本文選題：法官回避制度 + 價值��； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：法官回避制度包括法官訴訟回避、法官任職回避和法官地區(qū)回避。法官回避制度的良好運行，可以將可能對案件審理產(chǎn)生偏私的法官排除出案件審理過程，從而對維護(hù)司法的公正性具有積極的作用。 但是，現(xiàn)行的法官回避制度并不完善，存在許多弊端，極大的制約了法官回避制度在司法實踐中作用的發(fā)揮。與此形成鮮明對比的是，法官回避制度并沒有引起學(xué)界和實務(wù)界的足夠重視，對此方面的研究僅僅限于“頭痛醫(yī)頭，腳痛醫(yī)腳”，研究不深入。鑒于法官回避制度在實踐中的現(xiàn)狀及其重要意義，為了更好的發(fā)揮該項制度應(yīng)有的功能，更好地維護(hù)司法的公正性，保障當(dāng)事人的權(quán)利，最高人民法院2011年頒布了《關(guān)于對配偶子女從事律師職業(yè)的法院領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部和審判執(zhí)行崗位法官實行任職回避的規(guī)定》（以下稱任職回避規(guī)定）。本文為了提出合理的法官回避制度的完善建議，著重對蘊含在法官回避制度背后的法官回避制度追求的價值進(jìn)行分析，，進(jìn)而在其價值的指引下，系統(tǒng)地完善我國的法官回避制度。 除了引言和結(jié)語外，本文一共分為以下四部分： 第一部分是對法官回避制度價值基本概念進(jìn)行界定。在本部分中，筆者將法官回避制度價值的概念予以分解，分別界定法官、回避、價值的概念，然后在對三個概念分析的基礎(chǔ)上提出對于法官回避制度價值的界定。所謂法官回避制度價值，指的是該項制度與人之間的一種需求和滿足關(guān)系，即法官回避制度對于主體需要的滿足。 第二部分主要對法官回避制度所具有的具體價值進(jìn)行分析。筆者在第一部分中，認(rèn)為價值的本質(zhì)就是一種需求和滿足關(guān)系，也就是客體對于主體需求的滿足。因此，不同主體在不同需求之下，具有不同的價值。據(jù)此筆者在闡述法官回避制度價值的時候，也從對抗雙方、法官、社會公眾三方的需求角度，分別分析法官回避制度對于不同主體所具有的價值。 第三部分是對中外法官回避制度發(fā)展歷史中所體現(xiàn)的價值追求的分析。隨著歷史的發(fā)展前進(jìn)，法官回避制度也隨之不斷的完善。但是，中外法官回避制度從不完善走向完善的過程并不是隨性的，也不是雜亂無章的，中外不同國家法官回避制度發(fā)展完善都是基于對一定價值的追求，都是在相關(guān)價值的指引下不斷糾正、不斷進(jìn)步。筆者在此部分中，就著重對中外法官回避制度在發(fā)展完善的過程中所體現(xiàn)的價值追求進(jìn)行闡述，試圖理順法官回避制度發(fā)展的價值指向。 第四部分主要闡述如何在法官回避制度價值的指引下，完善我國的法官回避制度。在本章中，筆者首先對我國關(guān)于該制度的立法現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行剖析，并且指出我國的法官回避制度存在的三個方面的主要問題，進(jìn)而在法官回避制度價值指引下，提出完善我國法官回避制度的建議。
[Abstract]:The system of disqualification includes the challenge of judge, the recusal of judge and the recusal of district. The good operation of the system of disqualification of judges can exclude the judges who may be biased to the trial of cases from the trial process and thus play a positive role in safeguarding the impartiality of the judiciary. However, the current system of disqualification of judges is not perfect, there are many drawbacks, which greatly restricts the role of the system in judicial practice. By contrast, the system of disqualification of judges has not attracted enough attention from the academic and practical circles. The research on this aspect is limited to "treating head pain, treating foot and foot", and the research is not thorough. In view of the present situation of the system of disqualification of judges in practice and its important significance, in order to give full play to the functions of the system, to safeguard the fairness of justice and the rights of the parties, In 2011, the Supreme people's Court promulgated the provisions on disqualification of judges and leading cadres of the court engaged in the profession of spouses and children as lawyers (hereinafter referred to as the provisions on disqualification). In order to put forward some suggestions for the perfection of the system of disqualification of judges, this paper focuses on the analysis of the value of the system of recusal of judges, which is contained in the system of recusal of judges, and then under the guidance of its value. Systematically improve the system of disqualification of judges in our country. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into the following four parts: the first part is to define the basic concept of the value of the system of withdrawal of judges. In this part, the author decomposes the concept of the value of the system of challenge of judges, defines the concepts of judge, challenge and value respectively, and then puts forward the definition of the value of the system of challenge of judges on the basis of the analysis of the three concepts. The value of the system of recusal of judges refers to the need and satisfaction relationship between the system and the people, that is to say, the system of challenge of judges satisfies the needs of the subject. The second part mainly analyzes the specific value of the system. In the first part, the author thinks that the essence of value is a kind of demand and satisfaction relation, that is, the object satisfies the subject demand. Therefore, different subjects have different values under different needs. On this basis, the author analyzes the value of the system for different subjects from the point of view of the needs of the parties, judges and the public. The third part is the analysis of the value pursuit reflected in the development history of Chinese and foreign judges' recusal system. With the development of history, the system of recusal of judges has been improved. However, the process of the Chinese and foreign judges' recusal system from imperfection to perfection is not random, nor is it random. The development and perfection of the system is based on the pursuit of certain value. Are under the guidance of the value of the continuous correction, continuous progress. In this part, the author emphatically expounds the value pursuit of the Chinese and foreign judges' recusal system in the process of development and perfection, and tries to straighten out the value direction of the development of the judges' recusal system. The fourth part mainly expounds how to perfect the system of disqualification of judges under the guidance of the value of the system of disqualification of judges. In this chapter, the author first analyzes the current legislative situation of this system in China, and points out the main problems in three aspects of the system, and then under the guidance of the value of the system, Some suggestions are put forward to perfect the system of disqualification of judges in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王學(xué)棟;建立我國法官地區(qū)回避制度的思考[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2000年06期

2 陳軼;;自然正義與正當(dāng)法律程序比較研究[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2006年S2期

3 程新生;論我國法官回避制度的完善[J];法律適用(國家法官學(xué)院學(xué)報);2001年03期

4 李玉成;;關(guān)于“司法廉潔”的幾點思考[J];中國監(jiān)察;2008年21期

5 王克千;價值是“第三世界”——關(guān)于價值理論若干問題的斷想[J];人文雜志;1988年05期

6 蒲菊花,黃文;訴訟經(jīng)濟(jì)原則探析[J];四川財政;2003年05期

7 易萍;李麗;;論民事訴訟回避對象的立法缺陷及完善[J];廣東商學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年04期

8 李龍;民事訴權(quán)論綱[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2003年02期

9 溫晉鋒,汪自成;我國司法回避的制度檢視[J];政法論壇;2004年06期

10 孫洪坤;王冠軍;;刑事回避制度的觀念更新與改革[J];中國刑事法雜志;2004年05期

本文編號：2116433