本文選題：裁判規(guī)范 + 法律解釋�。� 參考：《廣東商學(xué)院》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：裁判規(guī)范是在司法裁判過程中，法官通過結(jié)合具體案情和法律規(guī)范所形成的目的在于解決訴訟爭議而生成的個案規(guī)范。裁判規(guī)范是法官裁判案件解決糾紛的直接依據(jù)。法律規(guī)范與裁判規(guī)范不同，法律規(guī)范是裁判規(guī)范生成的基礎(chǔ)。在我國民事疑難案件中，可能存在法律規(guī)定模糊、法律存在漏洞或者法律相互沖突的情形。法官在面對這些情形時，需要運用法律解釋的方法、填補法律漏洞的方法等法律方法生成裁判規(guī)范。法官在運用法律方法生成裁判規(guī)范的過程可能會受到法官自身因素和利益因素的影響，，甚至在此過程中，因為法官法律感的缺失、裁判過程的硬化導(dǎo)致裁判規(guī)范生成的不正當(dāng)或者不合理。為了保證裁判規(guī)范生成的正當(dāng)性和合理性，本文認為首先要完善和提高法官的權(quán)限和素質(zhì)，其次對法官所生成的裁判規(guī)范進行必要的論證并完善我國案例指導(dǎo)制度，使裁判規(guī)范的生成在法律方法的運用上相對一致，避免生成的裁判規(guī)范差異較大，造成同案不同判的現(xiàn)象。
[Abstract]:In the process of judicial adjudication, the criterion of adjudication is a case norm which is formed by combining the specific case and the legal norm, the purpose of which is to resolve the dispute of litigation. The adjudication standard is the direct basis for the judge to resolve the dispute. Legal norms are different from adjudicative norms, and legal norms are the basis for the formation of adjudicative norms. In difficult civil cases in China, there may be vague legal provisions, loopholes or conflicting laws. In the face of these situations, judges need to use the legal interpretation method, the method of filling the legal loophole and other legal methods to produce the adjudication norm. The judge may be influenced by the judge's own factors and interests in the process of using the legal method to produce the adjudication norm, even in this process, because of the lack of the judge's sense of law. The hardening of the referee process leads to improper or unreasonable rules of adjudication. In order to ensure the legitimacy and rationality of the formation of the adjudicative norms, this paper holds that first of all, it is necessary to perfect and improve the jurisdiction and quality of the judges, and then to conduct the necessary argumentation on the judges' generated adjudicative norms and to perfect the guiding system of our country's cases. To make the formation of adjudicative norms relatively consistent in the application of legal methods, to avoid the formation of greater differences in the norms of adjudication, resulting in the phenomenon of different judgments in the same case.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東商學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D926.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉星;疑難案件中法律適用的理論與實踐[J];比較法研究;1994年Z1期

2 陳金釗;論審判規(guī)范[J];比較法研究;1999年Z1期

3 唐仲清;;從法律規(guī)范到裁判準(zhǔn)據(jù)[J];遼東學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年01期

4 胡志堅;;個案裁判規(guī)范之構(gòu)建是司法裁決證立的關(guān)鍵[J];法律方法與法律思維;2008年00期

5 侯學(xué)勇;;排除任意解釋的法律論證[J];法律方法;2004年00期

6 王宏選;;疑難案件及其法律發(fā)現(xiàn)[J];法律方法;2006年00期

7 趙耀彤;;論裁判規(guī)范[J];法律方法;2007年00期

8 游冰峰;;揭開法律解釋的面紗 芻議民商事審判中法律解釋的基本規(guī)則[J];法律適用;2006年03期

9 吳慶寶;;法官裁判的規(guī)范性——以民事法官裁判為視角[J];法律適用;2007年09期

10 沈宗靈;法律推理與法律適用[J];法學(xué);1988年05期

本文編號：2107577