本文選題：糾紛解決機(jī)制 + 司法行政　； 參考：《北方工業(yè)大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文是以一次題為社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型下基層糾紛解決機(jī)制研究的社會(huì)調(diào)研為起點(diǎn)的,調(diào)研的目的是發(fā)現(xiàn)社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型中有效運(yùn)作的基層糾紛解決機(jī)制,并對其運(yùn)作模式及優(yōu)劣得失分析研究,將經(jīng)驗(yàn)歸納總結(jié)，以期在更廣泛的范圍復(fù)制推廣,為基層糾紛解決尋找出路,為構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì)建言獻(xiàn)策。 此次調(diào)研最初是在位于中國西部的甘肅省榆中縣開始的,從基層糾紛解決可能涉及的縣級政府部門、鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)人民政府、居民／村民自治組織展開調(diào)研。在調(diào)研的過程中,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)了一個(gè)重要的角色,在基層糾紛解決中幾乎無處不在,作為政府公權(quán)力部門的神經(jīng)末梢處在基層糾紛解決的第一線,在基層糾紛解決中發(fā)揮著巨大的作用。它就是鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)司法所——縣區(qū)一級司法行政機(jī)關(guān)在鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)的派出機(jī)構(gòu)。 司法所就是此次調(diào)研觀察到,現(xiàn)實(shí)中正在并將在一定時(shí)期內(nèi)繼續(xù)有效運(yùn)作的基層糾紛解決機(jī)制。有了這樣一個(gè)明確的目標(biāo),我們的進(jìn)一步調(diào)研就更加具有針對性了,接下來就是對司法所進(jìn)行更細(xì)致、持續(xù)的觀察。對司法所的觀察經(jīng)歷了兩個(gè)階段,第一階段是在甘肅省榆中縣和臨洮縣的實(shí)地調(diào)研,即通過搜集糾紛處理的案卷材料、統(tǒng)計(jì)數(shù)據(jù),對當(dāng)事人進(jìn)行訪談并記錄等形式對選定相對比較具有社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型代表性的鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)司法所進(jìn)行實(shí)地調(diào)研；第二階段是文獻(xiàn)調(diào)研,即搜集整理與司法所相關(guān),包括公文、報(bào)道、論文在內(nèi)的各種文獻(xiàn)資料,并進(jìn)行分析。通過以上兩個(gè)階段的調(diào)研,對司法所的基本情況及現(xiàn)實(shí)運(yùn)作有了比較充分的認(rèn)識和把握。 本文采用調(diào)研報(bào)告的形式,力求比較完整、真實(shí)地展示此次調(diào)研的過程及成果。調(diào)研報(bào)告由五大部分組成,一是調(diào)研項(xiàng)目簡介,簡要介紹了調(diào)研的名稱、對象、目的、時(shí)間。二是調(diào)研方法說明,介紹了調(diào)研的定位、調(diào)研的方法以及調(diào)研的具體實(shí)施步驟及措施。第三部分是調(diào)研準(zhǔn)備階段和調(diào)研計(jì)劃的制定,比較詳盡的記錄了調(diào)研計(jì)劃的制定以及其它前期調(diào)研準(zhǔn)備工作。第四部分是調(diào)研行程和數(shù)據(jù)匯總,將整個(gè)實(shí)地調(diào)研過程和調(diào)研所得的數(shù)據(jù)做了簡單的整理和匯總展示。第三、四兩部分主要是針對實(shí)地調(diào)研部分的,文獻(xiàn)調(diào)研過程相對單一,沒有細(xì)分準(zhǔn)備階段和實(shí)施階段。第五部分是調(diào)研結(jié)果,從司法所概況、司法所職能、司法所建設(shè)、司法所調(diào)解與人民調(diào)解的關(guān)系、司法所發(fā)展面臨的問題五個(gè)方面描述了對司法所的觀察和對一些重要問題的思考。
[Abstract]:This paper is based on a social research on the grass-roots dispute resolution mechanism under the social transformation. The purpose of the investigation is to find out the effective grass-roots dispute resolution mechanism in the social transformation, and to analyze its operation mode, advantages and disadvantages. To sum up the experience in order to replicate and popularize in a wider range, to find a way out for the grass-roots dispute resolution, and to make suggestions for the construction of a harmonious society. The survey, which began in Yuzhong County, Gansu Province, in western China, began with grass-roots dispute resolution involving county government departments, township people's governments, and residents / villagers' autonomous organizations. In the course of investigation, we have found an important role, almost everywhere in the grass-roots dispute resolution, as the nerve endings of the public power department of the government are at the forefront of the grass-roots dispute resolution. In the grass-roots dispute resolution plays a huge role. It is the township judicial-county-level judicial administration in the township agency. The Institute of Justice observed that the grassroots dispute resolution mechanism is and will continue to operate effectively in a certain period of time. With such a clear goal, our further research will be more targeted, followed by a more detailed and continuous observation of the judiciary. The observation of the judicial institute has gone