本文選題：非羈押性強制措施 + 拘傳�。� 參考：《太原科技大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：在我國當(dāng)下的司法實踐中，非羈押性強制措施的適用比例非常的低。相反，“高羈押”、“變相羈押”的問題卻一直存在。這一現(xiàn)象對保護犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的合法權(quán)益、提高訴訟效益、限制公權(quán)力不合理甚至不合法行使是不利的。造成非羈押性強制措施適用比例低的原因有兩個方面：第一是無罪推定、人權(quán)保護的思想未能很好地被大家所體會、貫徹，，非羈押性強制措施被忽視；第二是非羈押性強制措施本身在制度上還存在一定的問題，在一定程度上限制了其很好地發(fā)揮作用。 2012年新刑訴法對非羈押性強制措施的修改不盡人意，為促進我國的刑事訴訟的不斷發(fā)展、加快法治文明建設(shè)，提高非羈押性強制措施適用率、不斷完善非羈押性強制措施勢在必行。我們應(yīng)立足本國國情，科學(xué)地分析現(xiàn)在立法、司法實踐中非羈押性強制措施存在的問題，在研究國外非羈押性強制措施優(yōu)點的基礎(chǔ)上來完善我國的非羈押性強制措施的適用。
[Abstract]:In the current judicial practice of our country, the application proportion of non-custodial coercive measures is very low. On the contrary, the problem of "high custody" and "disguised detention" has always existed. This phenomenon is disadvantageous to protect the legal rights and interests of criminal suspects and defendants, improve the benefit of litigation, restrict the unreasonable or even illegal exercise of public power. There are two reasons for the low application of non-custodial coercive measures: first, the presumption of innocence, the idea of human rights protection has not been well understood by everyone, the implementation of non-custodial coercive measures are ignored; Second, there are still some problems in the system of non-custodial coercive measures, which to a certain extent limit their effectiveness. The revision of non-custodial coercive measures by the new Criminal procedure Law in 2012 is unsatisfactory. In order to promote the continuous development of criminal proceedings in our country, accelerate the construction of civilization of rule of law, improve the rate of application of non-custodial coercive measures, it is imperative to constantly perfect the non-custodial coercive measures. Based on our national conditions, we should scientifically analyze the problems existing in the present legislation and judicial practice of non-custodial coercive measures, and perfect the application of non-custodial coercive measures in our country on the basis of studying the advantages of non-custodial coercive measures in foreign countries.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：太原科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D925.2;D926

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 卞建林;;刑事程序法治化的期待——寫在《刑事訴訟法》再修改之際[J];中國司法;2008年01期

2 金宏武;我國刑事強制措施的人權(quán)保障困境與出路[J];惠州學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年01期

3 楊杰輝;;公正的渴求與資源的稀缺——略論刑事訴訟的經(jīng)濟效益價值[J];江西社會科學(xué);2006年07期

4 陳瑞華;未決羈押制度的理論反思[J];法學(xué)研究;2002年05期

5 陳衛(wèi)東,劉計劃;英國保釋制度及其對我國的借鑒意義[J];人民檢察;2003年03期

6 陳瑞華;;刑事強制措施改革的新動向與新思考[J];人民檢察;2008年24期

7 陳永生;刑事訴訟的程序性制裁[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2004年01期

8 余輝勝;;現(xiàn)行監(jiān)視居住制度的隱憂與省思[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2007年06期

9 陳光中,張小玲;中國刑事強制措施制度的改革與完善[J];政法論壇;2003年05期

10 樊崇義;刑事訴訟法再修改的理性思考[J];政法論壇;2005年05期

本文編號：2117649