【摘要】：在學(xué)術(shù)界和理論界,利益衡量被視為一種黃金方法。在實(shí)踐中,我國(guó)對(duì)利益衡量的內(nèi)涵和實(shí)踐運(yùn)用沒(méi)有深刻的認(rèn)識(shí)和透徹的把握,而這種方法在審判實(shí)踐中卻在普遍的在運(yùn)用。從本質(zhì)上來(lái)講,利益衡量的過(guò)程是一種主觀性行為,但對(duì)于利益衡量的方法,在實(shí)踐中的運(yùn)行規(guī)制和具體規(guī)范也尚未進(jìn)行深入的探討。從這個(gè)意義上講,這個(gè)問(wèn)題的研究具有重大的理論價(jià)值和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。論文從以下幾個(gè)方面對(duì)此問(wèn)題進(jìn)行探討：第一部分是利益衡量的概述：分析了利益衡量的概念,厘定了利益衡量的構(gòu)成元素,進(jìn)而對(duì)利益衡量的必要性和正當(dāng)性進(jìn)行解析。第二部分是利益衡量的操作：先后分析了利益衡量的一般原則和適用場(chǎng)域,這對(duì)于明確利益衡量的適用具有重要意義,且對(duì)利益衡量中存在問(wèn)題的解析是一個(gè)鋪墊性的工作。第三部分是利益衡量存在問(wèn)題及解決進(jìn)路：針對(duì)實(shí)踐中存在法官恣意的可能性：法官素質(zhì)質(zhì)疑,法官自我約束不夠,利益衡量依據(jù)與理由不夠明確,缺乏內(nèi)部社會(huì)監(jiān)督等問(wèn)題,進(jìn)行分析解構(gòu),試圖規(guī)避或提出解決進(jìn)路。最終,以期對(duì)利益衡量思路的拓展和規(guī)范利益衡量程序化操做出一定的貢獻(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:In the academic and theoretical circles, interest measurement is regarded as a golden method. In practice, our country does not have a profound understanding and thorough grasp of the connotation and practice of interest measurement, but this method is widely used in trial practice. In essence, the process of interest measurement is a kind of subjective behavior, but the method of interest measurement has not been deeply discussed in practice. In this sense, the study of this issue has great theoretical value and practical significance. This paper discusses this problem from the following aspects: the first part is an overview of the measurement of interests: analysis of the concept of interest measurement, determine the constituent elements of interest measurement, and then analyze the necessity and legitimacy of interest measurement. The second part is the operation of interest measurement: it analyzes the general principle and the applicable field of interest measurement successively, which is of great significance to make clear the application of interest measurement, and it is a work of paving the way to analyze the problems existing in interest measurement. The third part is the problem of interest measurement and the way to solve the problem: in view of the possibility of judges' arbitrariness in practice, the judges' quality is questioned, the judges' self-restraint is not enough, the basis and reason of interest measurement is not clear enough, and there is a lack of internal social supervision and so on. Analyze and deconstruct, try to avoid or propose a solution approach. Finally, we hope to make some contributions to the expansion of the thought of interest measurement and the standardization of the procedure of interest measurement.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D916

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 周瑩青;論利益衡量方法在行政審判中的運(yùn)用[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2164410