動(dòng)[J];湖南大眾傳媒職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年05期

2 王建國(guó);;列寧的檢察權(quán)思想理論及其對(duì)當(dāng)代中國(guó)的影響[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年06期

3 甄貞;陳靜;;關(guān)于強(qiáng)化監(jiān)所檢察監(jiān)督若干問題的思考[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年05期

4 陳云生;;法律監(jiān)督的價(jià)值與功能[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年10期

5 王福龍;;淺談“牢頭獄霸”成因及防治對(duì)策[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

6 王順安;論監(jiān)所監(jiān)督[J];中央政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年01期

7 李志鵬;俞穎;;我國(guó)監(jiān)獄受刑人權(quán)利保障救濟(jì)的跟進(jìn)與提升——以香港申訴專員和大陸監(jiān)所檢察制度的對(duì)比為切入[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

8 王艷軍,彭輝;建立責(zé)任追究機(jī)制防控超期羈押——兼議責(zé)任追究機(jī)制中檢察機(jī)關(guān)的地位和作用[J];檢察實(shí)踐;2003年04期

9 熊霞;官平生;魯渭榮;廖澤輝;李凱;劉敏;岑崇浩;楊紓;杜俊超;鄭圣果;;在押人員頻死拷問監(jiān)管制度[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2009年05期

10 耿紅;;“三個(gè)到位”推進(jìn)駐所檢察工作[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2009年08期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 湯輝;我國(guó)看守所檢察監(jiān)督問題研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2288598