【摘要】：自人類社會(huì)以來(lái),矛盾、沖突就無(wú)時(shí)無(wú)刻不存在,為了解決這些問(wèn)題,在不同時(shí)代制定了相應(yīng)的政策法規(guī)等等以維護(hù)秩序。法院調(diào)解也是其中之一。法院調(diào)解制度是法院內(nèi)部存在的一種以相對(duì)和諧的手段解決問(wèn)題的制度,法院調(diào)解制度的真正源泉是發(fā)生在抗戰(zhàn)后期陜甘寧邊區(qū)的著名的“馬錫武審判方式”,這一審判方式第一次突破傳統(tǒng)觀念,將審判與調(diào)解,司法制度與深入群眾、調(diào)解等結(jié)合起來(lái),從而使調(diào)解融入司法制度,這就出現(xiàn)了后來(lái)的法院調(diào)解制度的建立。我國(guó)法院調(diào)解制度無(wú)論是對(duì)于個(gè)人、集體還是社會(huì)乃至整個(gè)國(guó)家來(lái)說(shuō)都發(fā)揮了不同程度的重要作用,被國(guó)際上譽(yù)為“東方經(jīng)驗(yàn)”。我國(guó)設(shè)立法院調(diào)解制度的目的首先是為了更好的為人民服務(wù),促進(jìn)了人與人之間的和諧相處,防止矛盾進(jìn)一步激化,將糾紛以一種較為和諧的手段予以解決,為人們處理矛盾提供了一個(gè)選擇的平臺(tái)。其次,法院調(diào)解適當(dāng)減輕了法院的訴訟壓力,近年來(lái),我國(guó)人們的法制觀念不斷提高,經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展越來(lái)越快,各種各樣的案件隨之而來(lái),法院所承載的審判壓力不斷加大,法院調(diào)解適當(dāng)?shù)木徑饬诉@種壓力。最后,從大的方面看設(shè)立法院調(diào)解的目的是為了維護(hù)和諧社會(huì)這個(gè)大的社會(huì)環(huán)境所必須的。在實(shí)踐中法院調(diào)解的確發(fā)揮了很大的作用,但是隨著法院調(diào)解的應(yīng)用也暴露出了一些問(wèn)題,即“以判壓調(diào)”,“久調(diào)不決”等等,筆者結(jié)合實(shí)踐,就法院調(diào)解中存在的缺陷,提出一些改革設(shè)想,以期對(duì)我國(guó)法院調(diào)解制度的發(fā)展、完善有所裨益。
[Abstract]:Since human society, contradictions and conflicts exist all the time. In order to solve these problems, the corresponding policies and regulations have been formulated in different times to maintain order. Court mediation is one of them. The court mediation system is a relatively harmonious system to solve problems within the court. The real source of the court mediation system is the famous "Ma Xiwu trial method" in the later period of the Anti-Japanese War in the Shensi-Kansu-Ningsia Border region. This way of trial breaks through the traditional concept for the first time and combines trial with mediation, judicial system with deepening the masses, mediation, and so on, thus making mediation into the judicial system, which led to the later establishment of court mediation system. The court mediation system of our country has played an important role in different degrees for individual, collective, society and even the whole country, and has been praised as "Oriental experience" in the world. The purpose of establishing the court mediation system in our country is to serve the people better, to promote the harmonious coexistence between people, to prevent the contradiction from becoming more intense, and to resolve the dispute by a more harmonious means. It provides an alternative platform for people to deal with contradictions. Secondly, court mediation has properly alleviated the court's litigation pressure. In recent years, people's concept of legal system has been constantly improved, economic development has become faster and faster, various cases have followed, and the trial pressure carried by the court has been increasing. Court mediation properly alleviated the pressure. Finally, the purpose of setting up court mediation is to maintain the social environment of harmonious society. In practice, court mediation does play a very important role, but with the application of court mediation, some problems have been exposed, that is, "to judge pressure adjustment", "long time adjustment not to decide" and so on. The author combines practice, discusses the defects existing in court mediation. Some reform ideas are put forward in order to benefit the development and perfection of our country's court mediation system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 季衛(wèi)東;中國(guó)法文化的蛻變與內(nèi)在矛盾[J];比較法研究;1987年04期

2 季衛(wèi)東;程序比較論[J];比較法研究;1993年01期

3 肖建華;楊兵;;對(duì)抗制與調(diào)解制度的沖突與融合——美國(guó)調(diào)解制度對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];比較法研究;2006年04期

4 范愉;有關(guān)調(diào)解法制定的若干問(wèn)題(下)[J];中國(guó)司法;2005年11期

5 張靈;張毅;;法院調(diào)解的概念和地位辨正[J];法學(xué)家;1999年04期

6 王紅巖;試論民事訴訟中的調(diào)審分立[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1999年03期

7 石梅堂;民事調(diào)解制度背離民訴規(guī)律[J];法學(xué);2002年12期

8 張文顯;;構(gòu)建社會(huì)主義和諧社會(huì)的法律機(jī)制[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2006年04期

9 李浩;民事審判中的調(diào)審分離[J];法學(xué)研究;1996年04期

10 吳德星;法治的理論形態(tài)與實(shí)現(xiàn)過(guò)程[J];法學(xué)研究;1996年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 鄭功成;[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李莉;論人民調(diào)解制度的發(fā)展與完善[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2184117