【摘要】：反對(duì)司法審查的學(xué)者分別從規(guī)范體系、實(shí)證經(jīng)驗(yàn)和因果關(guān)系的角度論證司法審查制度的不合時(shí)宜。在此基礎(chǔ)上,他們提出通過(guò)民主來(lái)保障人權(quán)。雖然民主被官方所認(rèn)可且有較強(qiáng)的可接受性,并在一定程度上被踐行,但以民主觀反對(duì)司法審查的論者并沒(méi)有對(duì)民主進(jìn)行清晰的界定,也沒(méi)有對(duì)如何實(shí)現(xiàn)民主、如何證明民主的效用、實(shí)行民主的成本與收益提出建設(shè)性觀點(diǎn)。他們理論試錯(cuò)的態(tài)度和行為值得肯定,但他們?cè)诜磳?duì)把司法審查當(dāng)作"最后一根救命稻草"的時(shí)候,有意無(wú)意地把民主也當(dāng)作了"最后一根救命稻草"。
[Abstract]:Scholars who oppose judicial review argue that the judicial review system is out of date from the angle of normative system, empirical experience and causality. On this basis, they proposed to protect human rights through democracy. Although democracy is recognized by the government and has strong acceptability and is practiced to a certain extent, there is no clear definition of democracy by those who oppose judicial review in the view of democracy, and there is no clear definition of how to realize democracy. How to prove the utility of democracy and the cost and benefit of democracy put forward a constructive point of view. Their attitude and behavior of trial and error in theory is worthy of recognition, but when they oppose judicial review as "the last straw to save one's life", they consciously or unintentionally regard democracy as "the last straw to save one's life".
【作者單位】： 廈門大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)青年基金項(xiàng)目(10YJC820034):“轉(zhuǎn)型期積極權(quán)利的法律保障研究” 中國(guó)博士后科學(xué)基金第四十七批面上資助項(xiàng)目及第四批特別資助項(xiàng)目的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：D916

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 胡錦光;;論中國(guó)司法審查的空間[J];河南社會(huì)科學(xué);2006年05期

2 劉星;重新理解法律移植——從“歷史”到“當(dāng)下”[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年05期

3 劉東亮;;我國(guó)行政行為司法審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)之理性選擇[J];法商研究;2006年02期

4 翟小波;;代議機(jī)關(guān)至上,還是司法化?[J];中外法學(xué);2006年04期

5 王傳麗;WTO協(xié)議與司法審查[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2003年02期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張彥，

本文編號(hào)：2168191