【摘要】：作為經(jīng)由憲法賦予專門的法律監(jiān)督職能的檢察機關(guān),理所應(yīng)當有權(quán)力也有相應(yīng)的義務(wù)對行政機關(guān)的行政違法行為進行檢察監(jiān)督,但長期以來,由于只有憲法授權(quán)而沒有具體的法律授權(quán),再加上檢察院內(nèi)部重刑而輕民行的觀念,刑強而民行弱的部門格局,造成檢察院對行政違法行為的檢察監(jiān)督職能處于尷尬的若有若無境地,以往的行政違法行為的檢察監(jiān)督也處于理論的狀態(tài),隨著黨的十八屆四中全會以文件的形式確認檢察機關(guān)對行政違法行為的檢察監(jiān)督,各地開展各項對行政行為的檢察監(jiān)督,包括對行政執(zhí)法行為的檢察監(jiān)督、檢察機關(guān)提起行政公益訴訟,取得了不少成績。但由于處于摸索階段,本文借鑒國外相關(guān)制度的發(fā)展經(jīng)驗,對于實踐中出現(xiàn)的一些問題,從行政違法行為檢察監(jiān)督的本身概念出發(fā),對于違法行為的邊界、范圍、程度進行探討,對于一些存在的問題進行分析,提出自己的意見,對于從違法行為的概念、違法行為的范圍、違法行為的程度等進行概念分析,同時對啟動程序,相關(guān)制度之間的邊界進行相關(guān)研究,同時提出自己對完善檢察監(jiān)督制度的一些建議,從應(yīng)遵循的原則、對于檢察建議的完善,對于程序的規(guī)范運行提出自己的建議。全文分四個部分進行論述:第一部分對行政違法行為檢察監(jiān)督制度的一些基本理論問題進行了討論。第二部分對域外行政違法行為檢察監(jiān)督制度進行分析跟總結(jié)。第三部分對我國行政違法行為檢察監(jiān)督制度存在的問題及原因進行分析。第四部分提出了對行政違法行為檢察監(jiān)督制度完善的具體方案。
[Abstract]:As a procuratorial organ endowed with special legal supervision function by the Constitution, it is natural that it has the power and the corresponding obligation to supervise the administrative illegal acts of the administrative organs. But for a long time, Because only the constitutional authorization and no specific legal authorization, coupled with the concept that the procuratorate's internal punishment is heavy but not the people's conduct, the pattern of departments where the punishment is strong but the people are weak, If the procuratorial supervision function of procuratorates on administrative illegal acts is in an awkward situation, if there is no situation, the procuratorial supervision of administrative illegal acts in the past is also in a theoretical state. As the fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee confirmed the procuratorial supervision of administrative illegal acts by procuratorial organs in the form of documents, all localities carried out procuratorial supervision over administrative acts, including procuratorial supervision of administrative law-enforcement acts. Procuratorial Orgnaization institute administrative public interest lawsuit, obtained a lot of achievement. However, due to being in the groping stage, this paper draws lessons from the development experience of foreign related systems, for some problems in practice, starting from the concept of procuratorial supervision of administrative illegal acts, for the boundary of illegal acts, the scope, The degree of discussion, analysis of some existing problems, put forward their own opinions, from the concept of illegal acts, the scope of illegal acts, the extent of illegal activities, and so on, at the same time to start the process, At the same time, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the procuratorial supervision system, from the principles to be followed, to the perfection of the procuratorial suggestions, and to the standardized operation of the procedure. The paper is divided into four parts: the first part discusses some basic theoretical problems of procuratorial supervision system of administrative illegal acts. The second part analyzes and summarizes the procuratorial supervision system of the extraterritorial administrative illegal acts. The third part analyzes the problems and causes of the procuratorial supervision system of administrative illegal acts in China. The fourth part puts forward the concrete scheme of perfecting the procuratorial supervision system of administrative illegal acts.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D926.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 謝玉美;劉為勇;;行政違法行為檢察監(jiān)督程序論[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2017年01期

2 劉暢;肖澤晟;;行政違法行為檢察監(jiān)督的邊界[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2017年01期

3 劉華英;;違法行政行為檢察監(jiān)督實踐分析與機制構(gòu)建[J];暨南學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2016年08期

4 鄭新儉;;推進行政違法行為檢察監(jiān)督[J];人民檢察;2016年11期

5 李傲;臧榮華;;略論我國的行政檢察原則[J];法學(xué)評論;2014年05期

6 韓成軍;;具體行政行為檢察監(jiān)督的制度架構(gòu)[J];當代法學(xué);2014年05期

7 韓成軍;;行政權(quán)檢察監(jiān)督的若干思考[J];河南社會科學(xué);2014年08期

8 王利民;王兵;;民事行政檢察監(jiān)督工作存在的問題及對策[J];人民檢察;2014年14期

9 王春業(yè);;論行政訴訟法修改下的行政檢察監(jiān)督職能的強化[J];社會科學(xué)家;2014年02期

10 葛曉燕;;我國行政檢察監(jiān)督的缺陷及立法完善[J];人民檢察;2013年24期

，

本文編號：2190805