本文選題：監(jiān)所開放 + 被監(jiān)管人員　； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：規(guī)范國家權(quán)力和保障公民權(quán)利是法學(xué)研究的永恒主題,為實現(xiàn)打擊犯罪與保護人權(quán)的統(tǒng)一,世界各國都授予警察限制與剝奪公民人身自由并對其進行監(jiān)管的權(quán)力,該權(quán)力的行使具有一定的特殊性,但仍應(yīng)合理使用并受到適當(dāng)?shù)耐獠勘O(jiān)督。封閉是監(jiān)獄和看守所的頑癥,缺少外部監(jiān)督的國家監(jiān)管權(quán)力,難免侵害被監(jiān)管人員的合法權(quán)利。監(jiān)所開放正是這樣一種與刑事訴訟程序緊密相連而又獨立于刑事訴訟程序的制度,它以推進監(jiān)管場所透明化為目的,致力于為被監(jiān)管人員權(quán)利救濟提供一種新的路徑。本文在分析我國監(jiān)所開放現(xiàn)狀的基礎(chǔ)上,分析并借鑒域外理論和實踐,提出構(gòu)建我國監(jiān)所開放制度的具體設(shè)想。 本文由引言、正文和結(jié)束語組成,正文共分四個部分: 第一部分,監(jiān)所開放的概述。通過對“監(jiān)所”的界定,指明了本文所研究的“監(jiān)所”的由來和范圍;通過對監(jiān)所開放涵義的闡述,說明監(jiān)所開放的主體要素是什么,并明確指出監(jiān)所開放在我國是一種新的制度,這項制度的構(gòu)建需自身努力探索,也需要借鑒國際規(guī)則及域外的做法。 第二部分,監(jiān)所開放的必要性。包括四個方面:履行政府信息公開義務(wù),保障公民知情權(quán);以司法公開促進司法公正,保障被監(jiān)管人員的人權(quán);對監(jiān)所進行治理,推進監(jiān)所法治化進程;通過保障公民權(quán)利制約與監(jiān)督國家監(jiān)管權(quán)力,擴大社會力量對監(jiān)所的監(jiān)督。 第三部分,我國監(jiān)所開放現(xiàn)狀評析,主要包括我國監(jiān)所開放取得的成績和存在的問題。從成績來看,一方面我國監(jiān)所開放的相關(guān)文件日益完善,另一方面我國監(jiān)所的實踐經(jīng)驗日益豐富;從存在的問題來看,我國監(jiān)所開放的廣度和深度不夠;我國監(jiān)所開放的隨意性較大。 第四部分,我國監(jiān)所開放的制度構(gòu)想。先闡述了監(jiān)所開放的原則:必須遵循人民主權(quán)、依法開放、適度開放、循序漸進的原則;其次闡述了監(jiān)所開放的主體,即監(jiān)獄和看守所這兩類典型的監(jiān)管場所;然后闡述了監(jiān)所開放的范圍,包括應(yīng)當(dāng)開放的范圍和不開放的范圍,范圍的確定遵循“開放是原則,不開放是例外”;最后論述了監(jiān)所開放的具體方式,我國監(jiān)所開放的具體方式應(yīng)當(dāng)包括巡視員制度、媒介采訪制度、親屬探訪制度、公眾參觀制度。
[Abstract]:To standardize the state power and guarantee civil rights is the eternal theme of law research , in order to realize the unity of fighting crime and protecting human rights , all the countries of the world have the power to limit and supervise the liberty of citizens and supervise them .

This paper consists of introduction , text and conclusion , the text is divided into four parts :

The first part is an overview of the opening of the monitor . Through the definition of the " monitor " , the origin and scope of the " monitor " studied in this paper are pointed out ; through the exposition of the open meaning of the monitor , the main elements of the opening of the monitor are explained , and it is pointed out that the opening of the monitor is a new system in our country , and the construction of the system requires its own efforts to explore , and it also needs to draw lessons from international rules and extraterritorial practices .

The second part , the necessity of the opening of the prison , includes four aspects : fulfilling the public obligation of the government information , guaranteeing the right of citizens to know the right , promoting the judicial fairness by the judicial openness , guaranteeing the human rights of the regulated personnel , and carrying out the governance of the prison , advancing the process of the law of the supervision and supervising the supervision of the supervision by guaranteeing the supervision of the civil rights and supervision of the State , and expanding the supervision of the social forces to the monitor .

In the third part , the assessment of the present situation of the opening of our country ' s prisons mainly includes the achievements and problems of the opening of our country ' s monitor . On the one hand , on the one hand , the relevant documents opened by our country ' s Ombudsman are more and more perfect . On the other hand , the practical experience of our country ' s monitor is richer . From the existing problems , the openness and depth of our country ' s prisons are not enough ; the openness of our monitor is relatively large .

The fourth part , the open system idea of our country ' s supervision , first elaborated the principle of openness of the supervision : must abide by the people ' s sovereignty , open in accordance with law , moderately open , step by step principle ; secondly , elaborated the open scope of the monitor , including the scope and the open scope , the determination of the scope follows " openness is the principle , not open is exception " ; finally , the concrete way of the opening of the monitor should include inspector system , media interview system , relative visit system and public visit system .
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926.7

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 潘祖宏;談在押人員合法權(quán)益的保障[J];公安學(xué)刊(浙江公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報);2000年01期

2 倪愛靜;;遏制刑訊逼供的新嘗試——吉林遼源羈押場所巡視制度試點概述[J];人民檢察;2008年23期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前7條

1 張淑云邋侯艷華;[N];北方法制報;2007年

2 徐海法邋楊宇;[N];檢察日報;2007年

3 中國人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院教授、博士生導(dǎo)師 陳衛(wèi)東;[N];檢察日報;2008年

4 中國政法大學(xué)教授、博士生導(dǎo)師 楊宇冠;[N];檢察日報;2009年

5 ;[N];人民公安報;2009年

6 記者 羅力生;[N];人民公安報;2010年

7 中央司法體制改革領(lǐng)導(dǎo)小組辦公室;[N];人民日報;2007年

，

本文編號：2117008