本文選題：案例 + 引導(dǎo)　； 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：作為當(dāng)代中國多元化糾紛解決的方式之一，人民調(diào)解的地位是不容忽視的，不同于司法調(diào)解和行政調(diào)解，，人民調(diào)解有其特有的屬性。新時(shí)期下的人民調(diào)解與法制的高度融合，決定了當(dāng)前通過人民調(diào)解技巧的優(yōu)化來實(shí)現(xiàn)人民調(diào)解制度的完善非常有必要的。人民調(diào)解的技巧是多元的，包括“面對(duì)面”法、“背靠背”法、冷卻法、換位思考法、案例調(diào)解法等，其中案例調(diào)解法的運(yùn)用在實(shí)踐中非常普遍。不僅主管部門在對(duì)調(diào)解員進(jìn)行培訓(xùn)時(shí)使用案例教學(xué)，而且調(diào)解員在調(diào)解過程中也會(huì)直接或間接的運(yùn)用某些具體的案例來促成調(diào)解。案例傳遞的是一種法律思維，是針對(duì)具體問題提出的解決方案，比法律規(guī)定更為細(xì)致，操作性也更強(qiáng)。案例產(chǎn)生的效果會(huì)因人而異，一方面是因?yàn)槿嗣裾{(diào)解員自身的素質(zhì)，另一方面是因?yàn)楫?dāng)事人的心理反應(yīng)程度的區(qū)別，這些都在一定程度上影響了案例運(yùn)用的效果。 本文將從四個(gè)方面來探討人民調(diào)解中的案例運(yùn)用。第一章介紹人民調(diào)解中案例運(yùn)用的基本情況，包括概念與特征的介紹、與近似概念的比較，從而界定出本文所探討的案例的范圍和效力。第二章從法學(xué)和心理學(xué)角度，分析案例在人民調(diào)解中的作用原理及其功能和價(jià)值。第三章采用實(shí)證分析法，通過數(shù)據(jù)和文本資料對(duì)案例運(yùn)用的現(xiàn)狀、原因進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)梳理，重點(diǎn)指出案例收集困難、認(rèn)識(shí)程度不夠、運(yùn)用主體水平的局限、隱私保護(hù)不到位等幾個(gè)方面存在的問題。第四章在前一章所得結(jié)論的基礎(chǔ)上，針對(duì)實(shí)踐中存在的不足，提出案例運(yùn)用的完善性建議，以促成人民調(diào)解的法制化、公平性以及高效性。這些完善性建議包括以縣為單位建立分散性案例庫，如何對(duì)案例進(jìn)行分類以及如何運(yùn)用案例。
[Abstract]:As one of the diversified dispute resolution methods in contemporary China, the status of people mediation is not to be ignored, different from judicial mediation and administrative mediation, people mediation has its unique attributes. The high fusion of people's mediation and legal system in the new period determines that it is necessary to perfect the people's mediation system through the optimization of people's mediation techniques. The techniques of people's mediation are diverse, including "face to face" method, "back-to-back" method, cooling method, transposition thinking method, case mediation method and so on, among which the application of case mediation law is very common in practice. Not only the competent authorities use case teaching in training mediators, but also mediators use some specific cases directly or indirectly to facilitate mediation. The case is a kind of legal thinking, which is a solution to specific problems, more detailed than the legal provisions, more operational. The effect of the case will vary from person to person, on the one hand because of the quality of the people's mediator, on the other hand, because of the difference in the degree of psychological reaction of the parties, which to a certain extent affect the effect of the application of the case. This paper will discuss the application of cases in people's mediation from four aspects. The first chapter introduces the basic situation of the case application in the people's mediation, including the introduction of the concept and characteristics, and the comparison with the approximate concept, so as to define the scope and effectiveness of the cases discussed in this paper. The second chapter analyzes the principle, function and value of cases in people's mediation from the angle of law and psychology. The third chapter uses the empirical analysis method, through the data and the text data to use the present situation of the case, the reason carries on the systematic combing, emphatically points out the case collection difficulty, the understanding degree is insufficient, uses the main body level limitation, Privacy protection is not in place and other aspects of the problems. On the basis of the conclusions obtained in the previous chapter, the fourth chapter puts forward some suggestions on the perfection of the case application in order to promote the legalization, fairness and efficiency of the people's mediation. These suggestions include how to establish a decentralized case bank, how to classify cases and how to use them.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 肖建華;唐玉富;;論法院調(diào)解保密原則[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2011年04期

2 秦旺;;論我國案例指導(dǎo)制度的構(gòu)建和適用方法——以《最高人民法院公報(bào)》為分析樣本[J];法律方法與法律思維;2007年00期

3 沈解平,黃再再,金權(quán);從案例→到判例——論最高人民法院發(fā)布案例之判例化改造[J];法律適用;2003年09期

4 胡田野;;論案例教學(xué)在我國法官培訓(xùn)中的適用[J];法律適用;2012年05期

5 干朝端;建立以判例為主要形式的司法解釋體制[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2001年03期

6 蔣集躍,楊永華;司法解釋的缺陷及其補(bǔ)救——兼談中國式判例制度的建構(gòu)[J];法學(xué);2003年10期

7 丁文嚴(yán);;案例指導(dǎo)制度背景下人民法院案例系統(tǒng)的構(gòu)建[J];法律適用;2013年01期

8 徐勝萍;;人民調(diào)解發(fā)展的新特點(diǎn)[J];湖南師范大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年05期

9 杜鵑,陳玲,徐愛榮;在案例教學(xué)法中要重視案例庫建設(shè)[J];上海金融學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

10 賀雪峰;;農(nóng)民行動(dòng)邏輯與鄉(xiāng)村治理的區(qū)域差異[J];開放時(shí)代;2007年01期

本文編號(hào)：2067708