本文選題：刑事 + 指導(dǎo)案例�。� 參考：《西南大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：在我國大陸刑事司法實(shí)務(wù)中,基于刑事成文法的固有特點(diǎn)和弱點(diǎn),刑法規(guī)范具有模糊性、多解性,也存在空白區(qū)域,規(guī)范與事實(shí)之間并不完全、清楚、準(zhǔn)確且逐一地相互對(duì)應(yīng),刑法規(guī)范與具體案件的事實(shí)認(rèn)定和法律適用之間存在差異、沖突、無據(jù)和多選等情形,致使案件難以裁判或裁判不準(zhǔn),刑事司法活動(dòng)低效或無效。通過吸取判例法的經(jīng)驗(yàn),建立案例指導(dǎo)制度,在一定程度上解決刑事成文規(guī)范在個(gè)案中具體適用的難題,成為我國大陸刑事司法改革中的一項(xiàng)重要內(nèi)容。近年來,最高人民法院積極建設(shè)和推行案例指導(dǎo)制度,對(duì)指導(dǎo)案例的選擇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、確定程序、發(fā)布方式等都作出了規(guī)定。但是,關(guān)于刑事指導(dǎo)案例的確立、運(yùn)用等理論和實(shí)務(wù)問題并沒有得到深入討論。本文主要就刑事指導(dǎo)案例的確立進(jìn)行論證,使刑事指導(dǎo)案例的形成和確定過程符合案例指導(dǎo)制度構(gòu)建的初衷。 本文以刑事指導(dǎo)案例確立原則為起點(diǎn)論述,將刑事指導(dǎo)案例確立程序與其他刑事法律規(guī)則制定程序進(jìn)行了界分,從而對(duì)刑事指導(dǎo)案例確立程序進(jìn)行定位。在此基礎(chǔ)之上,對(duì)刑事指導(dǎo)案例確立的主體、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、體例、程序等具體環(huán)節(jié)進(jìn)行了分析。將確立方式分為內(nèi)部選擇方式與外部選擇方式兩種方式,并對(duì)兩種選擇方式的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了比較,旨在把兩種方式貫穿于幾個(gè)具體環(huán)節(jié)之中,進(jìn)而論證我國刑事指導(dǎo)案例的具體確立路徑。最后,對(duì)影響刑事指導(dǎo)案例確立的幾方面因素進(jìn)行探討,提出了相關(guān)的確立保障措施。
[Abstract]:In the practice of criminal justice in mainland China, based on the inherent characteristics and weaknesses of criminal statute law, criminal law norms are fuzzy, multi-resolution, there are also blank areas, norms and facts are not complete, clear, accurate and one by one corresponding to each other. There are differences between the criminal law norms and the fact determination and application of the law in specific cases, such as conflict, unsubstantiated and multi-selection, which result in the cases being difficult to judge or not correct, and the criminal judicial activities are inefficient or invalid. By drawing on the experience of case law and establishing the case guidance system, it is an important content in the criminal judicial reform of mainland China to solve the problem of the concrete application of the criminal written norms in the case to a certain extent. In recent years, the Supreme people's Court has actively constructed and implemented the case guidance system, and has made provisions on the selection criteria, the determination of procedures, and the way of issuing the guiding cases. However, the establishment and application of criminal guidance cases and other theoretical and practical issues have not been discussed in depth. This paper mainly demonstrates the establishment of criminal guidance cases, so that the formation and determination of criminal guidance cases accord with the original intention of case guidance system construction. Taking the principle of establishing criminal guidance case as the starting point, this paper divides the procedure of establishing criminal guidance case from that of other rules of criminal law, thus positioning the procedure of establishing criminal guidance case. On this basis, the main body, standard, style and procedure of criminal guidance case are analyzed. The established mode is divided into internal and external selection, and the advantages and disadvantages of the two choices are compared in order to run through the two ways in several specific links. And then prove the concrete establishment path of our country criminal guidance case. Finally, several factors affecting the establishment of criminal guidance cases are discussed, and relevant measures are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D924;D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 后藤武秀;判例在日本法律近代化中的作用[J];比較法研究;1997年01期

2 周偉;;通過案例解釋法律:最高人民法院案例指導(dǎo)制度的發(fā)展[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2009年02期

3 夏錦文;莫良元;;司法轉(zhuǎn)型中指導(dǎo)性案例的生成機(jī)理[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2010年04期

4 魏勝強(qiáng);;為判例制度正名——關(guān)于構(gòu)建我國判例制度的思考[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2011年03期

5 劉風(fēng)景;;裁判摘要的原理與制作——以《最高人民法院公報(bào)》公布案例為素材[J];法律方法;2009年00期

6 李友根;;論案例研究的類型與視角[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年06期

7 舒洪水;;建立我國案例指導(dǎo)制度的困境和出路——以刑事案例為例[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年01期

8 干朝端;建立以判例為主要形式的司法解釋體制[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2001年03期

9 陳興良;;案例指導(dǎo)制度的規(guī)范考察[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2012年03期

10 蔣集躍,楊永華;司法解釋的缺陷及其補(bǔ)救——兼談中國式判例制度的建構(gòu)[J];法學(xué);2003年10期

，

本文編號(hào)：2073771