本文選題：檢察機(jī)關(guān) + 量刑建議�。� 參考：《沈陽(yáng)師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：量刑建議制度自試行以來(lái)，就廣受社會(huì)各界，特別是法律界人士的關(guān)注。筆者以我國(guó)檢察機(jī)關(guān)量刑建議制度為題，系統(tǒng)論述了該制度各方面的問(wèn)題。 在文中，筆者首先簡(jiǎn)要介紹了我國(guó)檢察機(jī)關(guān)量刑建議制度的發(fā)展歷程，以此引出下文的具體論述。在正文中，筆者從以下三個(gè)部分進(jìn)行了論述。 第一部分，量刑建議制度概述。這一部分對(duì)量刑建議的概念、特征、其存在的理論依據(jù)和法律根據(jù)進(jìn)行了論證，并著重論述了量刑建議制度在對(duì)提高我國(guó)刑事司法的公正性和公信力，增強(qiáng)檢察機(jī)關(guān)的法律監(jiān)督能力、提高訴訟效率方面的作用。隨后，對(duì)量刑建議的操作原則和效力進(jìn)行了闡述，我國(guó)檢察機(jī)關(guān)的量刑建議原則包括依法量刑、罪責(zé)刑相適應(yīng)、寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)和均衡四個(gè)方面，，量刑建議的效力包括啟動(dòng)量刑程序、制約量刑裁判和預(yù)設(shè)監(jiān)督標(biāo)尺三個(gè)方面。在域外量刑建議制度方面，文中對(duì)法、德、英、美四個(gè)國(guó)家的相關(guān)制度進(jìn)行了考察，并對(duì)積極經(jīng)驗(yàn)進(jìn)行了總結(jié)。 第二方面，是對(duì)我國(guó)量刑建議的實(shí)證分析，筆者首先立足法律規(guī)范對(duì)量刑建議的具體操作方法和程序進(jìn)行了闡述，并結(jié)合實(shí)踐案例對(duì)量刑起點(diǎn)的確定、基準(zhǔn)刑的分析、建議幅度的比對(duì)及實(shí)施主體、提出方式與時(shí)機(jī)幾個(gè)方面詳細(xì)加以說(shuō)明分析，爾后提出了諸如重視程度不夠、量刑建議提出方式不規(guī)范、量刑情節(jié)事實(shí)調(diào)查取證不全面、沒(méi)有明確的證據(jù)開(kāi)示制度、建議內(nèi)容缺乏應(yīng)有保障、未建立特別量刑建議制度等問(wèn)題，以引出下文對(duì)量刑建議制度的完善。 第三部分是本論文正文的最后部分，主要針對(duì)前一部分對(duì)我國(guó)量刑建議制度的不足所做的完善建議。首先，提出了完善量刑建議運(yùn)行模式，包括提高重要性認(rèn)識(shí)和執(zhí)行力度、規(guī)范提出方式和全面考察量刑情節(jié)；其次，提出了明確量刑建議證據(jù)開(kāi)示制度，著重提出明確量刑證據(jù)開(kāi)示的雙向性義務(wù)、證據(jù)開(kāi)示范圍和開(kāi)示程序；最后，針對(duì)量刑建議缺乏保障的實(shí)際情況，提出建立量刑建議保障制度，并秉著特殊問(wèn)題特殊處理的原則，提出建立輕微刑事案件和未成年人刑事案件特別量刑建議制度的建議。
[Abstract]:Since the trial, the system of sentencing proposal has been paid much attention to by all walks of life, especially in the law circles. The author systematically discusses the problems in all aspects of the system of our country's procuratorial organs.
In this article, the author first briefly introduces the development process of the system of sentencing proposal in China's procuratorial organs, which leads to the specific discussion of the following. In the text, the author has discussed from the following three parts.
The first part is a summary of the system of sentencing proposal. This part has demonstrated the concept, characteristics, the theoretical basis and the legal basis of the sentencing proposal, and emphatically expounds the role of the sentencing suggestion system in improving the fairness and credibility of the criminal justice of our country, strengthening the legal supervision ability of the procuratorial machine and improving the efficiency of the lawsuit. Then, the principle and effect of the sentencing proposal are expounded. The principle of sentencing proposal in China's procuratorial organs includes four aspects: sentencing, crime, punishment, leniency and balance. The effectiveness of the sentencing proposal includes three aspects: starting the sentencing procedure, restricting the sentencing referee and the presupposition supervision scale. On the other hand, the relevant systems of four countries, France, Germany, Britain and the United States, were reviewed and positive experiences were summarized.
The second aspect is the empirical analysis of the sentencing proposal in China. First, the author expounds the specific operation methods and procedures of the sentencing proposal based on the legal norms, and combines the practice cases to determine the starting point of the sentencing, the analysis of the benchmark penalty, the comparison of the scope and the implementation subject, and the way and the time to explain in detail. After the analysis, we put forward the following problems, such as insufficient attention, non standard sentencing proposal, no comprehensive evidence for sentencing, no clear evidence system, lack of due guarantee and no special sentencing suggestion system, in order to lead to the improvement of the system of sentencing proposal in the next article.
The third part is the last part of the text of this paper, which is mainly aimed at the improvement of the deficiency of our country's sentencing suggestion system. First, it puts forward the operation mode of perfecting the sentencing proposal, including the improvement of the importance and implementation, the standard method and the comprehensive investigation of the sentencing circumstances; secondly, it puts forward a clear sentence for the construction of sentencing. On the basis of the introduction of the evidence system, we put forward the two-way obligation, the scope of evidence and the procedure of opening the evidence, and finally, in view of the actual situation of the lack of guarantee for the sentencing proposal, the establishment of a guarantee system for the sentencing proposal and the principle of special handling of special problems, and the establishment of minor criminal cases and minor criminal cases are put forward. Recommendations of the special sentencing proposal system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽(yáng)師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D924.13;D926.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬樂(lè)明;;對(duì)檢察機(jī)關(guān)量刑建議制度之反思與重構(gòu)[J];河南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

2 劉怡;;對(duì)建立檢察官量刑建議制度的思考[J];商業(yè)文化(上半月);2011年05期

3 張忠秋;;論賦予檢察機(jī)關(guān)量刑建議權(quán)的合理性[J];遼寧公安司法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年04期

4 李迎春;陳雪文;;關(guān)于推行辯訴協(xié)商的思考[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬刊);2008年08期

5 李和仁;王軍;宋英輝;李樂(lè)平;李鐘;張敬博;孟澍菲;;量刑納入庭審程序后檢察機(jī)關(guān)如何推行量刑建議制度[J];人民檢察;2009年17期

6 原軍;許曉蕊;;試論量刑建議制度的合理構(gòu)建[J];人大建設(shè);2011年08期

7 吳U

本文編號(hào)：2073875