through two stages. The first stage is the field investigation in Yuzhong County and Lintao County, Gansu Province, that is, through collecting file materials for dispute resolution, statistical data are collected. In the form of interviews and records of the litigants, the field investigation of the township judicial institutes that are relatively representative of social transformation is carried out; the second stage is literature research, that is, collecting and collating relevant documents to judicial institutions, including official documents and reports. The paper includes all kinds of documents and materials, and carries on the analysis. Through the investigation of the above two stages, the basic situation and practical operation of the judicial institute have been fully understood and grasped. In this paper, the form of research report, strive to be more complete, true display of the process and results of the survey. The research report is composed of five parts. The first is the brief introduction of the research project, which briefly introduces the name, object, purpose and time of the investigation. The second is the description of the research methods, the orientation of the investigation, the research methods and the specific steps and measures of the investigation. The third part is the research preparation stage and the research plan formulation, more detailed records the research plan formulation as well as other preliminary research preparation work. The fourth part is the research itinerary and the data summary, the whole field research process and the survey data has made the simple arrangement and the summary display. Third, the fourth part is mainly aimed at the field investigation part, the literature research process is relatively single, does not subdivide the preparation stage and the implementation stage. The fifth part is the results of the investigation, from the general situation of the judicial institute, the function of the judicial institute, the construction of the judicial institute, the relationship between the judicial institution mediation and the people's mediation, The problems facing the development of the judicial institute are described in five aspects, including the observation of the judicial institute and the consideration of some important problems.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北方工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 張勤;李楓;徐輝;蘇潔瓊;衛(wèi)琳;;創(chuàng)新我國城鄉(xiāng)協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展體制的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];城市規(guī)劃;2006年01期

2 王子正;論司法行政及其改革[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年12期

3 張金才;;新時(shí)期我國法制建設(shè)的歷史進(jìn)程與基本經(jīng)驗(yàn)[J];當(dāng)代中國史研究;2006年02期

4 韋書覺;;方法與問題——以農(nóng)村民事糾紛的分析為例[J];河池學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年06期

5 宋華琳;英國的行政裁判所制度[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

6 肖富群;居民社區(qū)參與的動(dòng)力機(jī)制分析[J];廣西社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年05期

7 吳思紅;;鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)體制改革與管理模式創(chuàng)新[J];中共杭州市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 曹怡;論我國社區(qū)矯正制度的建立和完善[D];對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2006年

2 朱紅萱;鄉(xiāng)土社會(huì)人民調(diào)解的組織與自組織[D];華中師范大學(xué);2007年

3 單德申;我國城市基層群眾性自治組織自治性研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2007年

4 廖清平;城市社區(qū)自治機(jī)構(gòu)建設(shè)研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年

5 潘爽;上海城區(qū)的社區(qū)自治研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：2061555