司法公信力的比較研究
[Abstract]:The Chinese characters, "public" and "public trust" contained in the words "judicial credibility" can be combined with specific context to obtain new meanings. The judicial "public" contains the following meanings: judicial power belongs to the public in the final analysis, the entire judicial system is a public service system for the public, and the judicial power should guarantee fairness and justice to the public when it operates. Finally, the judicial power is evaluated by the public. "Judicial Public Credit" refers to the social public's recognition of the judicial power and their psychological feelings of obedience according to their own operating state of judicial power. It belongs to the subjective evaluation, psychological reaction and value judgment of the subject. The popular nature of modern justice determines that justice must obtain public trust. Judicial confidence is the judicial organ, judges in the judicial process of self-identification and self-evaluation. Judicial Thaksin is a certain social public or social groups of judicial trust and evaluation. Judicial Thaksin constitutes judicial public trust, and judicial confidence and judicial Thaksin promote each other's growth. Anglo-American law system has rich experience in cultivating and maintaining judicial credibility, and its independent exercise system of judicial power, jury system, case law system, the system of optional selection of judges and the system of job security are worthy of reference. The religion, geography, war and political system of the Arab countries influence the judicial credibility. Through the analysis of the investigation report of judicial credibility, the reasons that influence the judicial credibility of China at present are obtained. Combined with theoretical analysis, this paper draws the path of improving judicial credibility in China and some suggestions to solve specific problems.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號(hào)】:D926
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 關(guān)玫;司法公信力的結(jié)構(gòu)性要素[J];長(zhǎng)春大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期
2 四川省高級(jí)人民法院課題組;李少平;郝銀鐘;;人民法院司法公信力調(diào)查報(bào)告[J];法律適用;2007年04期
3 陳越洋;;中東劇變中的青年因素分析[J];阿拉伯世界研究;2013年02期
4 安惠侯;;西亞北非政治格局變化及其走向[J];阿拉伯世界研究;2013年02期
5 陳發(fā)桂;;公眾司法參與視角下我國(guó)司法公信力的生成探析[J];前沿;2010年03期
6 北京市第一中級(jí)人民法院課題組;王明達(dá);吳在存;劉井玉;伍濤;;關(guān)于加強(qiáng)人民法院司法公信力建設(shè)的調(diào)研報(bào)告[J];人民司法;2011年05期
7 曹志瑜;;我國(guó)司法公信力建設(shè)的現(xiàn)狀分析與對(duì)策建議[J];中共天津市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2012年06期
8 江必新;;深化審監(jiān)制度改革 力促司法公信力提升[J];人民司法;2012年03期
9 姚遠(yuǎn)光;;兩大法系法官地位差異成因芻議[J];湘潭師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年02期
10 陳立軍;陳立民;;司法公信力生成基礎(chǔ)研究[J];湖南科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年04期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 李立新;中外法官管理制度比較研究[D];中南大學(xué);2010年
2 楊喜平;社會(huì)資本視野下的司法公信力[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2008年
,本文編號(hào):2207692
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2207692.html