本文選題：糾紛解決機制 + 司法行政��； 參考：《北方工業(yè)大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文是以一次題為社會轉型下基層糾紛解決機制研究的社會調研為起點的,調研的目的是發(fā)現(xiàn)社會轉型中有效運作的基層糾紛解決機制,并對其運作模式及優(yōu)劣得失分析研究,將經(jīng)驗歸納總結，以期在更廣泛的范圍復制推廣,為基層糾紛解決尋找出路,為構建和諧社會建言獻策。 此次調研最初是在位于中國西部的甘肅省榆中縣開始的,從基層糾紛解決可能涉及的縣級政府部門、鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)人民政府、居民／村民自治組織展開調研。在調研的過程中,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)了一個重要的角色,在基層糾紛解決中幾乎無處不在,作為政府公權力部門的神經(jīng)末梢處在基層糾紛解決的第一線,在基層糾紛解決中發(fā)揮著巨大的作用。它就是鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)司法所——縣區(qū)一級司法行政機關在鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)的派出機構。 司法所就是此次調研觀察到,現(xiàn)實中正在并將在一定時期內(nèi)繼續(xù)有效運作的基層糾紛解決機制。有了這樣一個明確的目標,我們的進一步調研就更加具有針對性了,接下來就是對司法所進行更細致、持續(xù)的觀察。對司法所的觀察經(jīng)歷了兩個階段,第一階段是在甘肅省榆中縣和臨洮縣的實地調研,即通過搜集糾紛處理的案卷材料、統(tǒng)計數(shù)據(jù),對當事人進行訪談并記錄等形式對選定相對比較具有社會轉型代表性的鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)司法所進行實地調研；第二階段是文獻調研,即搜集整理與司法所相關,包括公文、報道、論文在內(nèi)的各種文獻資料,并進行分析。通過以上兩個階段的調研,對司法所的基本情況及現(xiàn)實運作有了比較充分的認識和把握。 本文采用調研報告的形式,力求比較完整、真實地展示此次調研的過程及成果。調研報告由五大部分組成,一是調研項目簡介,簡要介紹了調研的名稱、對象、目的、時間。二是調研方法說明,介紹了調研的定位、調研的方法以及調研的具體實施步驟及措施。第三部分是調研準備階段和調研計劃的制定,比較詳盡的記錄了調研計劃的制定以及其它前期調研準備工作。第四部分是調研行程和數(shù)據(jù)匯總,將整個實地調研過程和調研所得的數(shù)據(jù)做了簡單的整理和匯總展示。第三、四兩部分主要是針對實地調研部分的,文獻調研過程相對單一,沒有細分準備階段和實施階段。第五部分是調研結果,從司法所概況、司法所職能、司法所建設、司法所調解與人民調解的關系、司法所發(fā)展面臨的問題五個方面描述了對司法所的觀察和對一些重要問題的思考。
[Abstract]:This paper is based on a social research on the grass-roots dispute resolution mechanism under the social transformation. The purpose of the investigation is to find out the effective grass-roots dispute resolution mechanism in the social transformation, and to analyze its operation mode, advantages and disadvantages. To sum up the experience in order to replicate and popularize in a wider range, to find a way out for the grass-roots dispute resolution, and to make suggestions for the construction of a harmonious society. The survey, which began in Yuzhong County, Gansu Province, in western China, began with grass-roots dispute resolution involving county government departments, township people's governments, and residents / villagers' autonomous organizations. In the course of investigation, we have found an important role, almost everywhere in the grass-roots dispute resolution, as the nerve endings of the public power department of the government are at the forefront of the grass-roots dispute resolution. In the grass-roots dispute resolution plays a huge role. It is the township judicial-county-level judicial administration in the township agency. The Institute of Justice observed that the grassroots dispute resolution mechanism is and will continue to operate effectively in a certain period of time. With such a clear goal, our further research will be more targeted, followed by a more detailed and continuous observation of the judiciary. The observation of the judicial institute has gone through two stages. The first stage is the field investigation in Yuzhong County and Lintao County, Gansu Province, that is, through collecting file materials for dispute resolution, statistical data are collected. In the form of interviews and records of the litigants, the field investigation of the township judicial institutes that are relatively representative of social transformation is carried out; the second stage is literature research, that is, collecting and collating relevant documents to judicial institutions, including official documents and reports. The paper includes all kinds of documents and materials, and carries on the analysis. Through the investigation of the above two stages, the basic situation and practical operation of the judicial institute have been fully understood and grasped. In this paper, the form of research report, strive to be more complete, true display of the process and results of the survey. The research report is composed of five parts. The first is the brief introduction of the research project, which briefly introduces the name, object, purpose and time of the investigation. The second is the description of the research methods, the orientation of the investigation, the research methods and the specific steps and measures of the investigation. The third part is the research preparation stage and the research plan formulation, more detailed records the research plan formulation as well as other preliminary research preparation work. The fourth part is the research itinerary and the data summary, the whole field research process and the survey data has made the simple arrangement and the summary display. Third, the fourth part is mainly aimed at the field investigation part, the literature research process is relatively single, does not subdivide the preparation stage and the implementation stage. The fifth part is the results of the investigation, from the general situation of the judicial institute, the function of the judicial institute, the construction of the judicial institute, the relationship between the judicial institution mediation and the people's mediation, The problems facing the development of the judicial institute are described in five aspects, including the observation of the judicial institute and the consideration of some important problems.
【學位授予單位】：北方工業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 張勤;李楓;徐輝;蘇潔瓊;衛(wèi)琳;;創(chuàng)新我國城鄉(xiāng)協(xié)調發(fā)展體制的幾點思考[J];城市規(guī)劃;2006年01期

2 王子正;論司法行政及其改革[J];當代法學;2003年12期

3 張金才;;新時期我國法制建設的歷史進程與基本經(jīng)驗[J];當代中國史研究;2006年02期

4 韋書覺;;方法與問題——以農(nóng)村民事糾紛的分析為例[J];河池學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2005年06期

5 宋華琳;英國的行政裁判所制度[J];華東政法學院學報;2004年05期

6 肖富群;居民社區(qū)參與的動力機制分析[J];廣西社會科學;2004年05期

7 吳思紅;;鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)體制改革與管理模式創(chuàng)新[J];中共杭州市委黨校學報;2006年03期

相關碩士學位論文 前5條

1 曹怡;論我國社區(qū)矯正制度的建立和完善[D];對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學;2006年

2 朱紅萱;鄉(xiāng)土社會人民調解的組織與自組織[D];華中師范大學;2007年

3 單德申;我國城市基層群眾性自治組織自治性研究[D];華東政法大學;2007年

4 廖清平;城市社區(qū)自治機構建設研究[D];西南政法大學;2007年

5 潘爽;上海城區(qū)的社區(qū)自治研究[D];上海交通大學;2007年

，

本文編號：2061555