【摘要】：依法審理各類知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)案件,是各級(jí)人民法院知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判工作的重心。涉及知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)問(wèn)題的案件,在法院共有三大類,分別是刑事、民事、行政案件,這些案件已經(jīng)覆蓋所有知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律領(lǐng)域,使人民法院知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判職能得到了全面的發(fā)揮。在傳統(tǒng)的審判模式下,三種案件因性質(zhì)不同,由相應(yīng)的審判庭分別審理。為統(tǒng)一執(zhí)法尺度、提高訴訟效率,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判機(jī)構(gòu)的專門(mén)化已逐步成為一個(gè)國(guó)際趨勢(shì)�！秶�(guó)家知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略綱要》在“戰(zhàn)略措施”中指出,“完善知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判體制,優(yōu)化審判資源配置,簡(jiǎn)化救濟(jì)程序。研究設(shè)置統(tǒng)一受理知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)民事、行政和刑事案件的專門(mén)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法庭。研究適當(dāng)集中專利等技術(shù)性較強(qiáng)案件的審理管轄權(quán)問(wèn)題,探索建立知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)上訴法院。進(jìn)一步健全知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判機(jī)構(gòu),充實(shí)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)司法隊(duì)伍,提高審判和執(zhí)行能力�！痹谥R(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)立體審判暨“三審合一”模式下,權(quán)利人對(duì)救濟(jì)途徑的選擇具有明確的預(yù)見(jiàn)性,可以較為自由選擇最能充分保護(hù)自己權(quán)利的途徑,從而及時(shí)、有力地打擊侵權(quán)行為。同時(shí),知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判的立體保護(hù)模式能夠有效協(xié)調(diào)民事賠償與刑事罰金之間的關(guān)系,使被害人在民事案件中得到有效和到位的經(jīng)濟(jì)賠償,最大限度保護(hù)權(quán)利人的經(jīng)濟(jì)利益。由于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法官經(jīng)常接觸知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)民事侵權(quán)行為,而犯罪行為本身就是一種侵權(quán)行為,因此行為的定性對(duì)于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法官而言就變得更加容易,這樣就避免了刑事法官需要另行查找知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)專業(yè)資料等不必要的浪費(fèi)。本文第一章回顧了蘭州市第一例侵犯商業(yè)秘密案的案情及案件的審理情況,簡(jiǎn)要分析了在案件審理過(guò)程中出現(xiàn)的若干問(wèn)題,為知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)立體審判模式相關(guān)問(wèn)題的論述做了鋪墊(因本案涉及商業(yè)秘密,文中將真名隱去)；第二章審視了我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判現(xiàn)狀和特點(diǎn),通過(guò)對(duì)傳統(tǒng)審判模式的弊端分析以及國(guó)外和我國(guó)臺(tái)灣地區(qū)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判立體審判模式的實(shí)踐中做法的對(duì)比介紹,彰顯了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)立體審判模式的優(yōu)勢(shì)；第三章闡述了對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)立體審判的必要性與可行性分析,從知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)立體審判推廣的理論基礎(chǔ)出發(fā),先后對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)立體審判推廣的必要性和可行性進(jìn)行了分析,最終得出結(jié)論,在我國(guó)目前審判資源如此稀缺的情況下,“三審合一”審判模式具有合理性和必要性；第四章通過(guò)對(duì)我國(guó)各地方法院立體審判模式實(shí)踐的介紹,使讀者對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段“三審合一”的形式和內(nèi)容有所認(rèn)識(shí)；第五章在第四章的基礎(chǔ)上,針對(duì)各地實(shí)踐中知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)立體審判模式的缺陷提出了完善的對(duì)策,為該模式的全面推廣提供理論支持。
[Abstract]:Handling all kinds of intellectual property cases according to law is the focus of intellectual property trials in people's courts at all levels. There are three categories of cases involving intellectual property rights in the courts, namely, criminal, civil and administrative cases. These cases have covered all areas of intellectual property law, which has made the intellectual property trial function of the people's court fully play its role. In the traditional trial mode, the three cases are tried separately by the respective trial chambers because of their different nature. In order to unify the standards of law enforcement and improve the efficiency of litigation, the specialization of intellectual property judicial institutions has gradually become an international trend. The outline of the National intellectual property Strategy pointed out in "Strategic measures," perfecting the intellectual property trial system, " Optimize the allocation of trial resources and simplify the relief procedures. To study the establishment of specialized intellectual property courts that uniformly handle intellectual property civil, administrative and criminal cases. This paper studies the jurisdiction of appropriate centralized patent and other technical cases, and explores the establishment of an appeal court for intellectual property rights. We will further improve the intellectual property judicial institutions, enrich the intellectual property judicial team, and improve our ability to adjudicate and enforce intellectual property rights. " Under the mode of three-dimensional trial of intellectual property rights and "integration of three trials", the obligee has a clear foresight on the choice of remedies, and can freely choose the way that can fully protect his own rights, and thus promptly and forcefully crack down on infringement. At the same time, the three-dimensional protection mode of intellectual property rights trial can effectively coordinate the relationship between civil compensation and criminal fine, make the victims get effective and effective economic compensation in civil cases, and protect the economic interests of the obligee to the maximum extent. Since intellectual property judges often come into contact with intellectual property rights civil tort acts, and criminal acts are an infringement in themselves, it is easier for intellectual property judges to characterize acts. In this way, criminal judges need to look up intellectual property professional information and other unnecessary waste. The first chapter of this paper reviews the case of the first case of violation of trade secrets in Lanzhou City and the trial situation of the case, and briefly analyzes some problems in the trial of the case. It paves the way for the discussion of the issues related to the model of three-dimensional trial of intellectual property rights (as this case involves trade secrets, the real name is hidden). Chapter two examines the current situation and characteristics of intellectual property trials in China. By analyzing the disadvantages of the traditional trial mode and comparing the practices of the foreign and Taiwan intellectual property trial stereoscopic trial mode, the advantages of the intellectual property three-dimensional trial model are highlighted. The third chapter expounds the necessity and feasibility analysis of the three-dimensional trial of intellectual property, and analyzes the necessity and feasibility of the promotion of three-dimensional trial of intellectual property, starting from the theoretical basis of the promotion of three-dimensional trial of intellectual property. Finally, it is concluded that the trial mode of "three trials in one" is reasonable and necessary under the condition that the trial resources are so scarce in our country. Chapter four introduces the practice of the three-dimensional trial mode of the local courts in our country. The fifth chapter, on the basis of chapter four, puts forward some perfect countermeasures against the defects of the model of three-dimensional trial of intellectual property rights in various places. To provide theoretical support for the overall promotion of the model.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D926.2

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 高彩虹;“防火隔熱卷簾”發(fā)明專利侵權(quán)案的分析[D];蘭州大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2178256