本文選題：審判公開 + 信息化�。� 參考：《寧波大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：審判公開作為現(xiàn)代審判制度的基本理念，是對審判權(quán)運行進行民主監(jiān)督的一種制度安排，其核心是把審判活動置于陽光之下，讓司法裁判經(jīng)得起推敲、經(jīng)得起檢驗、經(jīng)得起評判，以公開促公正，以公正促公信，達到良性循環(huán)。在信息化浪潮的沖刷之下，，傳統(tǒng)的審判公開制度正呈現(xiàn)出新的形態(tài)，煥發(fā)著勃勃生機。通過信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)實現(xiàn)審判公開，是實現(xiàn)司法公正、提升司法公信力的客觀要求，也是信息化時代背景下社會公眾了解、參與、監(jiān)督司法的現(xiàn)實需要。在當前這樣一個信息化時代研究審判公開意義非凡。 本文將從以下四個方面對信息化條件下的審判公開進行研究： 第一部分為審判公開的基本內(nèi)涵探析，擬解決審判公開的兩個理論問題，即厘清審判公開的概念和探究審判公開的實質(zhì)內(nèi)涵，為下文分析問題、提出對策奠定堅實的理論基礎(chǔ)。 第二部著重考察了旁聽、庭審的直播與錄播、裁判文書的公開這三種傳統(tǒng)審判公開方式，并從整體上梳理了傳統(tǒng)審判公開存在的局限性。 第三部分具體分析了信息化條件對審判公開產(chǎn)生的影響以及當前審判公開制度發(fā)展所面臨的挑戰(zhàn)與問題。 第四部分針對當前信息化條件下審判公開制度發(fā)展所面臨的問題，提出創(chuàng)設(shè)審判公開的網(wǎng)絡(luò)新載體、搭建審判流程公開平臺、排除裁判文書上網(wǎng)的恣意空間以及建立審判公開的救濟程序這四點完善建議。
[Abstract]:As the basic concept of the modern trial system, trial openness is a kind of system arrangement for democratic supervision of the operation of judicial power. Its core is to put the trial activities under the sun, so that the judicial judgment can withstand scrutiny and test. Stand judgment, open to promote justice, justice to promote public trust, to achieve a virtuous circle. Under the tide of information technology, the traditional open trial system is showing a new form and full of vitality. Public trial through information network is the objective requirement to realize judicial justice and enhance judicial credibility. It is also the realistic need for the public to understand participate and supervise the administration of justice under the background of information age. It is of great significance to study trial openness in such an information age. This article will carry on the research from the following four aspects to the trial open under the information condition: the first part is the basic connotation analysis of the trial publicity, intends to solve two theory questions of the trial open. That is to clarify the concept of open trial and explore the essential connotation of open trial, and lay a solid theoretical foundation for the following analysis and countermeasures. The second part focuses on the three traditional ways of open trial, such as overhearing, direct broadcast and recording of court hearings, and the opening of judgment documents, and combs the limitations of the opening of traditional trials as a whole. The third part analyzes the influence of informatization conditions on trial openness and the challenges and problems faced by the development of open trial system. In the fourth part, aiming at the problems faced by the development of open trial system under the current information condition, the author proposes to create a new network carrier of open trial, and to set up the open platform of trial process. The four perfect suggestions are to exclude the wanton space of the judgment documents and to establish the public trial relief procedure.
【學位授予單位】：寧波大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D926.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王福華;民事審判公開制度的雙重含義[J];當代法學;1999年02期

2 韓紅俊;民事公開審判[J];當代法學;2002年07期

3 張莉;;中國司法公開制度的發(fā)展[J];中國司法;2011年09期

4 張志銘;司法判決的結(jié)構(gòu)和風格——對域外實踐的比較研究[J];法學;1998年10期

5 胡夏冰;;裁判文書上網(wǎng)難點及對策[J];法制資訊;2009年07期

6 高一飛;賀紅強;;庭審旁聽權(quán)及其實現(xiàn)機制[J];社會科學研究;2013年01期

7 張晉紅;審判公開思想與修訂《民事訴訟法》的幾個基本關(guān)系定位[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2005年04期

8 賀衛(wèi)方;對電視直播庭審過程的異議[J];中國律師;1998年09期

9 崔英楠,劉風景;公開審判制度的理論與實踐[J];中國社會科學院研究生院學報;2003年03期

10 趙琦;;刑事審判公開實施效果實證研究——基于傳統(tǒng)與信息化兩個途徑的考察[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2012年04期

本文編號：2099837