【摘要】：司法民主、司法公正是世界各國司法工作追求的共同價(jià)值,而陪審制作為集中體現(xiàn)司法民主和司法公正的制度,它的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展經(jīng)歷了漫長的過程。時(shí)至今日,陪審制主要分為兩種,一種是以英美為代表的陪審團(tuán)制,另一種是以德法為代表的參審制。我國在借鑒各國司法經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上制定了具有中國特色的人民陪審員制度,而這項(xiàng)制度在長期的實(shí)踐應(yīng)用中卻沒有體現(xiàn)出其在立法層面上所顯示出的優(yōu)越性,存在著諸多弊端�；谶@個(gè)原因,河南省高級(jí)人民法院推出了人民陪審團(tuán)制度,并已在全省范圍內(nèi)開始試點(diǎn)。這項(xiàng)制度一經(jīng)推出,就受到了理論界和實(shí)務(wù)界的廣泛關(guān)注,得到了很多贊譽(yù)之聲但也遭到了不少批評(píng)和質(zhì)疑。 本文通過人民陪審團(tuán)制度與國外陪審制度以及我國人民陪審員制度的對(duì)比,在我國現(xiàn)行的法律框架下尋找人民陪審團(tuán)制度的合法性和必要性的依據(jù)。與此同時(shí),文中還對(duì)人民陪審團(tuán)制度的相關(guān)細(xì)節(jié)提出了一些自己的見解,以期這項(xiàng)制度的試點(diǎn)工作能夠更加順利健康的開展。
[Abstract]:Judicial democracy and judicial justice are the common values pursued by the judicial work all over the world. The jury production, which embodies the judicial democracy and the judicial justice system, has experienced a long process. Up to now, jury system is divided into two kinds, one is jury system represented by Britain and America, the other is trial system represented by Germany and France. On the basis of drawing lessons from the judicial experience of other countries, our country has established the people's jury system with Chinese characteristics, but this system has not reflected its superiority in the legislative level in the long-term practice application, and there are many disadvantages. For this reason, Henan Provincial higher people's Court has introduced the people's jury system, and has started a trial throughout the province. As soon as this system is introduced, it has been paid much attention by the theorists and practitioners, and received much praise, but it has also been criticized and questioned. Through the comparison of the people's jury system with the foreign jury system and the people's jury system of our country, this paper tries to find the basis for the legality and necessity of the people's jury system under the current legal framework of our country. At the same time, some opinions on the details of the people's jury system are put forward in order that the pilot work of this system can be carried out more smoothly and healthily.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 何家弘;;陪審制度縱橫論[J];法學(xué)家;1999年03期

2 肖揚(yáng);;當(dāng)代法律制度[J];法學(xué)家;1999年06期

3 蔣安;論我國的陪審制度與司法改革[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1999年06期

4 張衛(wèi)平;大陸法系民事訴訟與英美法系民事訴訟──兩種訴訟體制的比較分析（下）[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1996年05期

5 汪建成;;非驢非馬的“河南陪審團(tuán)”改革當(dāng)慎行[J];法學(xué);2009年05期

6 齊新;;人民陪審團(tuán)制度芻議[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年08期

7 葉青;關(guān)于人民陪審員制度價(jià)值的思考[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

8 李滿圈;;中國憲政體制下審判監(jiān)督的必然性及改革探討[J];河南社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年01期

9 許鵬;;審判新模式探索與發(fā)展——對(duì)“人民陪審團(tuán)”制度冷思考[J];和田師范專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期

10 王敏遠(yuǎn);中國陪審制度及其完善[J];法學(xué)研究;1999年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：2204702