本文選題：檢察委員會(huì) + 制度規(guī)范　； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：檢察委員會(huì)制度是我國檢察制度的一項(xiàng)創(chuàng)舉，是中國特色社會(huì)主義檢察制度的重要內(nèi)容。檢察委員會(huì)制度起源于1941年，它的發(fā)展經(jīng)歷了重大的變化，從最初由檢察長擔(dān)任委員會(huì)議主席，再到后來檢察長領(lǐng)導(dǎo)檢察委員會(huì)，進(jìn)一步發(fā)展到目前這檢察長主持檢察委員會(huì)，已經(jīng)成為極具中國特色的檢察機(jī)關(guān)決策機(jī)制。 在中央深化司法體制改革的要求下，，檢察委員會(huì)制度規(guī)范化建設(shè)不斷加強(qiáng)，統(tǒng)一規(guī)范的檢察委員會(huì)制度已經(jīng)基本形成。伴隨制度的不斷完善，一些困擾檢察委員會(huì)工作的問題得到解決，但實(shí)踐中又涌現(xiàn)出新的問題，檢察委員會(huì)制度的理論需要繼續(xù)深化拓展。 本文由六個(gè)部分組成。第一部分由歷史入手，介紹檢察委員會(huì)制度形成發(fā)展的歷史，并著重?cái)⑹鰴z察委員會(huì)現(xiàn)有規(guī)范化制度體系演進(jìn)變化發(fā)展的歷程。第二部分從檢察委員會(huì)是檢察機(jī)關(guān)的最高業(yè)務(wù)決策機(jī)構(gòu)，是民主集中制原則的于檢察權(quán)運(yùn)行中的具體體現(xiàn)，有利于規(guī)范檢察權(quán)的健康運(yùn)行，能夠加強(qiáng)內(nèi)部監(jiān)督保障司法公正的角度，論述檢察委員會(huì)制度的價(jià)值基礎(chǔ)。第三部分關(guān)于檢察委員會(huì)的基本組織結(jié)構(gòu)，論述檢察委員會(huì)人員組成，委員任職資格、任期、員額、辦事機(jī)構(gòu)情況，這些構(gòu)成檢察委員會(huì)制度的基本框架。第四部分實(shí)證分析在現(xiàn)有的檢察委員會(huì)制度和規(guī)范體系下，從議題提請，到會(huì)議審議和作出決定，再到?jīng)Q定的執(zhí)行，探討了檢察委員會(huì)議事決策的運(yùn)行過程。第五部分在前述分析的基礎(chǔ)上，探討了目前檢察委員會(huì)制度仍然存在的問題，諸如議題范圍不明確，議事效率不高，議而不決，對檢察長制約不足，檢察委員會(huì)委員自身能力建設(shè)不足，專職委員和檢察委員會(huì)辦事機(jī)構(gòu)定位不明確等。第六部分，在檢察委員會(huì)制度和規(guī)范體系方面，提出進(jìn)一步完善的舉措。全國四級(jí)檢察機(jī)關(guān)，具體的業(yè)務(wù)工作存在很大區(qū)別，不宜設(shè)定統(tǒng)一的指標(biāo)考察檢察委員會(huì)的實(shí)效。就如何明晰檢察委員會(huì)審議的議題范圍，提出一些個(gè)人的思考。此外，對已有的具體規(guī)范應(yīng)該進(jìn)一步細(xì)化，對議事程序也可以進(jìn)一步改革，在程序上需要制約檢察長的權(quán)力，要加強(qiáng)委員自身能力建設(shè)，還應(yīng)當(dāng)規(guī)范檢察委員會(huì)辦事機(jī)構(gòu)設(shè)置發(fā)揮其職能作用。
[Abstract]:The procuratorial committee system is an innovation of the procuratorial system of our country and an important content of the socialist procuratorial system with Chinese characteristics. The procuratorial committee system originated in 1941, and its development has undergone major changes. From the chief procurator as the chairman of the committee at first, to the procuratorial committee leading the procuratorial committee by the chief procurator later, to the procuratorial director presiding over the procuratorial committee at present, It has become a decision-making mechanism of procuratorial organs with Chinese characteristics. Under the request of the central government to deepen the reform of the judicial system, the standardization of the procuratorial committee system has been strengthened, and the unified and standardized procuratorial committee system has been basically formed. With the continuous improvement of the system, some problems puzzling the work of the procuratorial committee have been solved, but new problems have emerged in practice. The theory of the procuratorial committee system needs to continue to deepen and expand. This paper consists of six parts. The first part begins with history, introduces the history of the formation and development of procuratorial committee system, and emphatically narrates the course of evolution and development of the existing standardized system of procuratorial committee. The second part is that the procuratorial committee is the highest professional decision-making organ of the procuratorial organ and the concrete embodiment of the principle of democratic centralism in the operation of procuratorial power, which is conducive to standardizing the healthy operation of procuratorial power. This paper discusses the value basis of procuratorial committee system from the angle of strengthening internal supervision and safeguarding judicial justice. The third part deals with the basic organizational structure of the procuratorial committee, including the composition of the procuratorial committee, the qualifications of the procuratorial committee, the term of office, the posts, and the office of the procuratorial committee, which constitute the basic framework of the procuratorial committee system. The fourth part of the empirical analysis under the existing procuratorial committee system and normative system, from the subject to request, to the meeting review and decision, and then to the implementation of the decision, discussed the procuratorial committee of the operational process of decision-making. The fifth part, on the basis of the foregoing analysis, discusses the problems that still exist in the procuratorial committee system, such as the unclear scope of the topic, the inefficiency of the proceedings, the lack of discussion without decision, and the lack of restriction on the procuratorial director. The procuratorial committee member's own ability construction is insufficient, the full-time committee member and procuratorial committee's office position is not clear and so on. The sixth part, in the procuratorial committee system and the standard system, proposed the further consummation measure. The national four-level procuratorial organs have great differences in their specific work, so it is not appropriate to set a unified index to examine the effectiveness of the procuratorial committee. On how to clarify the scope of the issues considered by the procuratorial committee, put forward some personal thinking. In addition, the existing specific norms should be further refined, the procedure of the proceedings may also be further reformed, the powers of the Procurator General should be restricted in the procedure, and the capacity-building of the members themselves should be strengthened. We should also standardize the establishment of procuratorial committee offices and give play to their functions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D926.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 樂紹光;周彬彬;;檢察委員會(huì)受案范圍與檢察機(jī)關(guān)內(nèi)部監(jiān)督[J];法治研究;2011年11期

2 謝小劍;;檢察委員會(huì)決策方式改革的歷史維度[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年04期

3 劉昌強(qiáng);;強(qiáng)化檢察委員會(huì)司法屬性之路徑探析[J];河北法學(xué);2011年11期

4 歐陽湘;;中國共產(chǎn)黨領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的抗日根據(jù)地援用國民政府法律問題論析[J];抗日戰(zhàn)爭研究;2009年03期

5 謝曉歌;;檢察委員會(huì)制度的特點(diǎn)及其改革發(fā)展思考[J];人民檢察;2008年08期

6 張曉元;;檢察委員會(huì)的基本職能與作用研究[J];人民檢察;2010年07期

7 鄧思清;;再論我國檢察委員會(huì)制度改革[J];人民檢察;2010年11期

8 鞏富文;張宏德;閆黨路;;檢察委員會(huì)科學(xué)決策之我見[J];人民檢察;2011年24期

9 曾軍;師亮亮;;地方政法委協(xié)調(diào)處理刑事案件的制度考察及分析[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

10 張興波;;關(guān)于完善檢察委員會(huì)制度的思考[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2009年03期

本文編號(hào)：2106701